Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The School Literacy Agenda: Traditional School Literacies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multiple Literacies for Dance, Physical Education and Sports

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Education ((SPTE))

  • 206 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter builds upon a basic foundation of traditional literacy development and theoretical basis to explore reading as thinking in context. Many strategies that can be applied before, during after reading are explored through the traditional literacy lens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alabama Department of Education (2007). Planning strategic lessons: A step by step guide. Alabama Reading Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R. (2019). The hidden push for phonics legislation. Tennessee Literacy Journal, 1, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear, D. R. (2012). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourque, P. (2019). SPARK! : Quick writes to kindle hearts and minds in elementary classrooms. Stenhouse Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunger, J., & Lewis, J. P. (2006). Building a knowledge base in reading (2nd ed.). International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervetti, G., Jaynes, C., & Hiebert, E. (2009). Increasing opportunities to acquire knowledge through reading. In Reading more, reading better (pp. 79–100). Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K. (2008). Reading for real: Teach students to read with power, intention, and joy in K-3 classrooms. Stenhouse Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Resource Group. (2021, May). What does it say, mean, matter organizer. https://www.myedresource.com/wp-content/uploads/FreeResources/MustHaveLiteracyTools/Say-Mean-Matter-Graphic-Organizer.pdf

  • Estes, T. H., & Vaughan, J. L. (1985). Reading and learning in the content classroom: Diagnostic and instructional strategies (2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, R. (2018). Preparing reading professionals: The case of dyslexia. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(2), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind. [electronic resource]: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2017). Strategies that work: teaching comprehension for engagement, understanding, and building knowledge, grades K-8. Stenhouse Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, S., Goudvis, A., & Wallis, J. (2010). Comprehension intervention: Small-group lessons for the comprehension toolkit. Firsthand Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, L. (2009). Revisit, reflect, retell: Time-tested strategies for teaching reading comprehension. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILA. (2019). Children experiencing reading difficulties: What we know and what we can do. Retrieved from https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/ila-children-experiencing-reading-difficulties.pdf

  • Johnston, V. (2019). Dyslexia: What reading teachers need to know. The Reading Teacher, 73(3), 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucer, S. B. (2005). Dimensions of Literacy: a conceptual base for teaching reading and writing in school settings (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupo. (2021). Snowball Summaries. http://luposliteracylounge.weebly.com/ari-literacy-strategies-before-during-after.html

  • Maring, G., Furman, G., & Blum-Anderson, J. (1985). Five cooperative learning strategies for mainstreamed youngsters in content area classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 39, 310–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. W., & Moore, S. A. (1986). Possible sentences. In E. K. Dishner, T. W. Bean, J. E. Readence, & D. W. Moore (Eds.), Reading in the content areas: Improving classroom instruction (2nd ed., pp.174–179). Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. David, J. A. Dole, G. G. Duffy, & L.R. Roehler. (1992). Developing expertise in reading comprehension: What should be taught and how should it be taught? In J. Farstup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say to the teacher of reading (2nd ed., pp. 145–199). International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Readence, J., Bean, T., & Baldwin, R. (2000). Content area reading: An integrated approach. Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. (2003). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press. Reprinted by permission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serravallo, J. (2015). The reading strategies book: Your everything guide to developing skilled readers. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, K., Harste, J., & Burke, C. (1996). Creating classrooms for authors and inquirers. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, K. (2020). The one and only science of teaching reading. Presentation at the Literacy Research Association. [Virtual]

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2017). Lenses on reading : An introduction to theories and models (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. A. L. (2008). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum. Pearson/Allyn&Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zygouris-Coe, V., Wiggins, M. B., & Smith, L. H. (2004). Engaging students with text: The 3-2-1 strategy. The Reading Teacher, 58(4), 381–384. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.4.8

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Elementary Education, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA

    Shelly Huggins

Authors
  1. Shelly Huggins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelly Huggins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Reading Education, Towson University, TOWSON, MD, USA

    Stephen G. Mogge

  2. Graduate Reading Education, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA

    Shelly Huggins

  3. Dance Education, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA

    Jaye Knutson

  4. Department of Kinesiology, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA

    Elin E. Lobel

  5. Department of Secondary and Middle School Education, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA

    Pamela Segal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Huggins, S. (2023). The School Literacy Agenda: Traditional School Literacies. In: Mogge, S.G., Huggins, S., Knutson, J., Lobel, E.E., Segal, P. (eds) Multiple Literacies for Dance, Physical Education and Sports. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20117-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20117-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20116-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20117-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation