Skip to main content

Green Sustainable Urban Systems: The Case of Jeddah

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Innovation Forum 2022 (RIIFORUM 2022)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The governments of cities around the world are taking the green city approach into account by turning their cities’ weaknesses into opportunities. The Saudi Vision 2030 continues to support the concepts of smart growth with the vision of promoting economic growth and development. At the same time, it ensures that natural resources continue to provide the resources and environmental services that strengthen the foundation of the country. The paper gives an overview of the concepts and principles of green cities and examines the available green sustainable urban tools that may be appropriate for Jeddah City. to help it transform into a green city. The current research adopts the triangulation model of mixed methods that include analytical literature review, questionnaire, and case study analysis. The paper reviews the most common and important Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of the global Green Rating Systems (GRS) for sustainable cities. The analytical literature review for the tools' official technical manuals and professional exploratory surveys that preceded this research has been critical to confirm the applicability of the suggested system and its KPIs. The sustainable city in UAE has been selected as a case study to be analyzed and employed in developing the suggested SGRS. The results suggested a Saudi Green Rating System (SGRS) that includes eight categories (One required category, 6 mandatory credit categories, and one optional category) with thirty-one KPI, a total weight of 80 points. The suggested GSRS can aid the required transformation in Saudi Cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. UN-Habitat.: Urban themes. 2012. Available from https://unhabitat.org/urban-themes/climate-change/

  2. Hellström, T.: Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation: the structure of eco-innovation concepts. Sustain. Dev. 15(3), 148–159 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohamed, M., et al.: Urban heat island effects on megacities in desert environments using spatial network analysis and remote sensing data: a case study from western Saudi Arabia. J. Remote. Sens., SI Underst. Ur-Ban Syst. Using Remote. Sens. 13(10), 1941 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mohamed, M.: Using rating systems as a guide tool for consultancy in maintenance work (LEED as a case study). In: OMAINTEC 2017, the 15th international operation & maintenance conference in the Arab countries, (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Communities, S., Council, U. S. G. B.: STAR community rating system. (2007). [cited 2019]. Available from http://www.starcommunities.org/

  6. Bernardi, E., et al.: An analysis of the most adopted rating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings. Sustain. 9(7), (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Artmann, M., Inostroza, L., Fan, P.: Urban sprawl, compact urban development and green cities. How much do we know, how much do we agree? Ecol. Indic. 96, 3–9 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Artmann, M., et al.: How smart growth and green infrastructure can mutually support each other—A conceptual framework for compact and green cities. Ecol. Ind. 96, 10–22 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Richter, B., Behnisch, M.: Integrated evaluation framework for environmental planning in the context of compact green cities. Ecol. Ind. 96, 38–53 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandeli, K. N.: The realities of integrating physical planning and local management into urban development: A case study of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Habitat Int. 32(4), 512-533 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. LEGRAND.: Legrand and the sustainable development goals: Integrate the economic, environmental and social components of sustainable development in a balanced way. (2017). Available from http://www.legrand.com/EN/sustainable-development-description_12847.html

  12. El Ghorab, H.K., Shalaby, H.A.: Eco and Green cities as new approaches for planning and developing cities in Egypt. Alex. Eng. J. 55(1), 495–503 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Iwan, S., Thompson, R.G., Kijewska, K.: 2nd International conference green Cities 2016—green logistics for greener cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 16, 1–3 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jollands, N.: How to become a green city. (2016). [cited 2019]. Available from https://www.ebrd.com/news/2016/how-to-become-a-green-city.html

  15. Maria-Laura, et al.: Green cities—urban planning models of the future. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. ADB, A.D.B.: Hue GrEEEn city action plan, p. 60. Vietnam (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. IGBC.: Green Cities. Indian green building council. (2015). [cited 2018]. Available from https://igbc.in/igbc/

  18. Lehmann, S.: Green urbanism: formulating a seriesof holistic principles. SAPIEN.S. 3(2), (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. European, C., Directorate-General. E for.: Indicators for sustainable cities. Publications office (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dantes.: Environmental Performance Indicators, EPI. (2006). [cited 2018]. Available from https://dantes.info/Tools&Methods/Environmentalinformation/enviro_info_spi_epi.html

  21. Evaluation, B.: Triangulation. (2014) Available from http://www.betterevaluation.org/en/evaluation-options/triangulation

  22. Olsen, W.: Triangulation in social research: qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. In: Haralambos, M., Holborn. H (eds.) Developments in sociology causeway. Manchester Research Explorer (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, J.: How to find the mean, median, mode, range, and standard deviation. (2018). [cited 2018], Available from https://sciencing.com/median-mode-range-standard-deviation-4599485.html

  24. Al-Kesmi, S., Mohammed, M., AlSurf, M.: A proposal for green urban sustainable system. In: Meamaryat internal conference MIC 2018, Effat University, Jeddah, KSA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mohamed, M., et al.: Sick neighborhood syndromes in hot dry climate. In: The 4th meamary at international conference MIC20, designing for the desert, Effat University, Jeddah, KSA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fatani, K., Mohamed, M., Al-Khateeb, S.: Survey based sustainable socio-cultural guidelines for neighbourhood design in Jeddah. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 385, 012050 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohamed, M.: Green Building Rating Systems as Sustainability Assessment Tools: Case Study Analysis, In: Fuentes-Bargues, J. L., Bastante-Ceca, M. J., Hufnagel, L., Mihai, F. C., Iatu, C., (eds.) Sustainability assessment at the 21st century, IntechOpen (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vierra, S.: Green buildings standards and certification systems. Whole building design guide. (2016). [cited 2019], Available from https://www.wbdg.org/resources/green-building-standards-and-certification-systems

  29. French Ministry in charge of housing and urban development, a.t.C. Council of European Municipalities and Regions, and Apbisonalaitfos development.: Reference Framework of sustainable cities, RFSC. (2008). [cited 2022 March]

    Google Scholar 

  30. Eurostat.: City statistics (Urban audit). (1981). [cited 2022 May]. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/cities/data/database

  31. Council, U. S. G. B.: Leadership in energy and environmental design. (2000). [cited 2019]. Available from https://new.usgbc.org/leed

  32. Habitat, U.: City prosperity initiative. (2012). [cited 2022 May]. Available from https://unhabitat.org/programme/city-prosperity-initiative

  33. Council, A. D. U. P.: Pearl—BRS—Pearl Building Rating System (PBRS). (2010). [cited 2019]. Available from http://www3.cec.org/islandora-gb/en/islandora/object/greenbuilding%3A101

  34. GORD, G. O. F. R. D.: Global Sustainability Assessment System (GSAS). (2007). [cited 2019]. Available from https://www.gord.qa/gsas-trust

  35. Group, C. C. C. L.: Climate positive development program, CPDP. London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Africa, G. B. C. S.: Green star tools. (2007). [cited 2019]. Available from https://gbcsa.org.za/certify/green-star-sa/

  37. Siemens.: City performance tool by Siemens. (2016). [cited 2022 Feb]. Available from https://new.siemens.com/global/en/products/services/iot-siemens/public-sector/city-performance-tool.html

  38. Council, I. G. B.: IGBC Rating Systems. (2001). [cited 2019]. Available from https://igbc.in/igbc/

  39. Architecture, B.: Dubai sustainable City. (2013). [cited 2022 May ]. Available from https://www.baharash.com/architecture-design/dubai-sustainable-city/

  40. Selim , S., El-Bana, N., Taleb, H.: Optimising sustainability at an urban level: a case study of Dubai sustainable city. WIT transactions on ecology and the environment. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 193, 985–995 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Propsearch.ae.: The sustainable city. (2015) [cited 2022 May ]. Available from https://propsearch.ae/dubai/the-sustainable-city

  42. NEXUS, S.: The sustainable city—Sustainablity solutions. (2019). [cited 2022 May]. Available from https://www.thesustainablecity.ae/sustainability/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mady Mohamed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Questionnaire Results, by Authors

Classification

Statistical parameters

Scale

Frequency

Category

Mean

Mode

Median

Standard deviation

1–5

5–6

6–8

9–10

Agree

Disagree

Eco Vision

8.96

10

10

1.614

10

10

52

  

Land use planning & Built environment

8.99

10

10

1.682

4

14

45

  

Compact City Planning

 

68

4

Affordable Housing

 

67

5

Green Buildings

 

66

6

Urban Heat Island Mitigation

 

66

6

Infill and Redevelopments

 

67

5

Health & Well-being

9.33

10

10

1.3

2

10

60

  

Preservation and restoration of water bodies and eco-sensitive zones

 

68

4

Public green and open spaces

 

68

4

Accessibility to public green and open spaces

 

68

4

Environmental Monitoring

 

68

4

Solid waste management

 

66

6

Regional, recycled materials

 

66

6

Community Health

 

66

6

Safe community

 

67

5

Sustainable Mobility

8.89

10

10

1.896

5

13

54

  

Sustainable mobility plan

 

68

4

Barrier-free Accessibility

 

66

6

Access to mass transit facilities

 

68

4

Pedestrian network

 

70

2

transportation choices

 

66

6

Travel plan

 

69

3

Water, energy, & infrastructure

9.29

10

10

1.486

3

8

61

  

Water Efficiency Plan

 

70

2

Rainwater harvesting

 

67

5

Waste water treatment & reuse

 

67

5

Energy efficiency plan

 

68

4

Renewable energy

 

68

4

Green infrastructure

 

65

7

Food system

 

64

8

Information & communication technology

8.79

10

10

1.883

5

17

50

  

ICT applications

 

69

3

Equity & empowerment

8.57

10

10

1.934

4

15

51

  

Civic engagement

 

68

4

Environmental justice

 

64

8

Civil human rights

 

66

6

equitable services and access

 

62

10

Education opportunities

 

67

5

Local economy

 

67

5

Sustainable awareness

 

66

6

Employment opportunities

 

69

3

Innovation in city planning

8.89

10

10

1.858

8

12

52

  

Innovation in city planning

 

70

2

Innovation practices

 

67

5

Good governance

 

66

6

Total

72 participants

  

Appendix 2: Final Proposed SGRS—Source Authors

No

Category

KPI

Weight

I

Eco vision/required

No

Item

Required

II

Land use planning & Built environment

1

Compact city planning

4

2

Affordable housing

4

3

Green buildings

2

4

Urban heat island mitigation

3

5

Infill and redevelopments

2

Sub-total

 

15

III

Health & well-being

6

Availability & accessibility of public open spaces

4

7

Environmental monitoring

2

8

Community health

2

9

Safe community

2

Sub-total

 

10

IV

Sustainable mobility

10

Sustainable mobility plan

Required

11

Barrier-free accessibility

Required

12

Pedestrian network

2

13

transportation choices

2

14

Travel plan

4

15

Equitable services and access

2

Sub-total

 

10

V

Water, energy, & infrastructure Management

16

Water efficiency plan

5

17

Energy efficiency plan

5

18

Efficient infrastructure

2

19

Preservation and restoration of water bodies and eco-sensitive zones

2

20

Solid waste management

2

21

Regional, recycled materials

2

22

Food system

2

Sub-total

 

20

VI

Information & communication Technology

23

ICT Applications

5

Sub-total

 

5

VII

Equity & empowerment

24

Civic engagement

3

25

Environmental justice

2

26

Civil human rights

2

27

Education opportunities

4

28

Sustainable awareness

2

29

Employment opportunities

3

Sub-total

 

16

VIII

Innovation in city planning/optional

30

Innovation practices

2

31

Good governance

2

Sub-total

 

4

Total credits for the KPIs

 

80

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mohamed, M., ALSurf, M., AL-Kesmi, S. (2023). Green Sustainable Urban Systems: The Case of Jeddah. In: Visvizi, A., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M. (eds) Research and Innovation Forum 2022. RIIFORUM 2022. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19560-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19560-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19559-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19560-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics