Abstract
Gaining gender parity and empowerment of women across the globe is one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Women’s equality is an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development, and the success of all SDGs depends on the achievement of Goal 5—the attainment of gender equality. Unfortunately, the targeted elimination of many of the structural barriers that restrict women’s rights in private and public spheres has halted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. On October 28, 2020, an article in NPR noted that “[w]omen are seeing the fabric of their lives unravel during the coronavirus pandemic … the pandemic is wreaking havoc on households, and women are bearing the brunt of it”. Disease outbreaks have traditionally exacerbated gender inequality and increased vulnerabilities borne by women, besides derailing hard-won progress. During lockdowns necessitated by the pandemic, women are at greater risk of domestic violence perpetrated by intimate partners and family members. Concurrently, women also suffer from decreased access to violence prevention and support services. Additionally, they are also disproportionately disadvantaged by reduced access to sexual and reproductive health services. Hard-fought gains for women’s rights are also under threat across the globe.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious national concern that has the potential to be exacerbated in scope and impact by the COVID-19 pandemic. Public safety measures adopted during COVID-19—including physical distancing, self-quarantining, and “safer-at-home” mandates intended to prevent widespread infection—decimated economic choices and left many IPV victims trapped in close contact with their abusers. Among immigrant victims of IPV in US, disclosure, support-seeking behavior, and resource uptake were remarkably low in pre-COVID-19 times. Yet, the impact of COVID-19 on intimate partner violence (IPV) support services programs catering to immigrant groups in US is a topic that remains largely unexplored. The current paper delineates the impact of COVID-19 on the support-seeking and service utilization among immigrant victims of IPV living in the US. It incorporates the conceptual framework of intersectionality, which recognizes that women of color experience life and negotiate a pandemic through multiple systems of oppression.
Immigrant women experience the same stressors and trauma of IPV as women born in the US, but they face the added burdens of immigration status and negotiate the challenges of the pandemic differently. The IPV experiences of immigrant women in the US during COVID-19 can be exacerbated by a set of factors that are peculiar to their immigrant status. These may include limited English language proficiency, unique sociocultural and religious norms, changing legal status due to immigration, lack of family support, stigma of IPV, uncertain or undocumented immigration status and threats of deportation as a means of control by the abuser, and increasing social isolation. Despite IPV program growth, service gaps remain and have been magnified by COVID-19. This is especially true for immigrant women who are a marginalized and vulnerable survivor population in the US.
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic can reverse the limited progress made on gender equality and women’s rights globally. For immigrant women in the US the coronavirus outbreak can aggravate existing inequalities besides restricting an already limited access to essential support services across every sphere—from health to economy, to security and social protection. It is essential to create targeted responses to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on immigrant women and to ensure that the long-term recovery benefits them and creates a path toward achievement of Goal 5. The chapter expects to add to research on a proposed SDG 18 which will create a framework of accessible communication strategies for all. The latter in turn can precipitate a reimagined IPV service delivery—rooted not only in the traditionalist feminist paradigm but also in the context of intersectionality that strives to address the unique experiences of immigrant battered women. The proposed SDG 18 (Communication for all) can play an important role in overcoming barriers toward attainment of Goal 5 among immigrant women in the US, by highlighting on intersecting issues of displacement and marginalization during and after the pandemic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, M. (1998). Alienation and marital violence against South Asian immigrant women in the United States. In D. Kaleki-Fishman (Ed.), Designs for alienation: Exploring diverse realities (pp. 175–196). University of Jyvaskyla.
Ackard, D. M., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2002). Date violence and date rape among adolescents: Associations with disordered eating behaviors and psychological health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(5), 455–473.
Ahmad, F., Riaz, S., Barata, P., & Stewart, D. E. (2004). Patriarchal beliefs and perceptions of abuse among South Asian immigrant women. Violence Against Women, 10(3), 262–282.
Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359(9314), 1331–1336.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.
Dasgupta, S. D. (1996). Feminist consciousness in women centered Hindi films. Journal of Popular Culture, 30(1), 173–189.
Dasgupta, S. D. (Ed.). (2007). Body evidence: Intimate violence against South Asian women in America. Rutgers University Press.
Dicola, D., & Spaar, E. (2016, October 15). Intimate partner violence. American Family Physician, 94(8), 646–651. PMID: 27929227.
Douglas, E. M., & Hines, D. A. (2011). The reported availability of us domestic violence services to victims who vary by immigration status, primary language, and disability. Partner Abuse, 2(4), 427–451.
Emezue, C. (2020). Digital or digitally delivered responses to domestic and intimate partner violence during COVID-19. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(3), e19831.
Evans, M. L., Lindauer, M., & Farrell, M. E. (2020). A pandemic within a pandemic—Intimate partner violence during Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(24), 2302–2304.
Fielding, S. (2020). In quarantine with an abuser: Surge in domestic violence reports linked to coronavirus. The Guardian, 3.
Foster, H., & Fletcher, A. (2020). Women’s safety NSW update: Impacts on COVID-19 on domestic and family violence in NSW. Retrieved July, 5, 2020.
Gelles, R. J. (1997). Intimate violence in families. Sage.
Glass, N., Clough, A., Case, J., Hanson, G., Barnes-Hoyt, J., Waterbury, A., Alhusen, J., Ehrensaft, M., Grace, K. T., & Perrin, N. (2015). A safety app to respond to dating violence for college women and their friends: The MyPlan study randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1–13.
Graham, L. M., Jensen, T. M., Givens, A. D., Bowen, G. L., & Rizo, C. F. (2019). Intimate partner violence among same-sex couples in college: A propensity score analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(8), 1583–1610.
Greenwood, R. M. (2008). Intersectional political consciousness: Appreciation for intragroup differences and solidarity in diverse groups. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(1), 36–47.
Gunraj, A., & Howard, J. (2020). Why is the COVID-19 pandemic linked to more gender-based violence. Canadian Women.
Hamm, S. (2001). Information communications technologies and violence against women. The Society for International Development, 44(3), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1110259
Hegarty, K., Tarzia, L., Valpied, J., Murray, E., Humphreys, C., Taft, A., Novy, K., Gold, L., & Glass, N. (2019). An online healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence (I-DECIDE): A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Public Health, 4(6), e301–e310.
Hurwitz, E. J. H., Gupta, J., Liu, R., Silverman, J. G., & Raj, A. (2006). Intimate partner violence associated with poor health outcomes in US South Asian women. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 8(3), 251–261.
Kantamneni, N. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marginalized populations in the United States: A research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 103439.
Kelkar, M. (2012). South Asian immigration in the United States: A gendered perspective. Harvard Journal of Asian American Policy Review, 22, 55–60.
Koziol-McLain, J., Vandal, A. C., Wilson, D., Nada-Raja, S., Dobbs, T., McLean, C., Sisk, R., Eden, K. B., & Glass, N. E. (2018). Efficacy of a web-based safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(1), e8.
Liang, B., Goodman, L., Tummala-Narra, P., & Weintraub, S. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1–2), 71–84.
Moreira, D. N., & da Costa, M. P. (2020). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in the precipitation of intimate partner violence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 71, 101606.
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. (2020). Why do victims stay? Retrieved August 6, 2021, from https://ncadv.org/why-do-victims-stay
Olaniran, B. A. (2021). ICTs and Domestic Violence (DV): Exploring Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). International Journal of Big Data and Analytics in Healthcare (IJBDAH), 6(2), 31–44.
Pfitzner, N., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & True, J. (2020). Responding to the ‘shadow pandemic’: Practitioner views on the nature of and responses to violence against women in Victoria, Australia during the COVID-19 restrictions.
Poole, A. K. (2018). The UN sustainable development goals and the biocultural heritage lacuna: Where is goal number 18?. In From biocultural homogenization to biocultural conservation (pp. 315–331). Springer.
Powell, A., & Henry, N. (2018). Digital harassment and abuse of adult Australians: A summary report. RMIT University.
Reuter, T. R., Newcomb, M. E., Whitton, S. W., & Mustanski, B. (2017, January). Intimate Partner Violence Victimization in LGBT Young Adults: Demographic Differences and Associations with Health Behaviors. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000031. Epub 2016 Jan 25. PMID: 28451465; PMCID: PMC5403162.
Sabri, B., Hartley, M., Saha, J., Murray, S., Glass, N., & Campbell, J. C. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on women’s health and safety: A study of immigrant survivors of intimate partner violence. Health Care for Women International, 41(11–12), 1294–1312.
Sen, G. (2015). Goal 5–Achieving gender equality and empowering women and girls: Is SDG 5 missing something? UN Chronicle, 51(4).
Servaes, J. (2017). Introduction: From MDGs to SDGs. In Sustainable Development Goals in the Asian Context (pp. 1–21). Springer.
Slakoff, D. C., Aujla, W., & PenzeyMoog, E. (2020). The role of service providers, technology, and mass media when home isn’t safe for intimate partner violence victims: best practices and recommendations in the era of CoViD-19 and beyond. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(8), 2779–2788.
Suter, E. A. (2018). The promise of contrapuntal and intersectional methods for advancing critical interpersonal and family communication research. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 123–139.
Tripathi, S., & Azhar, S. (2020). A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions impacting South Asian Women in the United States. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020957987
United Nations. (2016). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
Upadhyay, U. D., Vyas, A. N., Ghosh, A., & Akram, S. A. (2002). Brown paper: The health of South Asians in the United States. The South Asian Public Health Association (SAPHA).
Van Tulder, R. (2018). Business and the sustainable development goals: A framework for effective corporate involvement. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.
Varughese, J. (2017). Historical & cultural factors in ethnic identity formation of Asian–Indian Immigrants: Understanding the context of care. In J. Varughese (Ed.), Counselling Asian Indian immigrant families: A pastoral psychotherapeutic model (pp. 21–54). Palgrave Macmillan.
UNGA. (2015). United Nations General Assembly resolution 70/1, transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, A/79/L.1 undocs.org/A/RES/70/1.
Yoshioka, M. R., Gilbert, L., El-Bassel, N., & Baig-Amin, M. (2003). Social support and disclosure of abuse: Comparing South Asian, African American, and Hispanic Battered Women. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 171–180.
Yusha’u, M. J. (2021). SDG18—The missing ventilator: An introduction to the 2030 agenda for development. In The Palgrave handbook of international communication and sustainable development (pp. 53–75). Palgrave Macmillan.
Yusha’u, M. J., & Servaes, J. (2021). Communication for sustainable development in the age of COVID-19. In The Palgrave handbook of international communication and sustainable development (pp. 3–30). Palgrave Macmillan.
Zero, O., & Geary, M. (2020). COVID-19 and intimate partner violence: A call to action. Rhode Island Medical Journal, 103(5), 57–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dasgupta, S. (2023). COVID-19, Intimate Partner Violence, and Immigrant Women: SDG 18 and Overcoming Communication Barriers to Attain Goal 5. In: Servaes, J., Yusha'u, M.J. (eds) SDG18 Communication for All, Volume 2. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19459-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19459-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19458-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19459-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)