Skip to main content

Skewing Chaos: Partisan Benefits Without Legislative Stability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Skewing Chaos

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Electoral Politics ((SSEP))

  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

Having created the theory of fractious parties, this chapter empirically analyzes whether political parties are able to concentrate power in their members despite the chaotic nature of Paraguay’s legislature. I analyze two dependent variables: roll-rates and win-rates. Roll-rates capture the negative power of legislators, and win-rates capture positive and negative powers of legislators. I then attempt to understand these outcomes using: (1) unidimensional, non-partisan models; (2) unidimensional, partisan models; (3) multidimensional, non-partisan models; and (4) multidimensional, partisan models. The empirical analyses of this chapter show that both unidimensional and multidimensional models suggest that political parties matter in Paraguay. However, unidimensional models miss the dynamics of intra-party competition. By analyzing the dynamics of inter- and intra-party competition using multidimensional models, this chapter finds that although short-term intra-party conflicts can in fact debilitate a majority party’s ability to concentrate benefits in its members in the short term, in the long term political parties have been capable of concentrating benefits in their members. In short, despite short-term instability, parties can still benefit their members by Skewing Chaos in their favor in the long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more information on how to estimate the uncovered sets, please refer to Bianco et al. (2004), and/or view the source code and documentation of the R function I developed to be able to estimate uncovered sets and yolks easily, which can be found here: https://github.com/acarrizosa/uset.

  2. 2.

    Recall from Chap. 3 that UNACE was an intra-party faction of the Colorado party that later became an independent, splinter party, only to return to the Colorado party again in 2012. Therefore, it is often useful to treat these two parties as a single party.

  3. 3.

    This same model for win-rates rather than roll-rates is contained in 13.9 of the Appendix to this chapter. Results are substantively the same.

  4. 4.

    The results of these models for win-rates rather than roll-rates can be seen in Table 13.5 of Sect. 13.9 of the Appendix to this chapter. Results are substantively the same.

References

  • APSR. (1950). Summary of conclusions and proposals. The American Political Science Review, 44(3), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, W., Jelizakov, I., & Sened, I. (2004). The uncovered set and the limits of legislative action. Political Analysis, 12, 256–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (2005). Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, K. (1993). Where’s the party? British Journal of Political Science, 23, 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, K. (1998). Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. S. (2007). Party Influence in Congress. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Carrizosa .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carrizosa, A. (2023). Skewing Chaos: Partisan Benefits Without Legislative Stability. In: Skewing Chaos. Springer Series in Electoral Politics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18625-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics