Skip to main content

Leaving No-One Behind? A Research Agenda for Queer Issues in ICT4D

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Freedom and Social Inclusion in a Connected World (ICT4D 2022)

Abstract

The ICT4D community, and the IFIP Working Group 9.4, is bound by a shared interest in social emancipation through digital technologies. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) are often evoked to highlight the many social, economic, and environmental arenas where we are active. However, a perspective centring on queer issues is notably absent from our various mission statements. In this paper, I present a research agenda for queer issues in ICT4D to address this absence. I examine the literature that presents such a perspective in information systems and ICT4D, exploring the challenges that the invisibility of queer issues leads to. For LGBTQ+ people, this absence causes barriers and hesitancy in engaging with public services, and worse, the perpetuation and amplification of systematic discrimination. As researchers, developers, and practitioners, we can and should adopt a more inclusive approach, building on past experiences with ICT to address the plights of marginalized groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yaghoubi-Notash, M., Mohammad, V.N., Soufiani, M.: Language, gender and subjectivity from Judith Butler’s perspective. Philos. Investig. 13, 305–316 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crenshaw, K.W.: On Intersectionality: Essential Writings. The New Press, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mayer, K.H., Bradford, J.B., Makadon, H.J., Stall, R., Goldhammer, H., Landers, S.: Sexual and gender minority health: what we know and what needs to be done. Am. J. Public Health 98, 989–995 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.127811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crenshaw, K.: Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev. 43, 61 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Raftree, L., Kumar, M.: An Understanding of LGBTQI Rights and Technology for Development. Technology Salon Discussion at the Intersection of Technology Development (2015). https://technologysalon.org/an-understanding-of-lgbtqi-rights-and-technology-for-development/. Accessed 10 Apr 2022

  6. Kumar, M.: Digital Security of LGBTQI Aid Workers: Awareness and Response. The European Interagency Security Forum, EISF 2020, 13 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haimson, O.L., Gorrell, D., Starks, D.L., Weinger, Z.: Designing trans technology: defining challenges and envisioning community-centered solutions. In: Proceedings of 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13. ACM, Honolulu (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376669

  8. Johnson, J.A.: Information systems and the translation of transgender. TSQ Transgender Stud. Q. 2, 160–165 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2848940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. van Zyl, I., McLean, N.: The Ethical Implications of Digital Contact Tracing for LGBTQIA+ Communities. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Browne, K., Nash, C.J., (eds.) Queer methods and methodologies: intersecting queer theories and social science research. Ashgate, Farnham (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thiel, M.: Queering scholarship? LGBT politics as an analytical challenge for political science and international relations. In: Bosia, M.J., McEvoy, S.M., Rahman, M. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Global LGBT and Sexual Diversity Politics, pp. 119–135. Oxford University Press (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190673741.013.5

  12. Mills, E.: ‘Leave No One Behind’: Gender, Sexuality and the Sustainable Development Goals (2015). https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7975_HRD-0148-2015071

  13. Galang: How Filipino LBTs Cope with Economic Disadvantage. IDS, Brighton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Müller, A.: Teaching lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender health in a South African health sciences faculty: addressing the gap. BMC Med. Educ. 13, 174 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matthyse, L.: Achieving gender equality by 2030: transgender equality in relation to sustainable development goal 5. Agenda 34, 124–132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2020.1744336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vandeskog, H.O., Heggen, K.M., Engebretsen, E.: Gendered vulnerabilities and the blind spots of the 2030 Agenda’s ‘leave no one behind’ pledge. Crit. Policy Stud. 1–17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.2014342

  17. Swank, E., Fahs, B., Frost, D.M.: Region, social identities, and disclosure practices as predictors of heterosexist discrimination against sexual minorities in the United States. Sociol. Inq. 83, 238–258 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Botti, F., D’Ippoliti, C.: Don’t ask don’t tell (that you’re poor). Sexual orientation and social exclusion in Italy. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 49, 8–25 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2014.02.002

  19. Avgerou, C.: Theoretical framing of ICT4D research. In: Choudrie, J., Islam, M., Wahid, F., Bass, J., Priyatma, J. (eds.) Information and Communication Technologies for Development, vol. 504, pp. 10–23. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Walsham, G.: ICT4D research: reflections on history and future agenda. Inf. Technol. Dev. 23, 18–41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heeks, R.: Future priorities for development informatics research from the post-2015 development agenda. SSRN Electron. J. (2014). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438434

  22. Dey, B., Sorour, K., Filieri, R., (eds.): ICTs in Developing Countries. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137469502

  23. Vannini, S., Masiero, S., Tandon, A., Wellington, C., Wyers, K., Braa, K.: Feminist and queer approaches to ICT4D. Inf. Technol. Dev. (2021). Special Issue Call for Papers

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gallop: LGBT Identification Rises to 5.6% in Latest US Estimate. Gallop Poll (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reed, R.: Dignity in transgender lives: a capabilities approach. J. Hum. Dev. Capab. 21, 36–48 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1661982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bradford, J., Reisner, S.L., Honnold, J.A., Xavier, J.: Experiences of transgender-related discrimination and implications for health: results from the Virginia transgender health initiative study. Am. J. Public Health 103, 1820–1829 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Costa, A.B., et al.: Healthcare needs of and access barriers for brazilian transgender and gender diverse people. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 20(1), 115–123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-016-0527-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gordon, D., Pratama, M.P.: Mapping discrimination experienced by Indonesian trans* FtM persons. J. Homosex 64, 1283–1303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1244446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peltier, E.: Cameroon Sentences Transgender Women to 5 Years in Prison. N Y Times (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rani, N., Samuel, A.A.: Reducing transphobia: comparing the efficacy of direct and indirect contact. Ind. Commer. Train 51, 445–460 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-12-2018-0102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mcneil, J., Bailey, L., Ellis, S., Regan, M.: Speaking from the margins: trans mental health and well-being in Ireland (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Murib, Z.: Administering biology: how “bathroom bills” criminalize and stigmatize trans and gender nonconforming people in public space. Adm. Theory Prax 42, 153–171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1659048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Faye, S.: The Transgender Issue: An Argument for Justice. Allen Lane, London (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor, L.: What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data Soc. 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335

  35. Mayer-Schönberger, V., Cukier, K.: Big data : a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L.: Sorting things out : classification and its consequences (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Milan, S., Treré, E., Masiero, S.: Introduction: COVID-19 seen from the land of otherwise. Covid-19 Margins Pandemic Invisibilities Policies Resist. Datafied Society, pp. 14–23. Institue of Network Cultures, Amsterdam, NL (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kirkland, A.: Dropdown rights: categorizing transgender discrimination in healthcare technologies. Soc. Sci. Med. 289, 114348 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Saraswathi, A., Praveen, P.A.: To analyse the problems of transgender in India/study using new triangular combined block fuzzy cognitive maps. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 6, 186–195 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Costelloe, S.J., Hepburn, S.: Management of transgender patients in laboratory information management systems – moving on from binary and ternary logic. Ann. Clin. Biochem. Int. J. Lab. Med. 58, 264–266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563220984825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dhillon, N., Oliffe, J.L., Kelly, M.T., Krist, J.: Bridging barriers to cervical cancer screening in transgender men: a scoping review. Am. J. Men’s Health 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988320925691

  42. Roznovjak, D., Petroll, A., Cortina, C.S.: Breast cancer risk and screening in transgender individuals. Curr. Breast Cancer Rep. 13(1), 56–61 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-020-00403-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. D’Ignazio, C., Klein, L.F.: Data Feminism. MIT Press, Cambridge (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Pandya, A.K., Redcay, A.: Access to health services: barriers faced by the transgender population in India. J. Gay Lesbian Ment. Health 25, 132–54 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2020.1850592

  45. Oosterhoff, P., Hoang, T.-A., Trang, Q.: Negotiating Public and Legal Spaces: The Emergence of an LGBT Movement in Vietnam (2014). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3463.9129

  46. Heeks, R., Renken, J.: Data justice for development: what would it mean? Inf. Dev. 34, 90–102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916678282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Scheuerman, M.K., Paul, J.M., Brubaker, J.R.: How computers see gender: an evaluation of gender classification in commercial facial analysis services. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, 1–33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Taylor, L., Sharma, G., Martin, A., Jameson, S.: What does the COVID-19 Response Mean for Global Data Justice? Data Justice COVID-19 Global Perspectives. Meatspace Press, Manchester (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Weitzberg, K., Cheesman, M., Martin, A., Schoemaker, E.: Between surveillance and recognition: rethinking digital identity in aid. Big Data Soc. 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211006744

  50. Reisner, S.L., Poteat, T., Keatley, J., Cabral, M., Mothopeng, T., Dunham, E., et al.: Global health burden and needs of transgender populations: a review. The Lancet 388, 412–436 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00684-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dunne, M.J., Raynor, L.A., Cottrell, E.K., Pinnock, W.J.A.: Interviews with patients and providers on transgender and gender nonconforming health data collection in the electronic health record. Transgender Health 2, 1–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2016.0041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Floegel, D., Wagner, T.L., Delmonaco, D., Watson, B.M.: Expanding our conceptions of embodied and affective information interactions with queer theory. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58, 582–586 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wagner, T.L., Kitzie, V.L., Lookingbill, V.: Transgender and nonbinary individuals and ICT-driven information practices in response to transexclusionary healthcare systems: a qualitative study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab234

  54. Brulé, E., Spiel, K.: Negotiating gender and disability identities in participatory design. In: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Communities and Technologies - Transforming Communities, New York, NY, USA, pp. 218–227. Association for Computing Machinery (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328369

  55. Hicks, M.: Hacking the Cis-tem. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 41, 20–33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2019.2897667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Noble, S.U.: Algorithms of oppression : how search engines reinforce racism (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Spiel, K., Keyes, O., Barlas, P.: Patching gender: non-binary utopias in HCI. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors Computer System, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, pp. 1–11. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3310425

  58. DeVito, M.A., Walker, A.M., Lustig, C., Ko, A.J., Spiel, K., Ahmed, A.A., et al.: Queer in HCI: supporting LGBTQIA+ researchers and research across domains. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference Human Factors Computer System, Honolulu, HI, USA, pp. 1–4. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381058

  59. Costanza-Chock, S.: Design Justice : Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  60. Erete, S., Israni, A., Dillahunt, T.: An intersectional approach to designing in the margins. Interactions 25, 66–69 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3194349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rohm, R., Martins, J.: The LGBTQ+ community during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil. COVID-19 Margins Pandemic Invisibilities Policies Resist. Datafied Society, pp. 65–69. Institue of Network Cultures, Amsterdam, NL (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Castleberry, J.: Addressing the gender continuum: a concept analysis. J. Transcult. Nurs. 30, 403–409 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659618818722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Butler, J.: Gender Trouble. Routledge, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lord, C.: Medium: ink on paper. GLQ J. Lesbian Gay Stud. 17, 639–647 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-1302442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Martin, L.M.: Everyday Information Architecture, 1st edn. A Book Apart, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Connell, R.: Southern Theory. Polity Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Scheim, A.I., Appenroth, M.N., Beckham, S.W., Goldstein, Z., Grinspan, M.C., Keatley, J.G., et al.: Transgender HIV research: nothing about us without us. Lancet HIV 6, e566–e567 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30269-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Nussbaum, M.: Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  69. Pitts-Taylor, V.: A slow and unrewarding and miserable pause in your life”: waiting in medicalized gender transition. Health Interdiscip. J. Soc. Study Health Illn. Med. 24, 646–664 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459319831330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hofstätter, B., Thaler, A., Jauk, D., En, B., Klaura, I.M.: Irritating, Intervening, Interacting: Doing Queer Science and Technology Studies, vol. 1, p. 35 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I would like to show my gratitude to Dr. Johan Ivar Sæbø, Assistant Professor at the Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, for his support and encouragement, and for his contributions to the structure of this paper. I would also like to thank Dr. Silvia Masiero, Assistant Professor at the Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, for her guidance through the literature on data justice, for her comments, and for the encouragement she gave me throughout the preparation of this research agenda.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Wyers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wyers, K. (2022). Leaving No-One Behind? A Research Agenda for Queer Issues in ICT4D. In: Zheng, Y., Abbott, P., Robles-Flores, J.A. (eds) Freedom and Social Inclusion in a Connected World. ICT4D 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 657. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19429-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19429-0_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19428-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19429-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics