Skip to main content

Knowledge Graph Induction Enabling Recommending and Trend Analysis: A Corporate Research Community Use Case

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2022 (ISWC 2022)

Abstract

A research division plays an important role of driving innovation in an organization. Drawing insights, following trends, keeping abreast of new research, and formulating strategies are increasingly becoming more challenging for both researchers and executives as the amount of information grows in both velocity and volume. In this paper we present a use case of how a corporate research community, IBM Research, utilizes Semantic Web technologies to induce a unified Knowledge Graph from both structured and textual data obtained by integrating various applications used by the community related to research projects, academic papers, datasets, achievements and recognition. In order to make the Knowledge Graph more accessible to application developers, we identified a set of common patterns for exploiting the induced knowledge and exposed them as APIs. Those patterns were born out of user research which identified the most valuable use cases or user pain points to be alleviated. We outline two distinct scenarios: recommendation and analytics for business use. We will discuss these scenarios in detail and provide an empirical evaluation on entity recommendation specifically. The methodology used and the lessons learned from this work can be applied to other organizations facing similar challenges.

N. Mihindukulasooriya, M. Sava, G. Rossiello and Md. F. M. Chowdhury—Equal contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://blog.dblp.org/2022/03/02/dblp-in-rdf/.

References

  1. Al-Aswadi, F.N., Chan, H.Y., Gan, K.H.: Automatic ontology construction from text: a review from shallow to deep learning trend. Artif. Intell. Rev. 53(6), 3901–3928 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09782-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Albrecht, J., Belger, A., Blum, R., Zimmermann, R.: Business analytics on knowledge graphs for market trend analysis. In: LWDA, pp. 371–376 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angioni, S., Salatino, A.A., Osborne, F., Recupero, D.R., Motta, E.: Integrating knowledge graphs for analysing academia and industry dynamics. In: Bellatreche, L., et al. (eds.) TPDL/ADBIS -2020. CCIS, vol. 1260, pp. 219–225. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55814-7_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Heidari, G., Ramadan, A., Stocker, M., Auer, S.: Leveraging a federation of knowledge graphs to improve faceted search in digital libraries. In: Berget, G., Hall, M.M., Brenn, D., Kumpulainen, S. (eds.) TPDL 2021. LNCS, vol. 12866, pp. 141–152. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86324-1_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R.: Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 66(11), 2215–2222 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cabot, P.H., Navigli, R.: REBEL: relation extraction by end-to-end language generation. In: EMNLP (Findings), pp. 2370–2381. Association for Computational Linguistics (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cai, X., Xie, L., Tian, R., Cui, Z.: Explicable recommendation based on knowledge graph. Expert Syst. Appl. 15, 117035 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlson, A., Betteridge, J., Kisiel, B., Settles, B., Hruschka Jr., E.R., Mitchell, T.M.: Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. In: AAAI. AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chowdhury, M.F.M., Glass, M.R., Rossiello, G., Gliozzo, A., Mihindukulasooriya, N.: KGI: an integrated framework for knowledge intensive language tasks. CoRR abs/2204.03985 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dimou, A., Vander Sande, M., Colpaert, P., Verborgh, R., Mannens, E., Van de Walle, R.: RML: a generic language for integrated RDF mappings of heterogeneous data. In: LDOW (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dong, X., et al.: Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion. In: KDD, pp. 601–610. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Gemmis, M., Lops, P., Musto, C., Narducci, F., Semeraro, G.: Semantics-Aware content-based recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 119–159. Springer, Boston, MA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Glass, M.R., Rossiello, G., Chowdhury, M.F.M., Gliozzo, A.: Robust retrieval augmented generation for zero-shot slot filling. In: EMNLP (1), pp. 1939–1949. Association for Computational Linguistics (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heidari, G., Ramadan, A., Stocker, M., Auer, S.: Demonstration of faceted search on scholarly knowledge graphs. In: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, pp. 685–686 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hogan, A., et al.: Knowledge graphs. Synth. Lect. Data Semant. Knowl. 12(2), 1–257 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaradeh, M.Y., et al.: Open research knowledge graph: next generation infrastructure for semantic scholarly knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 243–246 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jaradeh, M.Y., Stocker, M., Auer, S.: Question answering on scholarly knowledge graphs. In: Hall, M., Merčun, T., Risse, T., Duchateau, F. (eds.) TPDL 2020. LNCS, vol. 12246, pp. 19–32. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54956-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., Philip, S.Y.: A survey on knowledge graphs: representation, acquisition, and applications. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 33(2), 494–514 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Josifoski, M., Cao, N.D., Peyrard, M., West, R.: Genie: generative information extraction. CoRR abs/2112.08340 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khan, J.A., Rehman, I.U., Khan, Y.H., Khan, I.J., Rashid, S.: Comparison of requirement prioritization techniques to find best prioritization technique. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. 7(11), 53–59 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, Y., Ju, Y., Hong, S., Jeong, S.R.: Practical text mining for trend analysis: ontology to visualization in aerospace technology. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. (TIIS) 11(8), 4133–4145 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Koren, Y., Bell, R.: Advances in collaborative filtering. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 77–118. Springer, Boston (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewis, M., et al.: BART: denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. In: ACL, pp. 7871–7880. Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, J., Duan, L.: A survey on knowledge graph-based recommender systems. In: 2021 IEEE 5th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), vol. 5, pp. 2450–2453. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Manghi, P., Houssos, N., Mikulicic, M., Jörg, B.: The data model of the OpenAIRE scientific communication e-Infrastructure. In: Dodero, J.M., Palomo-Duarte, M., Karampiperis, P. (eds.) MTSR 2012. CCIS, vol. 343, pp. 168–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35233-1_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Manrique, R., Marino, O.: Knowledge graph-based weighting strategies for a scholarly paper recommendation scenario. In: KaRS@ RecSys, pp. 5–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nayyeri, M., Vahdati, S., Zhou, X., Shariat Yazdi, H., Lehmann, J.: Embedding-based recommendations on scholarly knowledge graphs. In: Harth, A., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2020. LNCS, vol. 12123, pp. 255–270. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Niu, F., Zhang, C., Ré, C., Shavlik, J.W.: DeepDive: web-scale knowledge-base construction using statistical learning and inference. In: VLDS. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 884, pp. 25–28. CEUR-WS.org (2012)

  29. Noy, N., Gao, Y., Jain, A., Narayanan, A., Patterson, A., Taylor, J.: Industry-scale knowledge graphs: lessons and challenges. Commun. ACM 62(8), 36–43 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Oelen, A., Jaradeh, M.Y., Stocker, M., Auer, S.: Generate fair literature surveys with scholarly knowledge graphs. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, pp. 97–106 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rezayi, S., Zhao, H., Kim, S., Rossi, R., Lipka, N., Li, S.: Edge: enriching knowledge graph embeddings with external text. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL), pp. 2767–2776 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rossiello, G., et al.: Generative relation linking for question answering over knowledge bases. In: Hotho, A., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2021. LNCS, vol. 12922, pp. 321–337. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88361-4_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Ryen, V., Soylu, A., Roman, D.: Building semantic knowledge graphs from (semi-) structured data: a review. Future Internet 14(5), 129 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. de Sá Mesquita, F., Cannaviccio, M., Schmidek, J., Mirza, P., Barbosa, D.: KnowledgeNet: a benchmark dataset for knowledge base population. In: EMNLP/IJCNLP (1), pp. 749–758. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sahoo, S.S., et al.: A survey of current approaches for mapping of relational databases to RDF. W3C RDB2RDF Incubator Group Rep. 1, 113–130 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Salatino, A.A., Mannocci, A., Osborne, F.: Detection, analysis, and prediction of research topics with scientific knowledge graphs. In: Predicting the Dynamics of Research Impact, pp. 225–252. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86668-6_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Savage, N.: The race to the top among the world’s leaders in artificial intelligence. Nature 588(7837), S102–S102 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vrandečić, D., Krötzsch, M.: WikiData: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57(10), 78–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, K., Shen, Z., Huang, C., Wu, C.H., Dong, Y., Kanakia, A.: Microsoft academic graph: when experts are not enough. Quant. Sci. Stud. 1(1), 396–413 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weber, L., Böhme, T., Irmer, M.: Ontology-based content analysis of US patent applications from 2001–2010. Pharm. Patent Analyst 2(1), 39–54 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wohlgenannt, G., Belk, S., Karacsonyi, M., Schett, M.: Using an ontology learning system for trend analysis and detection. In: International Semantic Web Conference (Posters & Demos), pp. 37–40. Citeseer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nandana Mihindukulasooriya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mihindukulasooriya, N. et al. (2022). Knowledge Graph Induction Enabling Recommending and Trend Analysis: A Corporate Research Community Use Case. In: Sattler, U., et al. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2022. ISWC 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13489. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19433-7_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19433-7_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19432-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19433-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics