Abstract
The female genital tract includes the vulva and vagina, uterus and uterine cervix, fallopian tubes, and ovaries. The most common cytologic specimen encountered is the Papanicolaou (Pap) test for cervical cancer screening, from which ectocervical squamous cells and endocervical glandular cells are obtained, as well as endometrial lining cells on occasion. Cells from the upper gynecologic tract, such as the lining cells of the fallopian tubes and ovaries, can also be seen in pelvic washings that are commonly performed at the time of gynecologic surgery. The following chapter focuses on the cytologic spectrum of normal and benign squamous cells, endocervical cells, endometrial cells, fallopian tube surface epithelium, and ovarian cellular elements, with a particular focus on common cytologic findings in the “negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy” Pap test.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kurtycz DFI, Staats PN, Young NA, Bibbo M, Colgan TJ, Prey MU, Nayar R. Non-neoplastic findings. In: Nayar R, Wilbur D, editors. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 29–89.
Hoda RS, Loukeris K, Abdul-Karim FW. Gynecologic cytology on conventional and liquid-based preparations: a comprehensive review of similarities and differences. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41(3):257–78.
Crothers BA, Booth CN, Darragh TM, Zhao C, Souers RJ, Thomas N, Moriarty AT. False-positive Papanicolaou (PAP) test rates in the College of American Pathologists PAP education and PAP proficiency test programs: evaluation of false-positive responses of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or cancer to a negative reference diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(5):613–9.
Morrison C, Prokorym P, Piquero C, Wakely PE, Nuovo GJ. Oral contraceptive pills are associated with artifacts in ThinPrep Pap smears that mimic low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Cancer. 2003;99:75–82.
Kanahara T, Hirokawa M. Herxheimer spiral in cervico-vaginal smears. J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol. 1999;38(6):623–4.
Torous VF, Pitman MB. Interpretation pitfalls and malignant mimics in cervical cytology. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2021;10(2):115–27.
Samedi VG, Bocklage T. Female reproductive system cytology. In: Pitfalls in diagnostic cytopathology with key differentiating cytologic features. Essentials in cytopathology, vol. 27. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 43–81.
Williams MPA, Kukkar V, Stemmer MN, Khurana KK. Cytomorphologic findings of cervical Pap smears from female-to-male transgender patients on testosterone therapy. Cancer Cytopathol. 2020;128(7):491–8.
Novotony DB, Maygarden SJ, Johnson DE, Frable WJ. Tubal metaplasia. A frequent potential pitfall in the cytologic diagnosis of endocervical glandular dysplasia on cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1992;36:1–10.
Cibas ES, Chelmow D, Waxman AG, Moriarty AT. Endometrial cells: the how and when of reporting. In: Nayar R, Wilbur D, editors. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 91–102.
Munakata S. Diagnostic value of endometrial cytology and related technology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2022;50(7):363–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24956.
De Peralta-Venturino MN, Purslow MJ, Kini SR. Endometrial cells of the “lower uterine segment” (LUS) in cervical smears obtained by endocervical brushings: a source of potential diagnostic pitfall. Diagn Cytopathol. 1995;12(3):263–71.
Chhieng DC, Elgert P, Cangiarella JF, Cohen JM. Significance of AGUS Pap smears in pregnant and postpartum women. Acta Cytol. 2001;45(3):294–9.
Barkan GA, Naylor B, Gattuso P, Küllü S, Galan K, Wojcik EM. Morphologic features of endometriosis in various types of cytologic specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41(11):936–42.
Pantanowitz L, Austin RM, Michelow P. Gynecological infections. In: Cytopathology of infectious diseases. Essentials in cytopathology, vol. 17. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 85–102.
Birdsong GG, Davey DD. Specimen adequacy. In: Nayar R, Wilbur D, editors. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 1–28.
Selvaggi SM. Diagnostic pitfalls of peritoneal washing cytology and the role of cell blocks in their diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;28(6):335–41.
Martínez-Onsurbe P, Ruiz Villaespesa A, Sanz Anquela JM, Valenzuela Ruiz PL. Aspiration cytology of 147 adnexal cysts with histologic correlation. Acta Cytol. 2001;45(6):941–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cantley, R.L., Smola, B., Naik, K., Pantanowitz, L. (2022). Female Reproductive System. In: Lew, M., Pang, J., Pantanowitz, L. (eds) Normal Cytology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20336-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20336-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20335-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20336-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)