Abstract
Data is an important production factor in the era of digital economy. Privacy computing can ensure that data providers do not disclose sensitive data, carry out multi-party joint analysis and computation, securely and privately complete the full excavation of data value in the process of circulation, sharing, fusion, and calculation, which has become a popular research topic. String comparison is one of the common operations in data processing. To address the string comparison problem in multi-party scenarios, we propose an algorithm for secure string comparison based on outsourced computation. The algorithm encodes the strings with one hot encoding scheme and encrypts the encoded strings using an XOR homomorphic encryption scheme. The proposed algorithm achieves efficient and secure string comparison and counts the number of different characters with the help of a cloud-assisted server. The proposed scheme is implemented and verified using the new coronavirus gene sequence as the comparison string, and the performance is compared with that of a state-of-the-art security framework. Experiments show that the proposed algorithm can effectively improve the string comparison speed and obtain correct comparison results without compromising data privacy.
Supported by the Scientific and Technological Project of State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd (No. J2021038).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yao, A.C.: Protocols for secure computations. In: 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (SFCS 1982), pp. 160–164. IEEE (1982)
Zhao, C., et al.: Secure multi-party computation: theory, practice and applications. Inf. Sci. 476, 357–372 (2019)
Himeur, Y., Sohail, S.S., Bensaali, F., Amira, A., Alazab, M.: Latest trends of security and privacy in recommender systems: a comprehensive review and future perspectives. Comput. Secur. 118, 102746 (2022)
Suresh, A.: Mpcleague: robust MPC platform for privacy-preserving machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.13338 (2021)
Zheng, W., Deng, R., Chen, W., Ada Popa, R., Panda, A., Stoica, I.: CEREBRO: a platform for \(\{\)Multi-Party\(\}\) cryptographic collaborative learning. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 2021), pp. 2723–2740 (2021)
Keller, M., Orsini, E., Scholl, P.: Mascot: faster malicious arithmetic secure computation with oblivious transfer. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 830–842 (2016)
Keller, M., Pastro, V., Rotaru, D.: Overdrive: making SPDZ great again. In: Nielsen, J.B., Rijmen, V. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2018. LNCS, vol. 10822, pp. 158–189. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78372-7_6
Goethals, B., Laur, S., Lipmaa, H., Mielikäinen, T.: On private scalar product computation for privacy-preserving data mining. In: Park, C., Chee, S. (eds.) ICISC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3506, pp. 104–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11496618_9
Wright, R., Yang, Z.: Privacy-preserving Bayesian network structure computation on distributed heterogeneous data. In: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 713–718 (2004)
Feigenbaum, J., Ishai, Y., Malkin, T., Nissim, K., Strauss, M.J., Wright, R.N.: Secure multiparty computation of approximations. In: Orejas, F., Spirakis, P.G., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2076, pp. 927–938. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48224-5_75
Freedman, M.J., Nissim, K., Pinkas, B.: Efficient private matching and set intersection. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 1–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_1
Indyk, P., Woodruff, D.: Polylogarithmic private approximations and efficient matching. In: Halevi, S., Rabin, T. (eds.) TCC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3876, pp. 245–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11681878_13
Jarrous, A., Pinkas, B.: Secure hamming distance based computation and its applications. In: Abdalla, M., Pointcheval, D., Fouque, P.-A., Vergnaud, D. (eds.) ACNS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5536, pp. 107–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01957-9_7
Yasuda, M., Shimoyama, T., Kogure, J., Yokoyama, K., Koshiba, T.: Packed homomorphic encryption based on ideal lattices and its application to biometrics. In: Cuzzocrea, A., Kittl, C., Simos, D.E., Weippl, E., Xu, L. (eds.) CD-ARES 2013. LNCS, vol. 8128, pp. 55–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40588-4_5
Ge, N., et al.: An efficient analog hamming distance comparator realized with a unipolar memristor array: a showcase of physical computing. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–7 (2017)
Khan, M., Miranskyy, A.: String comparison on a quantum computer using hamming distance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.16173 (2021)
Kang, J., Li, S., Yang, X., et al.: Secure multiparty string matching computation. J. Cryptol. Res. 4(3), 241–252 (2017)
Hazay, C., Lindell, Y.: Efficient protocols for set intersection and pattern matching with security against malicious and covert adversaries. In: Canetti, R. (ed.) TCC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4948, pp. 155–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78524-8_10
Frikken, K.B.: Practical private DNA string searching and matching through efficient oblivious automata evaluation. In: Gudes, E., Vaidya, J. (eds.) DBSec 2009. LNCS, vol. 5645, pp. 81–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03007-9_6
Mohassel, P., Niksefat, S., Sadeghian, S., Sadeghiyan, B.: An efficient protocol for oblivious DFA evaluation and applications. In: Dunkelman, O. (ed.) CT-RSA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7178, pp. 398–415. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27954-6_25
Kolesnikov, V., Rosulek, M., Trieu, N.: SWiM: secure wildcard pattern matching from OT extension. In: Meiklejohn, S., Sako, K. (eds.) FC 2018. LNCS, vol. 10957, pp. 222–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58387-6_12
Gennaro, R., Hazay, C., Sorensen, J.S.: Text search protocols with simulation based security. In: Nguyen, P.Q., Pointcheval, D. (eds.) PKC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6056, pp. 332–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13013-7_20
Knuth, D.E., Morris, Jr. J.H., Pratt, V.R.: Fast pattern matching in strings. SIAM J. Comput. 6(2), 323–350 (1977)
Yasuda, M., Shimoyama, T., Kogure, J., Yokoyama, K., Koshiba, T.: Secure pattern matching using somewhat homomorphic encryption. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Workshop on Cloud Computing Security Workshop, pp. 65–76 (2013)
Faust, S., Hazay, C., Venturi, D.: Outsourced pattern matching. In: Fomin, F.V., Freivalds, R., Kwiatkowska, M., Peleg, D. (eds.) ICALP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7966, pp. 545–556. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39212-2_48
Goldwasser, S., Micali, S.: Probabilistic encryption. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 28(2), 270–299 (1984)
Keller. M.: MP-SPDZ: a versatile framework for multi-party computation. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1575–1590 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
AAppendix
AAppendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhang, X., Shan, C., Zou, Y. (2023). Multi-party Secure Comparison of Strings Based on Outsourced Computation. In: Xu, Y., Yan, H., Teng, H., Cai, J., Li, J. (eds) Machine Learning for Cyber Security. ML4CS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13656. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20099-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20099-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20098-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20099-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)