Skip to main content

Urinary Tract

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Normal Cytology
  • 473 Accesses

Abstract

The urinary tract consists of the kidney, ureters, bladder, and urethra. Urine is one of the most common non-gynecological cytologic specimens evaluated, as it provides a convenient method by which clinicians can screen and triage patients with urinary symptoms or a history of exposure to bladder-toxic agents, as well as follow-up patients with prior bladder cancer. This chapter details the cytomorphologic spectrum of normal urothelial cells and diagnostic pitfalls associated with normal urinary tract elements likely to be encountered in urine cytology. This chapter also highlights normal structures of the kidney and provides an overview of the utility of fine needle aspiration in the evaluation of kidney lesions and diagnostic pitfalls associated with misinterpretation of normal renal and nonrenal elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kasiske BL, Umen AJ. The influence of age, sex, race, and body habitus on kidney weight in humans. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986;110(1):55–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Volpe A, Finelli A, Gill IS, Jewett MAS, Martignoni G, Polascik TJ, Remzi M, Uzzo RG. Rationale for percutaneous biopsy and histologic characterization of renal tumours. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang CS, Choi E, Idrees MT, Chen X, Wu HH. Percutaneous biopsy of the renal mass: FNA or core needle biopsy? Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125(6):407–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME, Bass EB, Cadeddu JA, Chang A, Clark PE, Davis BJ, Derweesh IH, Giambarresi L, Gervais DA, Hu SL, Lane BR, Leibovich BC, Pierorazio. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2017;198(3):520–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eikren O, Walter TC, Flatberg A, Beisvag V, Strauss P, Farstad M, Beisland C, Koch E, Mueller TF, Marti HP. Fine needle aspirates of kidneys: a promising tool for RNA sequencing in native and transplanted kidneys. BMC Neprhol. 2018;19(1):221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cate F, Kapp ME, Arnold SA. Core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration alone or in combination: diagnostic accuracy and impact on management of renal masses. J Urol. 2017;197(6):1396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsivian M, Rampersaud EN Jr, del Pilar Laguna Pes M, et al. Small renal mass biopsy—how, what and when: report from an international consensus panel. BJU Int. 2014;113(6):854–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bawari K, Jummerlin IP, ten Kate FH, Algaba F, Trias I, Wijkstra H, De la Rosette JJ, Laguna P. What is the added value of combined core biopsy and fine needle aspiration in the diagnostic process of renal tumours? World J Urol. 2013;31(4):823–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parks GE, Perkins LA, Zagoria RJ, Garvin AJ, Sirintrapun SJ, Geisinger KR. Benefits of combined approach to sampling of renal neoplasms as demonstrated in a series of 351 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(6):827–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tong GX, Yu WM, Beaubier NT, Weeden EM, Hamele-Bena D, Mansukhani MM, O’Toole KM. Expression of PAX8 in normal and neoplastic renal tissues: an immunohistochemical study. Modern Pathol. 2009;22(9):1218–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Luong-Player A, Liu H, Wang HL, Lin F. Immunohistochemical reevaluation of carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX) expression in tumors and normal tissues. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014;141(2):219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Donato DP, Johnson MT, Yang XJ, Zynger DL. Expression of carbonic anhydrase IX in genitourinary and adrenal tumours. Histopathology. 2011;59(6):1229–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Szponar A, Beothe T, Kovacs G. How useful is alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of kidney cancers? Histopathology. 2009;56(20):263–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miliaras D, Karasavvidou F, Papanikolaou A, Sioutopoulou D. KIT expression in fetal, normal adult, and neoplastic tissues. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57(5):463–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bagley DH, Huffman JL, Lyon ES. Flexible ureteropyeloscopy: diagnostic and treatment in the upper urinary tract. J Urol. 1987;138(2):280–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Potts SA, Thomas PA, Cohen MB, Raab SS. Diagnostic accuracy and key cytologic features of high-grade transitional cell carcinoma in the upper urinary tract. Mod Pathol. 1997;10(7):657–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moore KL. The pelvis and perineum. In: Clinically oriented anatomy. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tanagho E. Anatomy of the lower urinary tracts. Campbell’s urology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Philip AT, Amin MB, Tamboli P, Lee TJ, Hill CE, Ro JY. Intravesical adipose tissue: a quantitative study of its presence and location with implications for therapy and prognosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24(9):1286–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liffman R, Courtman N. Fine needle aspiration of abdominal organs: a review of current recommendations for achieving a diagnostic sample. J Small Anim Pract. 2017;58(11):599–609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pantanowitz L, Otis CN. Cystitis glandularis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36(3):181–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rashidi B, Tongson-Ignacio JE. Melamed-Wolinska bodies in urine cytology an interesting aggregate in a degenerated urothelial cell. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011;39(2):117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Renshaw AA, Madge R, Granter SR. Intracytoplasmic eosinophilic inclusions (Melamed-Wolinska bodies). Association with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma in pleural fluid. Acta Cytol. 1997;41(4):995–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Quiroga-Garza G, Nassar D, Khalbuss WE, Monaco SE, Pantanowitz. Vegetable cell contaminants in urinary bladder diversion cytology specimens. Acta Cytol. 2012;56(3):271–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bastacky S, Ibrahim S, Wilczynski SP, Murphy WM. The accuracy of urinary cytology in daily practice. Cancer Cytopathol. 1999;87(3):118–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kannan V, Gupta D. Calculus artifact. A challenge in urinary cytology. Acta Cytol. 1999;43(5):794–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madelyn Lew .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lew, M. (2022). Urinary Tract. In: Lew, M., Pang, J., Pantanowitz, L. (eds) Normal Cytology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20336-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20336-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20335-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20336-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics