Abstract
Can health economics be both more conservative and more radical than it seems at first sight? The answer is yes, once one recognises how diverse the discipline really is. Rational choice tends to dominate economic thinking, but there are alternative schools of thought, as well as differences in perspective even among economists who identify with the mainstream. Different schools of thought adhere to different sets of principles. These shape the economist’s view of the value of health promotion, determine what costs and benefits will be included in an evaluation and influence the conclusions that will be drawn and the advice that will be passed on to decision-makers. The differences and debates among the various schools of economic thought may appear rather abstract at times, but if health economists are to be held to account for the results of their work, then it is essential that health promotion practitioners and researchers are familiar with the arguments. To that end, we describe four contested views, summarising the essential principles on which each is based, and discussing the impact these principles have on each perspective’s appreciation of the role and value of health promotion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Becker, G. (1992). The economic approach to human behavior. University of Chicago Press.
Blaug, M. (1998). Where are we now in British health economics? Health Economics, 7, S63–S78.
Brouwer, W. B. F., Culyer, A. J., van Exel, N. J. A., & Rutten, F. F. H. (2008). Welfarism vs extra-welfarism. Journal of Health Economics, 27, 325–338.
Coast, J. (2009). Maximisation in extra-welfarism: A critique of the current position in health economics. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 786–792.
Coast, J., Smith, R. D., & Lorgelly, P. (2008). Welfarism, extra-welfarism and capability: The spread of ideas in health economics. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 1190–1198.
Cohen, J. T., Neumann, P. J., & Weinstein, M. C. (2008). Does preventive care save money? Health economics and the presidential candidates. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 661–663.
Culyer, A. J. (1989). The normative economics of health care finance and provision. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 5, 34–58.
Culyer, A. J. (2005). The dictionary of health economics (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Culyer, A. J. (2008). Resource allocation in health care: Alan Williams’ decision maker, the authority and Pareto. In A. Mason & A. Towse (Eds.), The ideas and influence of Alan Williams (pp. 57–74). Radcliffe Publishing Ltd..
Davis, J. D. (2009). Competing conceptions of the individual in recent economics. In D. Ross & H. Kincaid (Eds.), Oxford handbook of the philosophy of economic science. Oxford University Press.
Donaldson, C., Birch, S., & Gafni, A. (2002). The distribution problem in economic evaluation and the evaluation of costs and consequences of health care programmes. Health Economics, 11, 55–70.
Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care Programmes. Oxford University Press.
England, P. (1993). The separative self: Androcentric bias in neoclassical assumptions. In M. A. Ferber & J. A. Nelson (Eds.), Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics. University of Chicago Press.
Evans, R. (1984). Strained mercy: The economics of Canadian health care. Butterworths.
Hertzman, C. (1999). Population health and human development. In D. P. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Developmental health and the wealth of nations: Social biological and educational dynamics. The Guilford Press.
Hodgson, G. M. (2008). An institutional and evolutionary perspective on health economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, 235–256.
Jan, S. (2000). Institutional considerations in priority setting: Transactions cost perspective on PBMA. Health Economics, 9, 631–641.
Lawson, T. (2006). The nature of heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 483–505.
Lorgelly, P., Lorimer, K., Fenwick, E. A. L., Briggs, A. H., & Anand, P. (2015). Operationalising the capability approach as an outcome measure in public health: The development of the OCAP-18. Social Science and Medicine, 142, 68–81.
Mansdotter, A. (2006). Health, economics, and feminism: On judging fairness and reform. Umea University, Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-731
Marx, K., & de Leon, D. (1914). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (3rd ed.). Charles H Herr & Co..
McDaid, D., Sassi, F., & Merkur, S. (2015). Promoting health, preventing disease: The economic case. Open University Press.
McMaster, R. (2007). On the need for heterodox health economics. Post-Autistic Economics Review, 41, 9–22.
Mitchell, G. (2005). Libertarian paternalism is an oxymoron. North Western University Law Review, 99, 1245–1278.
Mooney, G. (2005). Communitarian claims and community capabilities: Furthering priority setting. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 247–255.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
Philipson, T., & Posner, R. (2008). Is the obesity epidemic a public health problem? A decade of research in the economics of obesity. NBER.
Roemer, M. I. (1982). Market failure and health care policy. Journal of Public Health Policy, 3, 419–431.
Ryan, M., & San Miguel, F. (2003). Revisiting the axiom of completeness in health care. Health Economics, 12, 295–307.
Sen, A. (1979). Utilitarianism and welfarism. The Journal of Philosophy, 76, 463–489.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Shiell, A., & Hawe, P. (1996). Health promotion, community development and the tyranny of individualism. Health Economics, 5, 241–247.
Shiell, A., Seymour, J., & Hawe, P. (2000). Are preferences over health states complete? Health Economics, 9, 47–55.
Stigler, G. J. (1950). The development of utility theory I. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 307327.
Teschl, M., & Comin, F. (2005). Adaptive preferences and capabilities: Some preliminary explorations. Review of Social Economy, 63, 229–247.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Yale University Press.
Urbina, D. A., & Ruiz-Villaverde, A. (2019). A critical review of homo economicus from five approaches. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78, 63–93.
Vos, T., Carter, R., Barendregt, J., Mihaopolous, C., Veerman, L., & Magnus, A. (2010). Assessing cost-effectiveness in prevention (ACE-prevention): Final report. University of Queensland & Deakin University.
Wallerstein, N., & Bernstein, B. (1988). Empowerment education: Freire’s ideas adapted to health education. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 379–394.
Watts, M., Comin, F., & Ridley, B. (2008). Adaptive preferences and educational policies. Paper presented at the Human Development and Capability Association Annual Conference, New Delhi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shiell, A., Jackson, H., Hawe, P. (2023). Underlying Principles of Different Schools of Economic Thought: Consequences for Health Promotion Research. In: Jourdan, D., Potvin, L. (eds) Global Handbook of Health Promotion Research, Vol. 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20401-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20401-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20400-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20401-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)