Abstract
The interest, the potential, and also the technical development in artificial intelligence assistants shows us that these will play an essential role in the future of work. Exploring the interaction and communication between human and artificial intelligence (AI) assistants forms the basis for the development of trustworthy and meaningful AI-based systems. In this paper we focused on the question how humans react to AI - more precisely, AI gents as robots - that act to influence human behavior and emotions by using two upward influencing tactics: Ingratiating and Blocking. For this purpose, we developed a playful virtual reality approach that creates a leader-subordinate relationship between humans and the AI agents in a factory environment. We explore how humans react to those agents. Among other things, we found that behaviors that are seen as likable in humans are perceived as distracting in robots (e.g., compliments used by the ingratiating tactic). Further, robots were perceived as a group and not as individuals. Our findings showed us directions and open questions which need to be investigated in future work investigating human-multi-robot interaction at the workplace.
Keywords
- Virtual reality
- Robot
- Leadership
- Influence tactics
- Human robot interaction
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aaltonen, I., Salmi, T., Marstio, I.: Refining levels of collaboration to support the design and evaluation of human-robot interaction in the manufacturing industry. Procedia CIRP 72, 93–98 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.214
Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Mubin, O., Al Mahmud, A.: Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence? Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(2), 195–204 (2009)
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Social Robot. 1, 71–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
Blender Foundation: Blender 2.8 (2022). www.blender.org/download/releases/2-80 Accessed Jan 12 2022
Blickle, G.: Einflusstaktiken von mitarbeitern und vorgesetztenbeurteilung: Eine prädiktive feldstudie. [employee influence tactics and supervisor evaluation: a predictive field study.]. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie 1 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1026//1617-6391.2.1.4
Chan, W.P., et al.: Design and evaluation of an augmented reality head-mounted display interface for human robot teams collaborating in physically shared manufacturing tasks. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3524082
Chen, J.Y.C., Haas, E.C., Barnes, M.J.: Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C Appl. Rev. 37(6), 1231–1245 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905819
Choudhury, A., Li, H., Greene, C., Perumalla, S.: Humanoid robot-application and influence. Archives Clin. Biomed. Res. 2, 198–227 (2018). https://doi.org/10.26502/acbr.50170059
Clarke, N., Alshenalfi, N., Garavan, T.: Upward influence tactics and their effects on job performance ratings and flexible working arrangements: the mediating roles of mutual recognition respect and mutual appraisal respect. Hum. Resour. Manage. 58(4), 397–416 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21967
Epic Games Inc.: Behavior trees (2004-2022), docs.unrealengine.com/4.27/en-US/InteractiveExperiences/ArtificialIntelligence/BehaviorTrees. Accessed Jan 12 2022
Epic Games Inc.: Unreal engine (2004-2022). https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US Accessed Jan 12 2022
Epitropaki, O., Martin, R.: Transformational-transactional leadership and upward influence: the role of relative leader-member exchanges (rlmx) and perceived organizational support (pos). Leadersh. Q. 24(2), 299–315 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.007
Falbe, C.M., Yukl, G.: Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Acad. Manage. J. 35(63) (1992). https://doi.org/10.5465/256490
Farmer, S., Maslyn, J., Fedor, D., Goodman, J.: Putting upward influence strategies in context. J. Organ. Behav. 18, 17–42 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199701)18:1<17::AID-JOB785>3.0.CO;2-9
Ferris, G., Judge, T., Rowland, K., Fitzgibbons, D.: Subordinate influence and the performance rating process; test and a model. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 58, 101–135 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1030
Gardner, W.L., Martinko, M.J.: Impression management in organizations. J. Manag. 14(2), 321–338 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400210
Ginevra, C., Villalba, S.D., Camurri, A.: Recognising human emotions from body movement and gesture dynamics. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pp. 71–82 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_7arXiv:9780.20139
Goetz J, Kiesler S, P.A.: Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: IEEE International Work Robot Human Interact Communication, vol. 11, 575–608 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2003.12517960
Gordon, R.A.: Impact of ingratiation on judgments and evaluations: a meta-analytic investigation. J. Personality Social Psychol. 71(54) (1996). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.54
Higgins, C.A., Judge, T.A., Ferris, G.R.: Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 24(1), 89–106 (2003). http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093798
Kao, Y.H., Wang, W.J.: Design and implementation of a family robot. In: 2015 12th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), pp. 251–256. IEEE (2015)
Kim, L.H., Follmer, S.: Ubiswarm: Ubiquitous robotic interfaces and investigation of abstract motion as a display. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1(3) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3130931, https://doi.org/10.1145/3130931
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S.M., Wilkinson, I.: Intra-organizational influence tactics: explorations in getting one’s way. J. Appl. Psychol. 65(4), 440–452 1980. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.440
Lee, S., Han, S., Cheong, M., Kim, S.L., Yun, S.: How do i get my way? a meta-analytic review of research on influence tactics. Leadersh. Q. 28(1), 210–228 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.001
Lowe, K.B., Kroeck, K.G., Sivasubramaniam, N.: Effectiveness correlates of transformation and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic review of the mlq literature. Leadersh. Q. 7, 385–425 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90027-2
Lunghi, G., Marin, R., Di Castro, M., Masi, A., Sanz, P.J.: Multimodal human-robot interface for accessible remote robotic interventions in hazardous environments. IEEE Access 7, 127290–127319 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939493
Ma, L.M., IJtsma, M., Feigh, K.M., Pritchett, A.R.: Metrics for human-robot team design: A teamwork perspective on evaluation of human-robot teams. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3522581
Madigan, C., Johnstone, K., Way, K.A., Capra, M.: How do safety professionals’ influence managers within organizations? a critical incident approach. Saf. Sci. 144, 105478 (2021)
Marin Vargas, A., Cominelli, L., Dell’Orletta, F., Scilingo, E.P.: Verbal communication in robotics: A study on salient terms, research fields and trends in the last decades based on a computational linguistic analysis. Front. Comput. Sci. 2 591164 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.591164
Saunderson, S., Nejat, G.: How Robots Influence Humans: a survey of nonverbal communication in social human–robot interaction. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 11(4), 575–608 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00523-0
Saunderson, S.P., Nejat, G.: Persuasive robots should avoid authority: The effects of formal and real authority on persuasion in human-robot interaction. Science robotics 6, eabd5186 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abd5186
Schriesheim, C.A., Hinkin, T.R.: Influence tactics used by subordinates: a theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the kipnis, schmidt, and wilkinson subscales. J. Appl. Psychol. 75, 246–257 (1990)
Thomas, F., Johnston, O.: The illusion of life: Disney animation. Hyperion New York (1995)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) within the project “Virtual Skills Lab" (FFG No. 872573) and the project “MED1stMR" (Medical First Responder Training using a Mixed Reality Approach featuring haptic feedback for enhanced realism) funded by the H2020 program (Grant Agreement No. 101021775).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gerdenitsch, C., Weinhofer, M., Puthenkalam, J., Kriglstein, S. (2022). Upward Influence Tactics: Playful Virtual Reality Approach for Analysing Human Multi-robot Interaction. In: Göbl, B., van der Spek, E., Baalsrud Hauge, J., McCall, R. (eds) Entertainment Computing – ICEC 2022. ICEC 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13477. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20212-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20212-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20211-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20212-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
-
Published in cooperation with
http://www.ifip.org/