Skip to main content

Economic Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Blame and Political Attitudes
  • 227 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on how individuals perceive the causes of economic issues, such as poverty and the general state of the economy. There is a long history of blaming the poor for their own poverty in the US due to its capitalist system, which rests on individualism and the idea that a person can succeed through his or her own merits. However, studies have shown that conservatives are more likely to endorse causes of poverty that blame the poor themselves, experience less sympathy toward the poor, and be inclined against offering help, either personally or through welfare, whereas liberals are more inclined to endorse societal causes of poverty, blame the poor less, experience more sympathy, and be more favorable toward offering help. The effects of perceptions of the state of the economy are complex, but there is evidence that voting decisions are influenced by blame of political actors for a bad economy, such that one would vote against a candidate who is held responsible. This effect, however, is limited by the tendency for partisans to prefer to blame the other party and hold their own as blameless. Nonetheless, politicians use a variety of techniques in an attempt to avoid blame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Fessler, P. (2017, May 25). Housing secretary Ben Carson says poverty is a ‘state of mind’. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2017/05/25/530068988/ben-carson-says-poverty-is-astate-of-mind.

  2. 2.

    Katz, M.B. (1989) The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. New York: Pantheon.

  3. 3.

    Katz (1989) p. 13.

  4. 4.

    Lewis, O. (1966). The culture of poverty. Scientific American, 215, 19–25.

  5. 5.

    Lewis, O. (1966) p. 21.

  6. 6.

    Ryan, W. (1976). Blaming the victim. New York: Vintage Books.

  7. 7.

    Ryan, W. (1976) p. 123.

  8. 8.

    Ehrenfreund, M. (2016, August 30). The major flaw in President Clinton’s welfare reform that almost no one noticed. The Washington Post.

  9. 9.

    Hochschild, J.L. (1995). Facing up to the American dream: Race, class, and the soul of the nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  10. 10.

    Feagin, J.R. (1972). Poverty: We still believe that God helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6, 101–110.

  11. 11.

    Zucker, G.S. (nee Sahar) & Weiner, B. (1993). Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 925–943.

  12. 12.

    Sears, D.O., Lau, R.R., Tyler, T.R. & Allen, H.M. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting. American Journal of Political Science, 74, 670–684.

  13. 13.

    Petersen, M.B., Slothuus, R, Stubager, R. & Togeby, L. (2010). Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 24–52; Petersen, M.B. (2012). Social welfare as small-scale help: Evolutionary psychology and the deservingness heuristic. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 1–16.

  14. 14.

    Bullock, H.E. (1999). Attributions for poverty: A comparison of middle class and welfare recipient attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2059–2082.

  15. 15.

    Hopkins, D.J. (2009). Racial contexts’ enduring influence on attitudes toward poverty. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 770–776.

  16. 16.

    Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2), 207–227.

  17. 17.

    Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. & Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.

  18. 18.

    Pomper, G.M. (1979). The impact of The American Voter on political science. Political Science Quarterly, 93, 617–628; Lewis-Beck, M. S., Jacoby, W. G., Norpoth, H., & Weisberg, H. F. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  19. 19.

    Jost, J.T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.

  20. 20.

    Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 7–8.

  21. 21.

    Key, V.O. & Cummings, M.C. (1966). The responsible electorate; rationality in presidential voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  22. 22.

    D’Elia, J. & Norpoth, H. (2014). Winning with a bad economy. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 44, 467–483.

  23. 23.

    Saad, L. (2016, July 7). Bush still leads Obama in blame for the U.S. economic troubles. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/193517/bush-leads-obama-blame-economic-troubles.aspx.

  24. 24.

    Mills, C.W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 10–11.

  25. 25.

    Siddiquui, S. (2013, August 21). A third of Louisiana Republicans blame Obama for Hurricane Katrina response under Bush. Huffpost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/obama-hurricane-katrina_n_3790612.

  26. 26.

    Parker-Stephen, E. (2013). Tides of disagreement: How reality facilitates (and inhibits) partisan public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 75, 1077–1088.

  27. 27.

    Kilgore, E. (2019, April 25). The most popular governors in America are Republicans in blue states. New York Magazine. http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/04/blue-state-republican-governors-are-very-popular.html.

  28. 28.

    Bisgaard, M. (2019). How getting the facts right can fuel partisan-motivated reasoning. American Journal of Political Science, 63, 824–839.

  29. 29.

    Sirin, C.V. & Villalobos, J.D. (2011). Where does the buck stop? Applying attribution theory to examine public appraisals of the president. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 41, 334–357.

  30. 30.

    Karol, D. & Miguel, E. (2007). The electoral cost of war: Iraq casualties and the 2004 U.S. presidential election. The Journal of Politics, 69, 633–648.

  31. 31.

    Kriner, Douglas L. and Shen, Francis X., (2017). Battlefield casualties and ballot box defeat: Did the Bush-Obama wars cost Clinton the White House? Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2989040 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2989040; Klapper, B. & Baldor, LC. (2016, August 15). AP fact check: Donald Trump on U.S. intervention in the Middle East. PBS. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/ap-fact-check-donald-trump-mideast-history.

  32. 32.

    Weaver, R.K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6, 371–398, p. 373.

  33. 33.

    McGraw, K.M. (1991). Managing blame: An experimental test of the effects of political accounts. The American Political Science Review, 85, 1133–1157.

  34. 34.

    For another model of blame avoidance strategies used by government bureaucrats, see Hood, C. (2011). The blame game. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  35. 35.

    Grose, C.R., Malhotra, N. & Van Houweling, R.P. (2015). Explaining explanations: How legislators explain their policy positions and how citizens react. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 724–743.

  36. 36.

    Bruck, C. (2016, July 25). Why Obama has failed to close Guantánamo. The New Yorker.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sahar, G. (2023). Economic Issues. In: Blame and Political Attitudes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20236-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics