There is an acute scarcity of research and studies on the conditions of healthcare in African countries. According to Marincola and Kariuki (2020), 20% of the global disease burden falls on the shoulders of Africa, yet only 1% of worldwide scientific output focuses on African countries. Filling the epistemological gap is critical, for it will not only shine a light on our understanding of the realities of the continent, but also pave way for more engaged future studies. The investigation of existing healthcare conditions in Africa provides an indispensable basis for generating educated responses to the challenges that confront the continent as a whole and across its different localities. Africa also occupies a historically overlooked and underrepresented position. It is a unique continent with highly diverse cultures, societies, and economic compositions. While significantly different from the Western or more economically developed parts of the world, Africa is playing a crucial role on the global stage in a variety of aspects. Therefore, studies of Africa will not only benefit the regional communities, but also have a long-lasting impact on the rest of the world.

Africa carries the oldest and most diverse genome. Around seven billion of the world’s population share a common origin in Africa. The burden of disease in Africa is also shifting from communicable to non-communicable diseases, which is also a major concern of the societies that are more economically developed. Therefore, addressing the disease burden in Africa, in parallel, means investing in the prevention and treatment of diseases in the rest of the world.

Increasing the amount of scientific research in healthcare in Africa can also benefit the cost-effectiveness of government expenditure and private sector (e.g. pharmaceutical and biotech companies) investment. For example, scientific research may constantly inspect the current healthcare system, particularly its principles, status, barriers, and vulnerabilities. This type of inspection often contributes to possible developments and modifications to the system that, in the future, will perform better for its users, governments, and other private investigators.

Theoretically, scientific output focused on African countries has great potential in terms of its natural growth. The median age in Africa is 19.7 years, making these populations the youngest and fastest-growing in the world. This implies that Africa will have a comparably higher ratio of working-age individuals to non-working-age individuals in the foreseeable future. More workers will join the healthcare field as providers, researchers, or other professional personnel. If the government provide enough resource to accept the incoming growing population in the scientific research team, the gap between the disease burden that Africa bears and the scientific output should alleviate in the future.

The number of scientific research related to the healthcare field in Africa has increased tremendously compared to the last century. However, many of them are published in the form of government reports, non-government organization reports, academic articles, or newspaper articles. This type of publication is more up-to-date with the content and the data, but the information is rather scattered due to the limitation of the publication format. The book publications provide more comprehensive and integrated information that depicts a more complete overview of the healthcare system in Africa, but the publication dates of the books are mostly from twenty or thirty years ago. Therefore, this book aims at providing an updated and integrated overview of the healthcare system in Africa, as well as compiling a list of data and report sources that updates their information on Africa annually.

In 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) published 100 health indicators that were initially developed to ease the burden of reporting requirements of health monitoring but now serve as a tool to aid the global community in monitoring national and global progress, maintaining program support and advocating for resources and funding. The indicators include four main categories: health status, risk factors, service coverage, and health system. Some examples of the indicators are life expectancy at birth, maternal mortality ratio, children under 5 who are stunted, Immunization coverage rate, and health worker density and distribution. This book takes these 100 indicators as a crucial reference and aims at providing a brief overview of the current healthcare system in Africa along with other socio-economic factors.

A total of eight African countries are selected as samples in this book: Algeria, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, and Tunisia. Three of the countries are from North Africa, three are from West Africa, one from East Africa, and one from South Africa. The diversity in the location, culture, and economic development of the countries should provide a comprehensive profile of the African continent. North Africa has a stronger public healthcare system compared to other parts of Africa.

The healthcare system of these countries is investigated in five parts: the country’s demographics, disease burden, health resources, health affordability, and the use of social media and technology. These aspects are directly and indirectly related to each other as well as the performance of the healthcare system.

The country’s demographics investigate the country’s population, population growth, population density, urbanization rate, life expectancy, median age, fertility rate, gender equality, economy, and education. These factors play an implicit role when it comes to governments’ decisions on policies and patients’ decisions related to their own healthcare and well-being. For example, the current age structure is highly skewed to the younger side. This implies that the population structure will eventually be advantageous as the proportion of working-age people increases, but at the same time may be disadvantageous as the current governments and families are facing huge financial burdens due to health and education expenditures. Compared to those countries that are more economically developed and have an older population, relatively fewer health resources need to be invested in diseases related to the population. The fertility rate in many African countries, such as Nigeria, can be relevant to the fertility-related decision maker, which is usually the male, at home. The female in a traditional family usually does not have the right to decide when and how many they are going to give birth and stay at home to fulfill their domestic role. Consequently, they may less likely to seek healthcare such as breast and cervical cancer screening and HIV treatment.

In the past two decades, incidences of infectious diseases have been overtaken by NCDs as urbanization and Westernization spread across the continent. The disease burden chapter looks at the prevalence, death rate, and incidence rate of both communicable and non-communicable diseases in the eight countries in the past decade. The diseases studied in this chapter include: Malaria, HIV/AIDs, Tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases (Ischemic heart disease, stroke, and hypertensive heart disease), respiratory disorders, cancer (breast cancer, lung cancer, cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, and liver cancer), diabetes, cirrhosis and other liver diseases, This chapter also explores risk factors proved to be correlated with the increase in non-communicable disease cases, such as alcohol and cigarette consumption, nutrition, urbanization, physical activities, overweight, and obesity. Though not included in this report, a statistical model and analysis will be run using the factors and data collected in this section. Ideally, understanding the correlations between risk factors, incidence, and death rates of these diseases should provide a reliable prediction of the future disease burden in Africa.

Health resource is scarce in Africa, even though it carries over 20% of the global burden of disease. According to the target set by WHO, there should be at least two hospitals per 100,000 inhabitants, and 20 doctors per 100,000 inhabitants. Most countries studied in this book achieve the target of having at least two hospitals per 100,000 population, but only nationally not regionally. Most health resources are concentrated in the urban areas, leaving the rural areas less accessible to the resources. Furthermore, healthcare in most countries is divided into private and public. Public healthcare is often funded by the government and offered to all citizens, and private healthcare facilities are used mostly by people with more access to funds. In countries in North Africa, where the government provides a stronger healthcare budget, the healthcare facilities are mainly run publicly rendering less financial burden on patients. While in other countries, public hospitals are often less funded and more crowded, many patients with more sufficient financial ability would seek treatment through private hospitals. The loss of healthcare professional personnel is also a crucial issue existing in the healthcare system in Africa. South Africa reported an increasing resignation trend in the medical professions between 2011–2015 due to unsatisfactory salary and working conditions in the public hospitals, where they received their medical training after graduation. After resignation, these professionals often relocate themselves to private sectors, other provinces, or abroad, causing a lack of providers in the public sector.

The cost of healthcare is an enormous financial burden for the government, families, and individuals. When talking about paying medical bills, the common financial resource includes personal income and savings, as well as support from the government. Therefore, this chapter investigates insurance coverage, government expenditure on healthcare, and individual affordability, aiming at understanding the financial burden that the patient may bear when seeking medical services. Among the studied countries, only Algeria managed to provide free healthcare through insurance. The other countries tend to have a complete insurance scheme and have the choice of enrolling in private and public insurance. However, issues like public insurance are often underfunded, the claims take too long to process and the insurance is not reinforced, leaving the patients any choice but to cover the medical bills out-of-pocket upfront. Therefore, individual affordability becomes crucial when people make medical decisions. Thus, in the investigation, individual affordability is further broken down into the cost of a single hospital visit and hospitalization, the average income, and the poverty in the country, trying to understand to what extent a patient is likely to have the financial ability to cover the bills. Generally, governments are experiencing severe budget constraints, and the average cost of healthcare tends to exceed the patients’ financial ability if they are earning an average or less than the average wage.

The geographic disparity in the allocation of healthcare resources can be identified in many African countries. Rural communities across the continent typically have restricted access to fewer resources. Not only are these regions faced with a limited supply of medical facilities, services, and healthcare professionals, but they are also more likely to be at a social, educational, and financial disadvantage. In addition, resources are unevenly distributed between urban and rural areas. Members of rural communities often have to travel long distances to urban areas to seek medical treatment or assistance. Given all the barriers and inequalities in real life, the Internet and social media serve as critical alternative avenues for people to access basic healthcare services regardless of their physical location. Therefore, this chapter collects data on the coverage of mobile phones, the internet, and the use of social media. All countries show a growing number in all three types of data. Some coverage is more complete than the other ones. For example, almost every citizen in Côte d’Ivoire possesses a mobile phone, which is not necessarily able to connect to the internet. Therefore, text communication may be more effective than using social media. However, considering the 50% illiterate rate in Côte d’Ivoire, using videos and photos on social media may be a better option in some circumstances. This chapter also looks at the software, website, and social media tools that people use in this country, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Agreed with the global trend, the internet is used more frequently during the pandemic. Meeting software, such as zoom and google meeting, gained more popularity in the workplace and in school. The user of entertainment apps, such as Tiktok, also increased during the pandemic.

To avoid potential privacy issues, all data and information presented in this book come from public sources. The most commonly used data sources include reports and open data from sites such as government health ministries, non-government organizations (e.g. World Bank and World Health Organization), and academic institutions (e.g. Washington University). The use of public data on the subject of African healthcare systems exposes and demonstrates the fact that this area is under-researched and under-attended. Some government reports only go back two to three years, and some lack continuity because the department suddenly stopped issuing reports. A similar phenomenon is also observed on the open data site. Even the World Bank, which is known for providing a consistent, reliable source, is blank in the data related to African countries. The data provided by World Bank tends to be more complete and traceable since 2014 (some from 2016 depending on the index). This implies that the data collection system has improved in recent years, and hopefully can provide stable and quality data in the near future.

Although the data sites, such as World Bank, World Bank Organization, and Global Health Data Exchange provide a lot of different types of valuable health-related data, some data on specific topics can only be retrieved from government reports or academic studies. For example, Kenya published a report named inequality trends and diagnostic in Kenya in 2020. However, the data used in the report is mainly from 1994, 2005/06, and 2015/16, leaving other years blank. The report lacks newer data and it is only published once a couple of years (sometimes there is only one report published on a certain topic.). Some less urgent topics may not even have a public report addressing them, such as insurance coverage, the average cost of hospital, the average time to call an ambulance, etc. These topics are sometimes addressed by academic research in more economically developed countries, which means they are likely to be left unaddressed and unattended in Africa.

The lack of stable and consistent data causes limitations in this book. Some data and academic sources used in this book can be dated before 2000, and some data is not sufficient enough to form a trend. There are also data from local news media and hospital websites to provide a general sense of the information. For example, the cost of the hospital varies from region to region. Therefore the data provided in this book is not sufficient to conclude all hospital costs but only to provide a rough comparison of the individual’s income.

Due to the lack of data and resources on the topic, this book has its own limitation in providing precise data information. Instead of providing accurate data sources, this book intends to provide initial insights into a vast array of health-related topics in Africa. It proposes a template for assessing and understanding the healthcare system of a region. Assuming the data collection system and the science output on healthcare in Africa will continuously improve, a more comprehensive and reliable report can be produced by future studies. Theoretically, the template structure proposed by this book and the data collected can form useful information for the academic, private, public, and non-profit sectors, providing insights on possible opportunities such as data curation, digital platform formation, price referencing, partner engagement, talent attraction and leverage, public education, and innovation.