Skip to main content

DCIS AI-TIL: Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocyte Scoring Using Artificial Intelligence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence over Infrared Images for Medical Applications and Medical Image Assisted Biomarker Discovery (MIABID 2022, AIIIMA 2022)

Abstract

Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) influence the prognosis of Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Currently, manual assessment of TIL by expert pathologists is considered a gold standard. However, there are issues with a shortage of expert pathologists and inter-observer variability. A reliable automated scoring method is yet to be developed due to the inherent complexity of DCIS duct morphology and the assessment strategy. We developed a new deep learning and spatial analysis pipeline to automatically score DCIS stromal TIL (AI-TIL) from 243 diagnostic haematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images from 127 patients. To automatically identify and segment DCIS ducts, we implemented a generative adversarial network. To identify lymphocytes, we used a pre-trained deep learning model. Our DCIS segmentation model achieved a dice overlap of 0.94 (\({\pm }0.01\)) and the cell classifier model achieved 92% accuracy compared to pathologists’ annotations. Subsequently, we automatically delineated a stromal boundary and computed the percentage of the boundary area occupied by lymphocytes for each DCIS duct. Finally, we computed TIL score as the average of all duct level scores within the slide. We observe a higher correlation between AI-TIL and pathologists (average) score for wider stomal boundaries (r = 0.66, p = \(6.0 \times 10^{-7}\), W = 0.3 mm) compared with smaller boundary (r = 0.23, p = 0.12, W = 0.03 mm). Using multivariate analysis, a low AI-TIL score was associated with an increased risk of recurrence independent of age, grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, and necrosis (hazard ratio = 0.14, 95% CI 0.038–0.51, p = 0.003, W = 0.03 mm). These results suggest that our pipeline could be used to automatically quantify stromal TIL in DCIS and integrating AI-TIL with pathologists’ visual assessment may improve DCIS recurrence risk estimation.

Y. B. Hagos and F. Sobhani—Equally contributed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Badve, S.S., Gökmen-Polar, Y.: Ductal carcinoma in situ of breast: update 2019. Pathology 51(6), 563–569 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burstein, H.J., Polyak, K., Wong, J.S., Lester, S.C., Kaelin, C.M.: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N. Engl. J. Med. 350(14), 1430–1441 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caparica, R., et al.: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in non-invasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 59, 183–192 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrio, A.V., Van Zee, K.J.: Controversies in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann. Rev. Med. 68, 197–211 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Narod, S.A., Iqbal, J., Giannakeas, V., Sopik, V., Sun, P.: Breast cancer mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA Oncol. 1(7), 888–896 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Toss, M.S., et al.: Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Mod. Pathol. 31(8), 1226–1236 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fei-Fei, X., et al.: Prognostic and predictive significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes for ductal carcinoma in situ. Oncoimmunology 10(1), 1875637 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pruneri, G., et al.: The prevalence and clinical relevance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann. Oncol. 28(2), 321–328 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hendry, S., et al.: Relationship of the breast ductal carcinoma in situ immune microenvironment with clinicopathological and genetic features. Clin. Cancer Res. 23(17), 5210–5217 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farolfi, A., et al.: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and risk of a second breast event after a ductal carcinoma in situ. Front. Oncol. 1486 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dieci, M.V., et al.: Update on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer, including recommendations to assess tils in residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy and in carcinoma in situ: a report of the international immuno-oncology biomarker working group on breast cancer. Seminars Cancer Biol. 52, 16–25 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hitchcock, C.L.: The future of telepathology for the developing world. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 135(2), 211–214 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Swisher, S.K., et al.: Interobserver agreement between pathologists assessing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer using methodology proposed by the international tils working group. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 23(7), 2242–2248 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khoury, T., Peng, X., Yan, L., Wang, D., Nagrale, V.: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: evaluating interobserver variability, heterogeneity, and fidelity of scoring core biopsies. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 150(5), 441–450 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. AbdulJabbar, K., et al.: Geospatial immune variability illuminates differential evolution of lung adenocarcinoma. Nat. Med. 26(7), 1054–1062 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raza, S.E.A., et al.: Micro-net: a unified model for segmentation of various objects in microscopy images. Med. Image Anal. 52, 160–173 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sirinukunwattana, K., Raza, S.E.A., Tsang, Y.-W., Snead, D.R.J., Cree, I.A., Rajpoot, N.M.: Locality sensitive deep learning for detection and classification of nuclei in routine colon cancer histology images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35(5), 1196–1206 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nawaz, S., Heindl, A., Koelble, K., Yuan, Y.: Beyond immune density: critical role of spatial heterogeneity in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Mod. Pathol. 28(6), 766–777 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, T.-C., Liu, M.-Y., Zhu, J.-Y., Tao, A., Kautz, J., Catanzaro, B.: High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional GANs. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8798–8807 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koyun, O.C., Yildirim, T.: Adversarial nuclei segmentation on H &E stained histopathology images. In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T., Efros, A.A.: Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1125–1134 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, Q., Koltun, V.: Photographic image synthesis with cascaded refinement networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1511–1520 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Glorot, X., Bengio, Y.: Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 249–256. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgement

We are grateful for the funding support to the TBCRC from The Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Susan G. Komen. We also recognize the contributions of the investigators who participated in TBCRC 038, including Shi Wei, Angela DeMichele, Tari King, Priscilla McAuliffe, Julie Nangia, Joanna Lee, Jennifer Tseng, Anna Maria Storniolo, Alastair M Thompson, Gaorav P Gupta, Antonio Wolff, and Ian Krop.

Y.H.B received funding from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie (No766030). Y.Y. acknowledges funding from Cancer Research UK Career Establishment Award (C45982/A21808), Breast Cancer Now (2015NovPR638), Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLGA201906), NIH U54 CA217376 and R01 CA185138, CDMRP Breast Cancer Research Program Award BC132057, CRUK Brain Tumour Awards (TARGET-GBM), European Commission ITN (H2020-MSCA-ITN-2019), Wellcome Trust (105104/Z/14/Z), and The Royal Marsden/ICR National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre. ESH received funding from the DoD (BC132057) and the NIH (1U2CCA233254-01, R01 CA185138-01) as well as from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF 19-074).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinyin Yuan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 325 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hagos, Y.B. et al. (2022). DCIS AI-TIL: Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocyte Scoring Using Artificial Intelligence. In: Kakileti, S.T., et al. Artificial Intelligence over Infrared Images for Medical Applications and Medical Image Assisted Biomarker Discovery. MIABID AIIIMA 2022 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13602. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19660-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19660-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19659-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19660-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics