Abstract
Photo-based research, including but not limited to photovoice, photo-elicitation, and photo-narrative, can be a powerful tool for collecting and presenting data. Our aim in this chapter is to highlight the value of this type of research using examples from our previous photo-based research. Although there are numerous benefits of photo-based research, here we highlight the value of seeing—both physically and metaphorically—the experiences of others in new lights (i.e., breaking frames). We discuss how the breaking of frames for researchers, participants, and audiences can produce more impactful research. Importantly, the breaking of frames not only improves the quality and depth of research but can also have lasting impacts on the lives both of those being studied and of the audiences who view it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bach, H. (2012). Composing a visual narrative inquiry. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 280–307). SAGE Publications.
Barthes, R. (1978). Image-music-text. Hill & Wang.
Becker, H. (2007). Telling about society. University of Chicago Press.
Bennett, B., Maar, M., Moeke-Pickering, T., Trudeau-Peltier, D., & Trudeau, S. (2019). The Gaataa’aabing visual research method: A culturally safe Anishinaabek transformation of photovoice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–12.
Birch, M., & Miller, T. (2000). Inviting intimacy: The interview as therapeutic opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(3), 189–202.
Bourgois, P., & Schonberg, J. (2009). Righteous Dopefiend. University of California Press.
Brown, M. (2014). Visual criminology and carceral studies: Counter-images in the carceral age. Theoretical Criminology, 18(2), 176–197.
Burgess-Proctor, A. (2015). Methodological and ethical issues in feminist research with abused women: Reflections on participants’ vulnerability and empowerment. Women’s Studies International Forum, 48, 124–134.
Campbell, R., Adams, A. E., Wasco, S. M., Ahrens, C. E., & Sefl, T. (2010). What has it been like for you to talk with me today?: The impact of participating in interview research on rape survivors. Violence against women, 16(1), 60–83.
Castleden, H., Garvin, T., & Huu-ay-aht First Nation. (2008). Modifying photovoice for community-based participatory Indigenous research. Social Science & Medicine, 66(6), 1393–1405.
Clark, J. J., & Walker, R. (2011). Research ethics in victimization studies: Widening the lens. Violence Against Women, 17(12), 1489–1508.
Clark-Ibáñez, M. (2004). Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1507–1527.
Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. UNM Press.
Copes, H., & Lunsford, D. (2018). Shadow people: A counter visual of those who use methamphetamine. Deviant Behavior, 6, 694–701.
Copes, H., & Ragland, J. (2016). Considering the implicit meanings in photographs in narrative criminology. Crime Media Culture, 12, 271.
Copes, H., Tchoula, W., Brookman, F., & Ragland, J. (2018a). Photo-elicitation interviews with vulnerable populations: Practical and ethical considerations. Deviant Behavior, 9, 475–494.
Copes, H., Tchoula, W., Kim, J., & Ragland, J. (2018b). Symbolic perceptions of methamphetamine: Differentiating between ice and shake. International Journal of Drug Policy, 51, 87–94.
Copes, H., Tchoula, W., & Ragland, J. (2019). Ethically representing drug use: Photographs and ethnographic research with people who use methamphetamine. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice and Criminology, 8(1), 21–36.
Copes, H., Ragland, J., & Forrester, A. (2021). Caught in between: A video essay of masculine identity and meth use in the rural south. Journal of Qualitative Criminology and Criminal Justice, 10(1) https://www.qualitativecriminology.com/pub/v10i1p1/release/1
Copes, H., Brookman, F., Ragland, J., & Beaton, B. (2022). Sex, drugs, and coercive control: Gendered narratives of methamphetamine use, relationships, and violence. Criminology, 60(1), 187–218.
Frohmann, L. (2005). The framing safety project: Photographs and narratives by battered women. Violence Against Women, 11(11), 1396–1419.
Griffin, M. G., Resick, P. A., Waldrop, A. E., & Mechanic, M. B. (2003). Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 221–227.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
Hayward, K., & Presdee, T. L. M. (Eds.). (2010). Framing crime: Cultural criminology and the image. Taylor & Francis Group.
Johnson, L. E., & Benight, C. C. (2003). Effects of trauma‐focused research on recent domestic violence survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 16(6), 567–571.
Jones, P. J., & Wardle, C. (2010). Hindley’s ghost: The visual construction of Maxine Carr. In K. Hayward & T. L. M. Presdee (Eds.), Framing crime: Cultural criminology and the image (pp. 53–68). Taylor & Francis Group.
Lemelin, R. H., Wiersma, E. C., Trapper, L., Kapashesit, R., Beaulieu, M. S., & Dowsley, M. (2013). A dialogue and reflection on photohistory: Engaging indigenous communities in research through visual analysis. Action Research, 11(1), 92–107.
Linnemann, T., & Wall, T. (2013). ‘This is your face on meth’: The punitive spectacle of ‘white trash’ in the rural war on drugs. Theoretical Criminology, 17(3), 315–334.
Moore, D., & Singh, R. (2018). Seeing crime, feeling crime: Visual evidence, emotions, and the prosecution of domestic violence. Theoretical Criminology, 22(1), 116–132.
Nabigon, H., Hagey, R., Webster, S., & MacKay, R. (1999). The learning circle as a research method: The trickster and windigo in research.
Rolbiecki, A., Anderson, K., Teti, M., & Albright, D. L. (2016). Waiting for the cold to end: Using photovoice as a narrative intervention for survivors of sexual assault. Traumatology, 22(4), 1–7.
Samuels, J. (2004). Breaking the ethnographer’s frames: Reflections on the use of photo elicitation in understanding Sri Lankan monastic culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12), 1528–1550.
Sentilles, S. (2017). How we should respond to photographs of suffering. August 3, 2017. The New Yorker.
Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–428.
Wahab, S. (2003). Creating knowledge collaboratively with female sex workers: Insights from a qualitative, feminist, and participatory study. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(4), 625–642.
Wilkins, C. (2017). Foreign domestic: Identification and differentiation as pedagogical strategy in Good Bad People. Focal Plane, 1(1), 22–27.
Worley, R. M., Worley, V. B., & Wood, B. A. (2016). ‘There were ethical dilemmas all day long!’: Harrowing tales of ethnographic researchers in criminology and criminal justice. Criminal Justice Studies, 29(4), 289–308.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Copes, H., Davis, A. (2023). Photo-Based Research with Vulnerable Groups: Breaking Frames for Researchers, Participants, and Audiences. In: Faria, R., Dodge, M. (eds) Qualitative Research in Criminology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18401-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18401-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18400-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18401-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)