Abstract
The governments of cities around the world are taking the green city approach into account by turning their cities’ weaknesses into opportunities. The Saudi Vision 2030 continues to support the concepts of smart growth with the vision of promoting economic growth and development. At the same time, it ensures that natural resources continue to provide the resources and environmental services that strengthen the foundation of the country. The paper gives an overview of the concepts and principles of green cities and examines the available green sustainable urban tools that may be appropriate for Jeddah City. to help it transform into a green city. The current research adopts the triangulation model of mixed methods that include analytical literature review, questionnaire, and case study analysis. The paper reviews the most common and important Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of the global Green Rating Systems (GRS) for sustainable cities. The analytical literature review for the tools' official technical manuals and professional exploratory surveys that preceded this research has been critical to confirm the applicability of the suggested system and its KPIs. The sustainable city in UAE has been selected as a case study to be analyzed and employed in developing the suggested SGRS. The results suggested a Saudi Green Rating System (SGRS) that includes eight categories (One required category, 6 mandatory credit categories, and one optional category) with thirty-one KPI, a total weight of 80 points. The suggested GSRS can aid the required transformation in Saudi Cities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
UN-Habitat.: Urban themes. 2012. Available from https://unhabitat.org/urban-themes/climate-change/
Hellström, T.: Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation: the structure of eco-innovation concepts. Sustain. Dev. 15(3), 148–159 (2007)
Mohamed, M., et al.: Urban heat island effects on megacities in desert environments using spatial network analysis and remote sensing data: a case study from western Saudi Arabia. J. Remote. Sens., SI Underst. Ur-Ban Syst. Using Remote. Sens. 13(10), 1941 (2021)
Mohamed, M.: Using rating systems as a guide tool for consultancy in maintenance work (LEED as a case study). In: OMAINTEC 2017, the 15th international operation & maintenance conference in the Arab countries, (2017)
Communities, S., Council, U. S. G. B.: STAR community rating system. (2007). [cited 2019]. Available from http://www.starcommunities.org/
Bernardi, E., et al.: An analysis of the most adopted rating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings. Sustain. 9(7), (2017)
Artmann, M., Inostroza, L., Fan, P.: Urban sprawl, compact urban development and green cities. How much do we know, how much do we agree? Ecol. Indic. 96, 3–9 (2019)
Artmann, M., et al.: How smart growth and green infrastructure can mutually support each other—A conceptual framework for compact and green cities. Ecol. Ind. 96, 10–22 (2019)
Richter, B., Behnisch, M.: Integrated evaluation framework for environmental planning in the context of compact green cities. Ecol. Ind. 96, 38–53 (2019)
Mandeli, K. N.: The realities of integrating physical planning and local management into urban development: A case study of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Habitat Int. 32(4), 512-533 (2008)
LEGRAND.: Legrand and the sustainable development goals: Integrate the economic, environmental and social components of sustainable development in a balanced way. (2017). Available from http://www.legrand.com/EN/sustainable-development-description_12847.html
El Ghorab, H.K., Shalaby, H.A.: Eco and Green cities as new approaches for planning and developing cities in Egypt. Alex. Eng. J. 55(1), 495–503 (2016)
Iwan, S., Thompson, R.G., Kijewska, K.: 2nd International conference green Cities 2016—green logistics for greener cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 16, 1–3 (2016)
Jollands, N.: How to become a green city. (2016). [cited 2019]. Available from https://www.ebrd.com/news/2016/how-to-become-a-green-city.html
Maria-Laura, et al.: Green cities—urban planning models of the future. (2014)
ADB, A.D.B.: Hue GrEEEn city action plan, p. 60. Vietnam (2015)
IGBC.: Green Cities. Indian green building council. (2015). [cited 2018]. Available from https://igbc.in/igbc/
Lehmann, S.: Green urbanism: formulating a seriesof holistic principles. SAPIEN.S. 3(2), (2010)
European, C., Directorate-General. E for.: Indicators for sustainable cities. Publications office (2018)
Dantes.: Environmental Performance Indicators, EPI. (2006). [cited 2018]. Available from https://dantes.info/Tools&Methods/Environmentalinformation/enviro_info_spi_epi.html
Evaluation, B.: Triangulation. (2014) Available from http://www.betterevaluation.org/en/evaluation-options/triangulation
Olsen, W.: Triangulation in social research: qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. In: Haralambos, M., Holborn. H (eds.) Developments in sociology causeway. Manchester Research Explorer (2004)
Smith, J.: How to find the mean, median, mode, range, and standard deviation. (2018). [cited 2018], Available from https://sciencing.com/median-mode-range-standard-deviation-4599485.html
Al-Kesmi, S., Mohammed, M., AlSurf, M.: A proposal for green urban sustainable system. In: Meamaryat internal conference MIC 2018, Effat University, Jeddah, KSA (2018)
Mohamed, M., et al.: Sick neighborhood syndromes in hot dry climate. In: The 4th meamary at international conference MIC20, designing for the desert, Effat University, Jeddah, KSA (2020)
Fatani, K., Mohamed, M., Al-Khateeb, S.: Survey based sustainable socio-cultural guidelines for neighbourhood design in Jeddah. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 385, 012050 (2019)
Mohamed, M.: Green Building Rating Systems as Sustainability Assessment Tools: Case Study Analysis, In: Fuentes-Bargues, J. L., Bastante-Ceca, M. J., Hufnagel, L., Mihai, F. C., Iatu, C., (eds.) Sustainability assessment at the 21st century, IntechOpen (2020)
Vierra, S.: Green buildings standards and certification systems. Whole building design guide. (2016). [cited 2019], Available from https://www.wbdg.org/resources/green-building-standards-and-certification-systems
French Ministry in charge of housing and urban development, a.t.C. Council of European Municipalities and Regions, and Apbisonalaitfos development.: Reference Framework of sustainable cities, RFSC. (2008). [cited 2022 March]
Eurostat.: City statistics (Urban audit). (1981). [cited 2022 May]. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/cities/data/database
Council, U. S. G. B.: Leadership in energy and environmental design. (2000). [cited 2019]. Available from https://new.usgbc.org/leed
Habitat, U.: City prosperity initiative. (2012). [cited 2022 May]. Available from https://unhabitat.org/programme/city-prosperity-initiative
Council, A. D. U. P.: Pearl—BRS—Pearl Building Rating System (PBRS). (2010). [cited 2019]. Available from http://www3.cec.org/islandora-gb/en/islandora/object/greenbuilding%3A101
GORD, G. O. F. R. D.: Global Sustainability Assessment System (GSAS). (2007). [cited 2019]. Available from https://www.gord.qa/gsas-trust
Group, C. C. C. L.: Climate positive development program, CPDP. London (2009)
Africa, G. B. C. S.: Green star tools. (2007). [cited 2019]. Available from https://gbcsa.org.za/certify/green-star-sa/
Siemens.: City performance tool by Siemens. (2016). [cited 2022 Feb]. Available from https://new.siemens.com/global/en/products/services/iot-siemens/public-sector/city-performance-tool.html
Council, I. G. B.: IGBC Rating Systems. (2001). [cited 2019]. Available from https://igbc.in/igbc/
Architecture, B.: Dubai sustainable City. (2013). [cited 2022 May ]. Available from https://www.baharash.com/architecture-design/dubai-sustainable-city/
Selim , S., El-Bana, N., Taleb, H.: Optimising sustainability at an urban level: a case study of Dubai sustainable city. WIT transactions on ecology and the environment. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 193, 985–995 (2015)
Propsearch.ae.: The sustainable city. (2015) [cited 2022 May ]. Available from https://propsearch.ae/dubai/the-sustainable-city
NEXUS, S.: The sustainable city—Sustainablity solutions. (2019). [cited 2022 May]. Available from https://www.thesustainablecity.ae/sustainability/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Questionnaire Results, by Authors
Classification | Statistical parameters | Scale | Frequency | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | Mean | Mode | Median | Standard deviation | 1–5 | 5–6 | 6–8 | 9–10 | Agree | Disagree |
Eco Vision | 8.96 | 10 | 10 | 1.614 | – | 10 | 10 | 52 | ||
Land use planning & Built environment | 8.99 | 10 | 10 | 1.682 | 4 | − | 14 | 45 | ||
Compact City Planning | 68 | 4 | ||||||||
Affordable Housing | 67 | 5 | ||||||||
Green Buildings | 66 | 6 | ||||||||
Urban Heat Island Mitigation | 66 | 6 | ||||||||
Infill and Redevelopments | 67 | 5 | ||||||||
Health & Well-being | 9.33 | 10 | 10 | 1.3 | 2 | − | 10 | 60 | ||
Preservation and restoration of water bodies and eco-sensitive zones | 68 | 4 | ||||||||
Public green and open spaces | 68 | 4 | ||||||||
Accessibility to public green and open spaces | 68 | 4 | ||||||||
Environmental Monitoring | 68 | 4 | ||||||||
Solid waste management | 66 | 6 | ||||||||
Regional, recycled materials | 66 | 6 | ||||||||
Community Health | 66 | 6 | ||||||||
Safe community | 67 | 5 | ||||||||
Sustainable Mobility | 8.89 | 10 | 10 | 1.896 | 5 | − | 13 | 54 | ||
Sustainable mobility plan | 68 | 4 | ||||||||
Barrier-free Accessibility | 66 | 6 | ||||||||
Access to mass transit facilities | 68 | 4 | ||||||||
Pedestrian network | 70 | 2 | ||||||||
transportation choices | 66 | 6 | ||||||||
Travel plan | 69 | 3 | ||||||||
Water, energy, & infrastructure | 9.29 | 10 | 10 | 1.486 | 3 | − | 8 | 61 | ||
Water Efficiency Plan | 70 | 2 | ||||||||
Rainwater harvesting | 67 | 5 | ||||||||
Waste water treatment & reuse | 67 | 5 | ||||||||
Energy efficiency plan | 68 | 4 | ||||||||
Renewable energy | 68 | 4 | ||||||||
Green infrastructure | 65 | 7 | ||||||||
Food system | 64 | 8 | ||||||||
Information & communication technology | 8.79 | 10 | 10 | 1.883 | 5 | − | 17 | 50 | ||
ICT applications | 69 | 3 | ||||||||
Equity & empowerment | 8.57 | 10 | 10 | 1.934 | 4 | − | 15 | 51 | ||
Civic engagement | 68 | 4 | ||||||||
Environmental justice | 64 | 8 | ||||||||
Civil human rights | 66 | 6 | ||||||||
equitable services and access | 62 | 10 | ||||||||
Education opportunities | 67 | 5 | ||||||||
Local economy | 67 | 5 | ||||||||
Sustainable awareness | 66 | 6 | ||||||||
Employment opportunities | 69 | 3 | ||||||||
Innovation in city planning | 8.89 | 10 | 10 | 1.858 | 8 | − | 12 | 52 | ||
Innovation in city planning | 70 | 2 | ||||||||
Innovation practices | 67 | 5 | ||||||||
Good governance | 66 | 6 | ||||||||
Total | 72 participants |
Appendix 2: Final Proposed SGRS—Source Authors
No | Category | KPI | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|---|
I | Eco vision/required | No | Item | Required |
II | Land use planning & Built environment | 1 | Compact city planning | 4 |
2 | Affordable housing | 4 | ||
3 | Green buildings | 2 | ||
4 | Urban heat island mitigation | 3 | ||
5 | Infill and redevelopments | 2 | ||
Sub-total | 15 | |||
III | Health & well-being | 6 | Availability & accessibility of public open spaces | 4 |
7 | Environmental monitoring | 2 | ||
8 | Community health | 2 | ||
9 | Safe community | 2 | ||
Sub-total | 10 | |||
IV | Sustainable mobility | 10 | Sustainable mobility plan | Required |
11 | Barrier-free accessibility | Required | ||
12 | Pedestrian network | 2 | ||
13 | transportation choices | 2 | ||
14 | Travel plan | 4 | ||
15 | Equitable services and access | 2 | ||
Sub-total | 10 | |||
V | Water, energy, & infrastructure Management | 16 | Water efficiency plan | 5 |
17 | Energy efficiency plan | 5 | ||
18 | Efficient infrastructure | 2 | ||
19 | Preservation and restoration of water bodies and eco-sensitive zones | 2 | ||
20 | Solid waste management | 2 | ||
21 | Regional, recycled materials | 2 | ||
22 | Food system | 2 | ||
Sub-total | 20 | |||
VI | Information & communication Technology | 23 | ICT Applications | 5 |
Sub-total | 5 | |||
VII | Equity & empowerment | 24 | Civic engagement | 3 |
25 | Environmental justice | 2 | ||
26 | Civil human rights | 2 | ||
27 | Education opportunities | 4 | ||
28 | Sustainable awareness | 2 | ||
29 | Employment opportunities | 3 | ||
Sub-total | 16 | |||
VIII | Innovation in city planning/optional | 30 | Innovation practices | 2 |
31 | Good governance | 2 | ||
Sub-total | 4 | |||
Total credits for the KPIs | 80 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mohamed, M., ALSurf, M., AL-Kesmi, S. (2023). Green Sustainable Urban Systems: The Case of Jeddah. In: Visvizi, A., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M. (eds) Research and Innovation Forum 2022. RIIFORUM 2022. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19560-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19560-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19559-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19560-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)