Abstract
Blockchains and DeFi have consistently shown to attract financial speculators. One avenue to increase the potential upside (and risks) of financial speculation is leverage trading, in which a trader borrows assets to participate in the financial market. While well-known over-collateralized loans, such as MakerDAO, only enable leverage multipliers of \(1.67\times \), new under-collateralized lending platforms, such as Alpha Homora (AH), unlock leverage multipliers of up to \(8\times \) and attracted over 1.2B \( \texttt {USD}\) of locked value at the time of writing.
In this paper, we are the first to formalize a model for under-collateralized DeFi lending platforms. We analytically exposit and empirically evaluate the three main risks of a leverage-engaging borrower: (i) impermanent loss (IL) inherent to Automated Market Makers (AMMs), (ii) arbitrage loss in AMMs, and (iii) collateral liquidation. Based on our analytical and empirical results of AH over a timeframe of 9 months, we find that a borrower may mitigate the IL through a high leverage multiplier (e.g., more than \(4\times \)) and a margin trading before supplying borrowed assets into AMMs. We interestingly find that the arbitrage and liquidation losses are proportional to the leverage multiplier. In addition, we find that 72.35% of the leverage taking borrowers suffer from a negative APY, when ignoring the governance token incentivization in AH. Finally, when assuming a maximum \(\pm 10\)% move among two stablecoins, we pave the way for more extreme on-chain leverage multipliers of up to \(91.9\times \) by providing appropriate system settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For instance, \(1.67\times \), in the case of MakerDAO, where the collateral value shall not decline below 150% of the debt value.
- 2.
For example, in Alpha Homora V2, if a liquidator repays all debt of a position, the liquidator will receive \(5\%\) of debts as rewards, i.e., \( \texttt {LS} = 5\%\).
References
Alpha homora (2021). https://alphafinancelab.gitbook.io/alpha-finance-lab/alpha-products/alpha-homora
Alpha homora v1 (2021). https://homora.alphafinance.io/
Alpha homora v2 (2021). https://homora-v2.alphafinance.io/
Aave: Aave Protocol (2020). https://github.com/aave/aave-protocol
Adrian, T., Shin, H.S.: Liquidity and leverage. J. Financ. Intermed. 19(3), 418–437 (2010)
Aigner, A.A., Dhaliwal, G.: Uniswap: impermanent loss and risk profile of a liquidity provider. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.14404 (2021)
BitMEX: Bitmex (2021). https://www.bitmex.com/
Breidenbach, L., et al.: Chainlink 2.0: next steps in the evolution of decentralized oracle networks (2021)
Cousaert, S., Xu, J., Matsui, T.: SoK: yield aggregators in DeFi. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC), pp. 1–14. IEEE (2022)
Daian, P., et al.: Flash boys 2.0: frontrunning, transaction reordering, and consensus instability in decentralized exchanges. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (2020)
Darlin, M., Papadis, N., Tassiulas, L.: Optimal bidding strategy for maker auctions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.07086 (2020)
dYdX: dYdX (2020). https://dydx.exchange/
Eskandari, S., Moosavi, M., Clark, J.: SoK: transparent dishonesty: front-running attacks on blockchain (2019)
Alpha Finance: AHV contract addresses (2021). https://immunefi.com/bounty/alphafinance/
Compound Finance: Compound finance (2019). https://compound.finance/
The Maker Foundation: Makerdao (2019). https://makerdao.com/en/
Liu, B., Szalachowski, P., Zhou, J.: A first look into DeFi oracles, pp. 39–48 (2021)
Moin, A., Sekniqi, K., Sirer, E.G.: SoK: a classification framework for stablecoin designs. In: Bonneau, J., Heninger, N. (eds.) FC 2020. LNCS, vol. 12059, pp. 174–197. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51280-4_11
OkEX: Okex (2021). https://www.okex.com/
Trading Crypto with Leverage & the Top 6 Providers (2019). https://blog.goodaudience.com/trading-crypto-with-leverage-the-top-6-providers-31d4db6d3e00
Perez, D., Werner, S.M., Xu, J., Livshits, B.: Liquidations: DeFi on a knife-edge. In: Borisov, N., Diaz, C. (eds.) FC 2021. LNCS, vol. 12675, pp. 457–476. Springer, Heidelberg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64331-0_24
Poloniex: Poloniex (2021). https://poloniex.com/
Band Protocol: Band protocol (2019). https://bandprotocol.com/
Qin, K., Zhou, L., Afonin, Y., Lazzaretti, L., Gervais, A.: CeFi vs. DeFi-comparing centralized to decentralized finance. In: 2021 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT). IEEE (2021)
Qin, K., Zhou, L., Gamito, P., Jovanovic, P., Gervais, A.: An empirical study of DeFi liquidations: incentives, risks, and instabilities. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 336–350. ACM (2021)
Qin, K., Zhou, L., Gervais, A.: Quantifying blockchain extractable value: how dark is the forest? In: 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE (2022)
Qin, K., Zhou, L., Livshits, B., Gervais, A.: Attacking the DeFi ecosystem with flash loans for fun and profit. In: Borisov, N., Diaz, C. (eds.) FC 2021. LNCS, vol. 12674, pp. 3–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64322-8_1
Schär, F.: Decentralized finance: on blockchain-and smart contract-based financial markets. Available at SSRN 3571335 (2020)
SushiSwap: SushiSwap (2020). https://sushi.com/
Thurner, S., Farmer, J.D., Geanakoplos, J.: Leverage causes fat tails and clustered volatility. Quant. Finance 12(5), 695–707 (2012)
Uniswap: Uniswap (2020). https://uniswap.org/
Wang, Z., Qin, K., Minh, D.V., Gervais, A.: Speculative multipliers on DeFi: quantifying on-chain leverage risks. Financ. Cryptogr. Data Secur. (2022). https://www.ifca.ai/fc22/preproceedings/71.pdf
Prime XBT: Prime XBT (2021). https://primexbt.com/
Zhou, L., Qin, K., Cully, A., Livshits, B., Gervais, A.: On the just-in-time discovery of profit-generating transactions in DeFi protocols. In: 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 919–936 (2021)
Zhou, L., Qin, K., Gervais, A.: A2MM: mitigating frontrunning, transaction reordering and consensus instability in decentralized exchanges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07371 (2021)
Zhou, L., Qin, K., Torres, C.F., Le, D.V., Gervais, A.: High-frequency trading on decentralized on-chain exchanges. In: 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 428–445. IEEE (2021)
Acknowledgments
We thank the anonymous reviewers and Stephanie Hurder for providing valuable comments and feedback which helped us to strengthen the paper. We are moreover grateful to Nimiq for partially funding this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 International Financial Cryptography Association
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, Z., Qin, K., Minh, D.V., Gervais, A. (2022). Speculative Multipliers on DeFi: Quantifying On-Chain Leverage Risks. In: Eyal, I., Garay, J. (eds) Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13411. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18283-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18283-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18282-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18283-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)