Skip to main content

Challenging Historical Populism—Children First, Offenders Second: From Concept to Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Child First
  • 325 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the genesis, development and implementation of a Children First, Offender Second approach to engaging with children who come into conflict with the law, with a particular focus on Wales—the birthplace of Children First. The chapter starts back in the 1990s and the regressive, repressive and anti-child movement that sprang from the Labour Government of the time and the office of the then Home Secretary, Jack Straw. We show how Children First, Offenders Second (CFOS) was both a reaction to the offence and offender focus of Labour policies towards the treatment of children and, at the same time, an attempt to chart a positive and progressive way forward for those charged with working with children in conflict with the law and the children themselves. We then explore how, over time, the evidence base for CFOS was constructed. In doing this, we pay particular attention to the links between academia and those in policy development and implementation roles. We link developments in Wales to those that have taken place in England—at the level of local Youth Offending Teams (YOTs) and the Youth Justice Board for England and Wales (YJB)—including such milestones as Tory Ministers referring no longer to young offenders but children, concluding with the adoption of CFOS (or Child First) as the main driver of official policy of the Youth Justice Board for England and Wales. The chapter begins with an account of the development of CFOS from an academic/research perspective (written by Haines), moves on to explore how CFOS influenced the development of youth justice policy (written by Thomas) and concludes with Haines leading the discussion about the future for Child First.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Practices which draw more children in the youth justice system than is warranted, rather than diverting them out of it.

  2. 2.

    Practices which increase the tariff or disposal to a more punitive outcome.

  3. 3.

    This also had multi-agency membership (some of which crossed over with the formation of the AWYOS).

  4. 4.

    This has changed over the years with the equivalent now being contained in the Children and Communities Grant.

  5. 5.

    Launch of the Welsh Centre for Crime and Social Justice | WISERD. https://wiserd.ac.uk/news/launch-welsh-centre-crime-and-social-justice.

References

  • ARCS UK Ltd. (2013). Evaluation of services provided by Nacro Cymru to the Welsh Government. Welsh Assembly Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission. (1996). Misspent youth. Audit Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T. (2010). The systematic determinants of levels of child incarceration in England and Wales. A thesis submitted to the University of Bedfordshire for the degree of Professional Doctorate in Youth Justice Luton, University of Bedfordshire. https://uobrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10547/134949/thesis%20timb%201.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y

  • Case, S. (2018). Youth justice: A critical introduction. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Case, S., & Browning, A. (2021). Child first justice: The research evidence-base. Loughborough University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, S., & Haines, K. (2009). Understanding youth offending: Risk factor research, policy and practice. Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, S., & Haines, K. (2020). Abolishing Youth Justice Systems: Children first, offenders nowhere. Youth Justice, 21(Special Issue), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldson, B. (2010). The sleep of (criminological) reason: Knowledge—Policy rupture and New Labour’s youth justice legacy. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 10(1), 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. (2009). The political economy of risk and the new governance of youth crime. Punishment and Society, 11, 443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K. (1998). Some principled objections to a restorative justice approach to working with juvenile offenders. In L. Walgrave (Ed.), Restorative justice for juveniles: Potentialities, risks, and problems for research. Society, Crime, and Criminal Justice. Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K. (2000). Referral orders and youth offender panels: Restorative approaches and the new youth justice. In B. Goldson (Ed.), The new youth justice. Russell House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K. (2009). The dragonisation of youth justice. In W. Taylor, R. Earle, & R. Hester (Eds.), Youth justice handbook: Theory, policy and practice. Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., & Case, S. (2004). Promoting prevention: A multi-agency initiative to prevent youth offending through consultation in Swansea schools. Youth Justice, 4(2), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., & Case, S. (2012). Is the scaled approach a failed approach? Youth Justice, 12(3), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., & Case, S. (2015). Positive youth justice: Children first, offenders second. Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., Case, S., Davies, K., & Charles, A. (2013). The Swansea Bureau: A model of diversion from the Youth Justice System. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 41(2), 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., Case, S., Isles, E., Rees, I., & Hancock, A. (2004). Extending entitlement: Making it real. Welsh Assembly Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., & Drakeford, M. (1998). Young people and youth justice. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation. (2020). Annual report: Inspection of youth offending services (2019–2020). Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S., Crawford, A., & Traynor, P. (2016). Nipping crime in the bud? The use of antisocial behaviour interventions with young people in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 57, 1230–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Local Government Association. (2008, May). Lifting the burdens taskforce review of the Home Office and Youth Justice final report—Recommendations. Local Government Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2010). Youth crime and justice: Key messages from the Edinburgh Study of Youth Transitions and Crime. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 10(2), 179–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2010). Breaking the cycle: Effective punishment, rehabilitation and sentencing of offenders. Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2016). The government response to Charlie Taylor’s Review of the Youth Justice System. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, J. (2001). Korrectional karaoke: New labour and the zombification of youth justice. Youth Justice, 1(2), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souhami, A. (2011). Inside the Youth Justice Board: Ambiguity and influence in New Labour’s youth justice. Safer Communities, 10(3), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2016). Review of the Youth Justice System in England and Wales. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (2015). Children first, offenders second: An aspiration or reality for youth justice in Wales. Thesis submitted for Professional Doctorate in Leadership in Children and Young People’s Services, University of Bedfordshire, Luton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh Assembly Government. (2004). Children and young people: Rights to action. Welsh Assembly Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh Assembly Government & YJB. (2004). The All Wales Youth Offending Strategy. Welsh Assembly Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh Government. (2012, September). Proposals to improve services in Wales to better meet the needs of children and young people who are at risk of entering, or are already in the Youth Justice System. Welsh Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh Government. (2014). Prevention of offending by young people. Welsh Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh Government & Ministry of Justice. (2019). Youth Justice Blueprint for Wales. https://gov.wales/sites/default/files/publications/2019-05/youth-justice-blueprint_0.pdf

  • Welsh Government & YJB. (2014). Children and young people first. Welsh Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2007, June). Incorporating children’s rights: The divergence in law and policy. Legal Studies, 27(2), 261–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • YJB. (2014). AssetPlus model document. YJB.

    Google Scholar 

  • YJB. (2021). Strategic plan 2021–2024. YJB.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Haines .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haines, K., Thomas, S. (2023). Challenging Historical Populism—Children First, Offenders Second: From Concept to Policy. In: Case, S., Hazel, N. (eds) Child First. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19272-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19272-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19271-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19272-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics