Skip to main content

Structure of a Public Expenditure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Transformation of Georgia from 2004 to 2012
  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses an optimum structure of public expenditure. It provides a cross-country comparison of infrastructure spending and explains how infrastructure projects in Georgia crowded in private investors and multiplied the impact of the budget spending. It explains public–private partnerships—their benefits and risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    IMF staff reports on Armenia provide information on the central government operations. Because total central government expenditure in these staff reports equals total general government expenditure in the IMF’s World Economic Outlook database, I use central government capital expenditure / acquisition of non-financial assets reported in these staff reports to calculate ratios in Figs. 10.1 and 10.2.

  2. 2.

    The vertically integrated urban regeneration schemes in Georgia were first pioneered in cooperation with the World Bank. The World Bank’s work on territorial development received boost from its 2009 World Development Report “Reshaping Economic Geography” (more on this report and on spatial planning in chapter 17 of this book). By 2009, Georgia had progressed in implementing—with own funds and with support of international development partners—many “horizontal” infrastructure improvement measures: secondary and local roads, highways, water and solid waste management projects. This improved conditions for the mentioned “vertical” approach to urban regeneration. The first World Bank regional development project targeted Kakheti region in Georgia’s East and it featured the innovative “vertical” concept which had never been implemented by any international financial institution in Eastern Europe. According to the World Bank (project reports, Regional Development Project, Georgia), this Kakheti project was the first to operationalise the vision put forth by the mentioned 2009 World Development Report. Georgia was invited to the World Bank Headquarters to present its pioneering experience.

  3. 3.

    For details, see Chapter 17 “Territorial Development and Urbanisation.”.

  4. 4.

    IMF estimates of general government revenues and total expenditure start from 1990, hence the look at the period 1990–2018. IMF World Economic Outlook (October 2019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitri Gvindadze .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gvindadze, D. (2023). Structure of a Public Expenditure. In: The Transformation of Georgia from 2004 to 2012. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18264-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18264-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18263-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18264-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics