Skip to main content

Speculative Multipliers on DeFi: Quantifying On-Chain Leverage Risks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13411))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Blockchains and DeFi have consistently shown to attract financial speculators. One avenue to increase the potential upside (and risks) of financial speculation is leverage trading, in which a trader borrows assets to participate in the financial market. While well-known over-collateralized loans, such as MakerDAO, only enable leverage multipliers of \(1.67\times \), new under-collateralized lending platforms, such as Alpha Homora (AH), unlock leverage multipliers of up to \(8\times \) and attracted over 1.2B \( \texttt {USD}\) of locked value at the time of writing.

In this paper, we are the first to formalize a model for under-collateralized DeFi lending platforms. We analytically exposit and empirically evaluate the three main risks of a leverage-engaging borrower: (i) impermanent loss (IL) inherent to Automated Market Makers (AMMs), (ii) arbitrage loss in AMMs, and (iii) collateral liquidation. Based on our analytical and empirical results of AH over a timeframe of 9 months, we find that a borrower may mitigate the IL through a high leverage multiplier (e.g., more than \(4\times \)) and a margin trading before supplying borrowed assets into AMMs. We interestingly find that the arbitrage and liquidation losses are proportional to the leverage multiplier. In addition, we find that 72.35% of the leverage taking borrowers suffer from a negative APY, when ignoring the governance token incentivization in AH. Finally, when assuming a maximum \(\pm 10\)% move among two stablecoins, we pave the way for more extreme on-chain leverage multipliers of up to \(91.9\times \) by providing appropriate system settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For instance, \(1.67\times \), in the case of MakerDAO, where the collateral value shall not decline below 150% of the debt value.

  2. 2.

    For example, in Alpha Homora V2, if a liquidator repays all debt of a position, the liquidator will receive \(5\%\) of debts as rewards, i.e., \( \texttt {LS} = 5\%\).

References

  1. Alpha homora (2021). https://alphafinancelab.gitbook.io/alpha-finance-lab/alpha-products/alpha-homora

  2. Alpha homora v1 (2021). https://homora.alphafinance.io/

  3. Alpha homora v2 (2021). https://homora-v2.alphafinance.io/

  4. Aave: Aave Protocol (2020). https://github.com/aave/aave-protocol

  5. Adrian, T., Shin, H.S.: Liquidity and leverage. J. Financ. Intermed. 19(3), 418–437 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aigner, A.A., Dhaliwal, G.: Uniswap: impermanent loss and risk profile of a liquidity provider. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.14404 (2021)

  7. BitMEX: Bitmex (2021). https://www.bitmex.com/

  8. Breidenbach, L., et al.: Chainlink 2.0: next steps in the evolution of decentralized oracle networks (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cousaert, S., Xu, J., Matsui, T.: SoK: yield aggregators in DeFi. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC), pp. 1–14. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daian, P., et al.: Flash boys 2.0: frontrunning, transaction reordering, and consensus instability in decentralized exchanges. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Darlin, M., Papadis, N., Tassiulas, L.: Optimal bidding strategy for maker auctions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.07086 (2020)

  12. dYdX: dYdX (2020). https://dydx.exchange/

  13. Eskandari, S., Moosavi, M., Clark, J.: SoK: transparent dishonesty: front-running attacks on blockchain (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alpha Finance: AHV contract addresses (2021). https://immunefi.com/bounty/alphafinance/

  15. Compound Finance: Compound finance (2019). https://compound.finance/

  16. The Maker Foundation: Makerdao (2019). https://makerdao.com/en/

  17. Liu, B., Szalachowski, P., Zhou, J.: A first look into DeFi oracles, pp. 39–48 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moin, A., Sekniqi, K., Sirer, E.G.: SoK: a classification framework for stablecoin designs. In: Bonneau, J., Heninger, N. (eds.) FC 2020. LNCS, vol. 12059, pp. 174–197. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51280-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. OkEX: Okex (2021). https://www.okex.com/

  20. Trading Crypto with Leverage & the Top 6 Providers (2019). https://blog.goodaudience.com/trading-crypto-with-leverage-the-top-6-providers-31d4db6d3e00

  21. Perez, D., Werner, S.M., Xu, J., Livshits, B.: Liquidations: DeFi on a knife-edge. In: Borisov, N., Diaz, C. (eds.) FC 2021. LNCS, vol. 12675, pp. 457–476. Springer, Heidelberg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64331-0_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Poloniex: Poloniex (2021). https://poloniex.com/

  23. Band Protocol: Band protocol (2019). https://bandprotocol.com/

  24. Qin, K., Zhou, L., Afonin, Y., Lazzaretti, L., Gervais, A.: CeFi vs. DeFi-comparing centralized to decentralized finance. In: 2021 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT). IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Qin, K., Zhou, L., Gamito, P., Jovanovic, P., Gervais, A.: An empirical study of DeFi liquidations: incentives, risks, and instabilities. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 336–350. ACM (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Qin, K., Zhou, L., Gervais, A.: Quantifying blockchain extractable value: how dark is the forest? In: 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Qin, K., Zhou, L., Livshits, B., Gervais, A.: Attacking the DeFi ecosystem with flash loans for fun and profit. In: Borisov, N., Diaz, C. (eds.) FC 2021. LNCS, vol. 12674, pp. 3–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64322-8_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Schär, F.: Decentralized finance: on blockchain-and smart contract-based financial markets. Available at SSRN 3571335 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. SushiSwap: SushiSwap (2020). https://sushi.com/

  30. Thurner, S., Farmer, J.D., Geanakoplos, J.: Leverage causes fat tails and clustered volatility. Quant. Finance 12(5), 695–707 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Uniswap: Uniswap (2020). https://uniswap.org/

  32. Wang, Z., Qin, K., Minh, D.V., Gervais, A.: Speculative multipliers on DeFi: quantifying on-chain leverage risks. Financ. Cryptogr. Data Secur. (2022). https://www.ifca.ai/fc22/preproceedings/71.pdf

  33. Prime XBT: Prime XBT (2021). https://primexbt.com/

  34. Zhou, L., Qin, K., Cully, A., Livshits, B., Gervais, A.: On the just-in-time discovery of profit-generating transactions in DeFi protocols. In: 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 919–936 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou, L., Qin, K., Gervais, A.: A2MM: mitigating frontrunning, transaction reordering and consensus instability in decentralized exchanges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07371 (2021)

  36. Zhou, L., Qin, K., Torres, C.F., Le, D.V., Gervais, A.: High-frequency trading on decentralized on-chain exchanges. In: 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 428–445. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers and Stephanie Hurder for providing valuable comments and feedback which helped us to strengthen the paper. We are moreover grateful to Nimiq for partially funding this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhipeng Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 International Financial Cryptography Association

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Z., Qin, K., Minh, D.V., Gervais, A. (2022). Speculative Multipliers on DeFi: Quantifying On-Chain Leverage Risks. In: Eyal, I., Garay, J. (eds) Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13411. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18283-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18283-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18282-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18283-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics