Skip to main content

Responsive Design Thinking: Transitioning from Human-Centered to a Planetary-Centric Approach to Innovation. Principles and Perspectives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development (ICMTBHT 2022)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

The number of methodologies and tools to deliver sustainability goals is growing at high speed. However, for the past two decades, design thinking has consistently helped businesses reshape the experience of innovating. Today, organizations are integrating and acquiring more designers to work together with developers and engineers and generate more value for the business. The designers’ approach to problem-solving is a non-linear process that optimizes performance and drives innovation. Thinking like a designer is a necessary skill when we confront massive disruption due to the current global pandemic, unexpected climate changes, and exponential technological advances. According to Tim Brown, Executive Chair of IDEO, “thinking like a designer can shift the way organizations deliver products, processes, services and strategy” (Brown, Harvard Business Rev, 86(84):141, 2008). Through immersive consumer research, ideation, prototyping, and iteration, companies like Apple, Airbnb, Netflix or Uber came up with innovative solutions to complex business challenges. As the world is undergoing great changes due to the rapid adoption of new technologies, and the humanitarian and planetary crisis we experience, the role of designers evolves every day. So is the level of awareness of the potential long-term and unintended consequences of what they design. Planetary-centric innovation is a disruptive shift in perspective since we used to design products and services with people at the core. This paper proposes a new framework for innovation to help businesses design better products and services without sacrificing their responsibility to the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andalib, E., & Khodadadeh, Y. (2021). The role of innovative design in creating city identity and tourist attraction: Investigating Sheikh-Zahed Monument as a case study. Journal of Design Thinking, 2(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., Quayson, M., & Sarkis, J. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic digitization lessons for sustainable development of micro-and small- enterprises. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27(2021), 1989–2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.035

  • Burall, P. (1991). Green design, issues in design. The Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deniz, D. (2016). Sustainable thinking and environmental awareness through design education. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 34, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.008. ISSN 1878-0296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ***Emsi Burning Glass. (2021). https://www.economicmodeling.com/

  • Han, E. (2022). What is design thinking and why is it important. Harvard Business School, 31(05), 2022. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/what-is-design-thinking

    Google Scholar 

  • Krolikowski, et al. (2022). Design thinking to improve healthcare delivery in the intensive care unit: Promise, pitfalls, and lessons learned. Journal of Critical Care, 69, 153999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J., & Ogilvie, T. (2011). Designing for growth: A design thinking tool kit for managers. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, J. (2018). The GuruBook. In Insights from 45 pioneering entrepreneurs and leaders on business strategy and innovation. Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magistretti, S., et al. (2021a). Framing the multifaceted nature of design thinking in addressing ifferent innovation purposes. Long Range Planning, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magistretti, S., Anh Pham, C. T., & Dell’Era, C. (2021b). Enlightening the dynamic capabilities of design thinking in fostering digital transformation. Industrial Marketing Management, 97(2021), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahato, S., Phi, S., & Prats, L. (2021). Design thinking for social innovation: Secrets to success for tourism social entrepreneurs. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 49(2021), 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.10.010. ISSN 1447-6770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, R., & Maher, M. (2018). Mann, S. (2018). Integrating design thinking with sustainability science: A research through design approach. Sustainability Science, 13, 1565–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2020). The future leader - 9 skills and mindset to succeed in the next decade. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murzyn-Kupisz, M., & Hołuj, D. (2021). Fashion design education and sustainability: Towards an equilibrium between craftsmanship and artistic and business skills? Education Sciences, 11(9), 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffino, R. (2021). Raleigh, sustainable design: Aspects of sustainable product development. BioResources, 16(4), 6548–6550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savoia, A. (2019). The right it. Why so many ideas fail and how to make sure yours succeed. HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soomro, S. A., Casakin, H., & Georgiev, G. V. (2021). Sustainable design and prototyping using digital fabrication tools for education. Sustainability, 2021(13), 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoring, K., Luippold, C., & Mueller, R. (2014). The impact of cultural differences in design thinking education. Conference: Design research Society’s 2014 conference (DRS). Umeå.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilli, J. (2015). Prototyping for research and industry. Universita di Pisa, Scuola di Dottorato “Leonardo da Vinci”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, M.-S. (2021). Exploration of students’ integrative skills developed in the design thinking of a psychology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(2021), 100893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Poleac, D. (2023). Responsive Design Thinking: Transitioning from Human-Centered to a Planetary-Centric Approach to Innovation. Principles and Perspectives. In: Negrușa, A.L., Coroş, M.M. (eds) Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development. ICMTBHT 2022. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19656-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics