Abstract
Environmental accountabilities span the full range of societal commitment to rapid low-carbon transitions or lack thereof. This realist understanding can be applied to ‘just transitions’. Societal commitment to just transitions is underpinned by the degree to which the socio-economic conditions and political entitlements of ordinary people influence the governance of carbon-intensive sectors like energy. The sustainability transitions literature has largely focused on cases of low-carbon transition frontrunners in well-resourced contexts, less on economically constrained transition contexts. This chapter seeks to advance our understanding of environmental accountabilities through two cases of solar energy transitions in the financially constrained contexts of Portugal and Rajasthan—two political jurisdictions where ambitious solar rollouts are shaped both by higher-level authorities (i.e. the European Union and India, respectively) with low-carbon transition imperatives, and by social justice pressures from below. Based on pre-pandemic fieldwork and desk study during 2021–2022, the cases examine how issues such as energy poverty, energy ownership and control over energy infrastructure manifest over multiple scales and within financially constrained contexts characterised by different developmental trajectories. We identify dynamic accountability pressures, mechanisms and relations in these rapidly evolving solar sectors, to highlight the salience of societal commitment and political legitimacy alongside transition policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
On a per-capita basis, an Indian today emits less than a UK citizen in the first quarter of the nineteenth century. Thus, on a cumulative scale at 3% of cumulative global emissions, India’s responsibility relative to colonial and imperial powers (e.g. USA with 25%) is limited.
References
Behrens, P., Rodrigues, J. F., Brás, T., & Silva, C. (2016). Environmental, economic, and social impacts of feed-in tariffs: A Portuguese perspective 2000–2010. Applied Energy, 173, 309–319.
Bevir, M. (2004). Governance and interpretation: What are the implications of postfoundationalism? Public Administration, 82(3), 605–625.
Bevir, M., Rhodes, R., & Weller, P. (2003). Traditions of governance: Interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration, 81(1), 1–17.
Blühdorn, I. (2007). Sustaining the unsustainable: Symbolic politics and the politics of simulation. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 251–275.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework 1. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
Cinco Dias. (2021). EDP instala en Zaragoza el primer ‘barrio solar’. Cinco Dias. https://cincodias.elpais.com/cincodias/2020/06/03/companias/1591185674_755672.html. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Banja, M., Olivier, J. G. J., Vignati, E., Solazzo, E., Grassi, G., Rossi, S., European Commission, & Joint Research Centre. (2021). GHG emissions of all world: 2021 report. https://op.europa.eu/publication/manifestation_identifier/PUB_KJNA30831ENN
Daggett, C. N. (2019). The birth of energy: Fossil fuels, thermodynamics, and the politics of work. Duke University Press.
Damgaard, C. S., McCauley, D., & Reid, L. (2022). Towards energy care ethics: Exploring ethical implications of relationality within energy systems in transition. Energy Research and Social Science, 84, 102356.
Diario de noticias. (2021). Matos Fernandes. Eletricidade a partir de renováveis baixa fatura em 2022 e impulsiona mobilidade mais verde. Diairio de noticias. https://www.dn.pt/dinheiro/matos-fernandes-eletricidade-a-partir-de-renovaveis-baixa-fatura-em-2022-e-impulsiona-mobilidade-mais-verde-14238514.html. Accessed 12 November 2021.
Dorninger, C., Hornborg, A., Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Schaffartzik, A., Giljum, S., Engler, J.-O., Feller, R. L., Hubacek, K., & Wieland, H. (2021). Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. Ecological Economics, 179, 106824.
Dubash, N. K. (2021). Varieties of climate governance: The emergence and functioning of climate institutions. Environmental Politics, 30(sup1), 1–25.
Edificios Energia. (2021). Nova comunidade de energia nasce em miranda do douro. Edificios Energia. https://edificioseenergia.pt/noticias/comunidade-energia-miranda-do-douro-2508/. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Euronews (2021) Early election called in Portugal after MPs reject Socialists’ budget. Euronews . https://www.euronews.com/2021/11/04/portugal-set-for-election-as-president-prepares-to-dissolve-parliament. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Feenstra, M., & Özerol, G. (2021). Energy justice as a search light for gender-energy nexus: Towards a conceptual framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138, 110668.
Fox, J. (2022). Accountability keywords. Accountability Working Paper 11. Accountability Research Center.
Ghosh, R., & Wolf, S. (2021). Hybrid governance and performances of environmental accounting. Journal of Environmental Management, 284, 111995.
Government of Rajasthan. (2019). Rajasthan Solar Energy Policy, 2019 (pp. 1–46). Energy Department.
Gupta, A., & Mason, M., (Eds.). (2014). Transparency in global environmental governance: Critical perspectives. MIT Press.
Hund, K., Porta, D. L., Fabregas, T. P., Laing, T., & Drexhage, J. (2020). The mineral intensity of the clean energy transition (p. 112). https://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/961711588875536384/Minerals-for-Climate-Action-The-Mineral-Intensity-of-the-Clean-Energy-Transition.pdf
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). Portugal. Energy and climate policy. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/portugal-2021. Accessed 11 November 2021.
Isaza, C. (2017). From discourses to policy: Analyzing the creation of an accountability discourse in Colombia. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(11), 942–953.
Jornal de Notícias. (2021, Agosto ). Portugal produz menos energia a partir de fonte solar do que Inglaterra. Jornal de Noticias. https://www.jn.pt/nacional/portugal-produz-menos-energia-a-partir-de-fonte-solar-do-que-inglaterra-14025608.html. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Keyßer, L. T., & Lenzen, M. (2021). 1.5°C degrowth scenarios suggest the need for new mitigation pathways. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2676.
Koppell, J. G. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder.” Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108.
Kraft, B., & Wolf, S. (2018). Through the lens of accountability: Analyzing legitimacy in environmental governance. Organization & Environment, 31(1), 70–92.
Kramarz, T., Park, S., & Johnson, C. (2021). Governing the dark side of renewable energy: A typology of global displacements. Energy Research & Social Science, 74, 101902.
Lovins, A. B. (1976). Energy strategy: The road not taken. Foreign Affairs, 55, 65.
Malm, A. (2016). Fossil capital: The rise of steam-power and the roots of global warming. Verso.
McCarthy, J. (2015). A socioecological fix to capitalist crisis and climate change? The possibilities and limits of renewable energy. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space, 47(12), 2485–2502.
McCauley, D., & Heffron, R. (2018). Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice. Energy Policy, 119, 1–7.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Mininni, G. M. (2022). The Barefoot College ‘eco-village’approach to women’s entrepreneurship in energy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 112–123.
MNRE (Ministry of New and Renewable Energy). (2021). Annual Report 2020–2021 (p. 174). MNRE.
Miranda, J. L., & Delgado, C. J. (2020). Determinants of electric car purchase intention in Portugal. In D. Crowther & S. Seifi (Eds.), Governance and sustainability developments in corporate governance and responsibility, 15 (pp. 161–172). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Mol, A. P. (2006). Environmental governance in the information age: The emergence of informational governance. Environment and Planning c: Government and Policy, 24(4), 497–514.
Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140.
Nordholm, A., & Sareen, S. (2021). Scalar containments of energy justice and its democratic discontents: Solar power and energy poverty alleviation. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3, 626683.
Pardikar, R. (2021, August 16). A dharna here, a court victory there: How Rajasthan villages try to keep their land from solar firms. Down to Earth. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/renewable-energy/a-dharna-here-a-court-victory-there-how-rajasthan-villages-try-to-keep-their-land-from-solar-firms-78479. Accessed 14 February 2022.
Pillai, A. V., & Dubash, N. K. (2021). The limits of opportunism: The uneven emergence of climate institutions in India. Environmental Politics, 30(sup1), 93–117.
Querido, A. R. G. (2020). Assessing energy poverty in Portugal: A new methodology approach. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de Coimbra.
Rao, N. D., Min, J., & Mastrucci, A. (2019). Energy requirements for decent living in India, Brazil and South Africa. Nature Energy, 4(12), 1025–1032.
Sareen, S. (2021). Scalar biases in solar photovoltaic uptake Socio-materiality, regulatory inertia and politics. In A. Kumar, J. Höffken, & A. Pols (Eds.), Dilemmas of energy transitions in the Global South: Balancing urgency and justice (pp. 78–92). Routledge.
Sareen, S. (2020). Metrics for an accountable energy transition? Legitimating the governance of solar uptake. Geoforum, 114, 30–39.
Sareen, S., & Haarstad, H. (2021). Decision-making and scalar biases in solar photovoltaics roll-out. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 51, 24–29.
Sareen, S., & Kale, S. S. (2018). Solar ‘power’: Socio-political dynamics of infrastructural development in two Western Indian states. Energy Research & Social Science, 41, 270–278.
Sareen, S., & Shokrgozar, S. (2022). Desert geographies: Solar energy governance for just transitions. Globalizations, 1–17.
Sareen, S., & Wolf, S. A. (2021). Accountability and sustainability transitions. Ecological Economics, 185, 107056.
Scheidel, A., & Sorman, A. H. (2012). Energy transitions and the global land rush: Ultimate drivers and persistent consequences. Global Environmental Change, 22(3), 588–595.
Shidore, S., & Busby, J. W. (2019). What explains India’s embrace of solar? State-led energy transition in a developmental polity. Energy Policy, 129, 1179–1189.
Silva, B. (2021). Nova lei promete “revolucionar” comunidades de energia em Portugal. EcoSapo. https://eco.sapo.pt/2021/05/29/nova-lei-promete-revolucionar-comunidades-de-energia-em-portugal/. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Stock, R., & Birkenholtz, T. (2021). The sun and the scythe: Energy dispossessions and the agrarian question of labor in solar parks. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(5), 984–1007.
Weerakoon, C., & Kasraie, S. (2019). Doing more with less in a financially restrained market: Motives, processes, and outcomes. In A. McMurray & G. A. de Waal (Eds.), Frugal innovation: A global research companion (pp. 179–195). Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sareen, S., Shokrgozar, S., Neven-Scharnigg, R., Girard, B., Martin, A., Wolf, S.A. (2023). Accountable Solar Energy Transitions in Financially Constrained Contexts. In: Edmondson, B. (eds) Sustainability Transformations, Social Transitions and Environmental Accountabilities. Palgrave Studies in Environmental Transformation, Transition and Accountability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18268-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18268-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18267-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18268-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)