Skip to main content

China’s Foreign Policy Toward Latin America: Context, Decision, Implementation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China, Latin America, and the Global Economy

Abstract

China’s policy toward Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) has become more comprehensive and assertive since 2014. At the same time, the political situation has become tenser and more uncertain at the regional and global levels. Our primary goal in this article is to understand how these two dynamics intertwine. First, we discuss China’s grand strategy and how Latin America fits in. Second, we examine the institutional setting in which foreign policy is decided. Finally, we combine the contextual analysis with a principal-agent model to analyze implementation costs. In particular, the challenges to implementing the CELAC-China Joint Plan of Action for Cooperation on Priority Areas (2019–2021). When feasible, we considered the interests, capabilities, and attitudes (opinions and values) of Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina. China has already begun to adapt its policies toward LAC. Whether or not the Latin American countries will be able to revitalize regional multilateral institutions remains uncertain. To achieve the agreed collective objectives expressed in the 2018 Santiago Declaration, China and CELAC members, specially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, need to address current challenges with strategic vision and close cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See 专访秦亚青: 十七大后中国外交将更重视多边舞台. Interview with Qin Yaqing, China News Agency, October 12, 2007, available at http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/100804/6370470.html, (accessed 15 September 2018).

  2. 2.

    This matrix is not to be confused with the 3 × 3 Model for Cooperation proposed by Premier Li Keqiang in 2015, referring to capacity building in logistics, power generation, and IT, through synergy between businesses, society, and government. Li’s model has been expanded later to include enhancing funds, credit loans, and insurance financing.

  3. 3.

    The 20th National Party Congress will be held in October 2022. It is not possible to anticipate if Xi Jinping will be confirmed for a third term. See more at: South China Morning Post. 2021. “As the Communist Party turns 100, Xi Jinping has a problem: who will take over?” June 25, 2021. Available at https://encurtador.com.br/ipwT3 [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  4. 4.

    To assume otherwise would wrongly imply that China is becoming a Sultanistic regime. See H. E. Chehabi, J. J. Linz, Sultanistic Regimes (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998).

  5. 5.

    We disagree with Jing Sun, 2016. Growing Diplomacy, Retreating Diplomats—How the Chinese Foreign Ministry has been Marginalized in Foreign Policymaking, Journal of Contemporary China.

  6. 6.

    Following the “1 + 3 + 6” cooperation framework proposed by President Xi in his keynote speech at the China-Latin American and Caribbean Countries Leaders’ Meeting held in Brasilia, 2014. One plan, three engines (trade, investment, and financial cooperation), and six areas (energy, infrastructure, agriculture, manufacturing, Science and Technology, and information technologies).

  7. 7.

    After all, the US is not about to “lose” LAC in any meaningful sense: “The United States remains the region’s largest trading partner, accounting for around a third of the region’s export growth. Countries in the region account for 11 of the United States’ 20 free trade agreements and 8 of its 42 bilateral investment treaties. Militarily, the United States maintains close ties with the region with robust military training programs, regular military training exercises, and high-level visits.” See more in Koleski, Katherine, and Blivas, Alec. 2018. “China's Engagement with Latin America and the Caribbean.” US-China Economic and Security Review Commission: 28.

  8. 8.

    The Common Market of the South (MERCOSUR), the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (OTCA), UNASUR, ALBA, and the Pacific Alliance (formed by Mexico, Colombia, Peru, and Chile) risk becoming “zombie institutions.” Banerjee, R. and Hofmann, B., 2018. The rise of zombie firms: causes and consequences, BIS Quarterly Review.

  9. 9.

    The last CELAC Summit took place in January 2017, in the Dominican Republic. Bolivia would take the pro tempore Presidency in 2019.

  10. 10.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, available at https://bit.ly/38Qlauf (accessed 8 September 2021).

  11. 11.

    Interview conceded to the authors in Beijing, on July 23, 2018.

References

  • Al Jazeera, 2018. China and Argentina sign currency swap deal after G20 summit [online] Available at https://bit.ly/3A82Zw0 [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Alexander, Ernest. 1993. Interorganizational Coordination: Theory and Practice. Journal of Planning Literature 7: 328–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Graham. 2017. Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’ Trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G., and B.J. Silver. 1999. Chaos and Governance in the Modern World-System, 289. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, R. and Creutzfeldt, B. 2018. Thinking Strategically about China and the U.S. in Latin America: A Riposte to Evan Ellis, Global Americans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, W. M., Knill, C. and Eckhard, S. 2016. International Bureaucracy Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research. London: The Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, Stephen, and Ivan Oelrich. 2016. Future Warfare in Western Pacific. International Security 41: 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg News, 2018. China to Lend Venezuela $5 Billion as Maduro Visits Beijing [online]. Available at https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-13/china-to-give-venezuela-5-billion-loan-as-maduro-visits-beijing [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • CCF. 2015. Declaración de Beijing. Beijing: China-CELAC Forum. Available at http://www.chinacelacforum.org/esp/zywj_4/t1230940.htm [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Char, J. 2016. Reclaiming the Party’s Control of the Gun: Bringing Civilian Authority Back in China’s Civil-Military Relations. Journal of Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Li. 2014. China’s Communist Party-State: The Structure and Dynamics of Power. In Politics in China: An Introduction, ed William Joseph. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Daily. 2017. China-Latin America industrial park launched. Chinadaily.com.cn [online] Available at http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2017-11/10/content_34355571.htm [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • China. 2015. China’s Military Strategy. The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. Available at https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2015/05/27/content_281475115610833.html [Accessed 26 October 2022].

  • China-CELAC Forum. 2015. Cooperation Plan (2015–2019) [online]. Available at http://www.chinacelacforum.org/eng/zywj_3/t1230944.htm [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Coetzee, Eben. 2019. No Rest for the Weary: Competition and Emulation in International Politics. A Waltzian Perspective. South African Journal of Political Studies 46 (June): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordesman, Anthony, and Kendall, Joseph. 2017. Chinese Strategy and Military Modernization in 2017: A Comparative Analysis. Washington D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, S. 2018. The Chinese-backed Nicaragua Canal: Domestic Rationale, Multiple Risks, and Geopolitical Implications. In Building Development For a New Era, ed Enrique Dussel Peters, Ariel C. Armony and Shoujun Cui, 144–163. Mexico City: RED ALC-CHINA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danner, Lukas. 2018. China’s Grand Strategy: Contradictory Foreign Policy?’. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delreux, T., and J. Adriaensen. 2017. The Principal Agent Model and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. and A. Armony. 2017. Effects of China on the Quantity and Quality of Jobs in Latin America and the Caribbean, 17. Lima: ILO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. 2015. The Omnipresent Role of China’s Public Sector in its Relationship with Latin America and the Caribbean. In Beyond Raw Materials: Who are the Actors in Latin America and Caribbean-China Relationship?, ed. E. Dussel and A. Armony, 50–72. Buenos Aires: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. 2017. ‘América Latina y el Caribe y China: Economía, comercio e inversión 2017. Ciudad de Mexico: Unión de Universidades de América Latina y el Caribe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E. 2021. New directions in the deepening Chinese-Argentine Engagement, Global Americans. Available at https://bit.ly/3zUWJru [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Ellis, Evan. 2018. The Future of Latin America and the Caribbean in the Context of the Rise of China. Washington D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, John. 2018. On Grand Strategy. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnaut, Ross, Ligang Song, and Cai Fang. 2018. China’s 40 Years of Reform and Development 1978–2018. Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • General Administration of Customs People’s Republic of China, 2018. 2018 Bulletin [online] Available at http://english.customs.gov.cn/statics/report/monthly.html [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Global Infrastructure Hub. 2017. Global Infrastructure Outlook: Infrastructure Investment Needs 50 Countries, 7 sectors to 2040. Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney. https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/recent-releases/Global-Infrastructure-Outlook.

  • González, E., 2018. Macron diz que política ambiental de Bolsonaro é obstáculo para acordo com Mercosul [online] El País. Available at https://bit.ly/2X5HWLW [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Gourevitch, Peter. 1978. The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics. International Organization 32: 881–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, R. 2013. Regional China. London: The Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Ian. 2014. The Second Image Traversed: Waltz’s Theory of Foreign Policy. Australian Journal of Political Science 49: 535–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakóbowski, Jakub. 2018. Chinese-led Regional Multilateralism in Central and Eastern Europe, Africa and Latin America: 16+1, FOCAC, and CCF. Journal of Contemporary China 27: 659–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, You. 2014. The PLA and Diplomacy: Unraveling Myths About the Military Role in Foreign Policymaking. Journal of Contemporary China 23: 236–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C.K., 2017. Xi’s Signature Governance Innovation: The Rise of Leading Small Groups [online] Csis.org. Available at https://www.csis.org/analysis/xis-signature-governance-innovation-rise-leading-small-groups [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Johnson, Christopher, and Scott Kennedy. 2017. Xi’s Signature Governance Innovation: The Rise of Leading Small Groups. Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2017. Available at https://encurtador.com.br/opwOP [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Kettl, Donald. 2006. Public Bureaucracies. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, ed R.A.W. Rhodes, Sarah Binder, and Bert A. Rockman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koleski, Katherine, and Alec Blivas. 2018. China’s Engagement with Latin America and the Caribbean. U.S.-China Economic Security Review Commission, Staff Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. 2018. China’s Central Conference 2018: CPC to Play Greater Role in Foreign Affairs—A Preliminary Analysis. Indian Council of World Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, H., and S. Kang. 2014. Domestic Bureaucratic Politics and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China 23 (86): 294–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Dawisson, Carlos Faria, and Manoel Santos. 2016. Foreign Policy Analysis in Latin American Democracies: The Case for a Research Protocol. Revista Brasileira De Política Internacional 59: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, C. 2020. Ibero-American Perceptions of the Future World Order, Adolfo Suarez Memorial Debate. Available at https://iep.lisboa.ucp.pt/pt-pt/asset/7651/file [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Milner, Helen, and Dustin Tingley. 2015. Sailing the Water’s Edge: The Domestic Politics of American Foreign Policy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2018 [online]. Available at https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Myers, M., and K. Gallagher. 2017. Chinese Finance to LAC in 2016. The Dialogue. https://www.bu.edu/gdp/files/2017/11/Chinese-Finance-to-LAC-in-2016-Web-and-email-res.pdf.

  • Overbeek, Henk. 2016. Will the BRICS transform the global economic order?. In China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ Initiative and International Society, ed. Dai Changzheng and Wang Hongyu. Beijing: the University of International Business and Economics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Business Group. 2020. How will the International Covid-19 Outbreak Impact the Belt and Road Initiative? COVID-19 Economic Impact Assessment. Available at https://bit.ly/3hgZBI6 [Accessed 9 September 2021].

  • Oxford Business Group. 2021. Has Covid-19 Prompted the Belt and Road Initiative to Go Green? COVID-19 Economic Impact Assessment. 28 January 2021. Available at https://bit.ly/2X2JRAW [Accessed 9 September 2021].

  • Poh, Angela, and Mingjiang Li. 2017. A China in Transition: The Rhetoric and Substance of Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping. Asian Security 13: 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Political Settlements Research Programme, 2020. Cooperation in Latin America: Responses to COVID-19 Expose Existing Cracks in Regional Infrastructure. Available at https://bit.ly/3BSblbJ [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • PRC Government. 2015. ‘China’s Military Strategy.’ Beijing: State Council Information Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRC Government. 2016a. The 13th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China (2016a–2020). Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRC Government. 2016b. Basic Information About China-CELAC Forum. Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRC Government. 2016c. China’s Policy Paper on Latin America and the Caribbean. Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRC Government. 2018. The Facts and China’s Position on China-US Trade Friction. Beijing: Information Office of the State Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRC Government. 2021a. Poverty Alleviation: China’s Experience and Contribution. Beijing: State Council Information Office. Available at https://encurtador.com.br/lqQT1 [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • PRC Government. 2021b. The 14th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China (2021–2025). Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. 2020a. China says One-Fifth of Belt and Road Projects ‘Seriously Affected’ by the Pandemic. 19 June 2020. Available at https://reut.rs/3nbqgK9 [Accessed 9 September 2021].

  • Reuters. 2020b. Tren bioceánico por Bolivia necesita a Brasil, pero Bolsonaro mira a Chile: ministro peruano. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/peru-brasil-idLTAKBN1ZM2P.

  • Riggirozzi, Pía, and Diana Tussie. 2012. The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism, the case of Latin America. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rixen, Thomas, Lora Viola, and Michael Zürn. 2016. Historical Institutionalism and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Russel, and Juan Tokatlian. 2014. Grand Strategy. In Routledge Handbook of Latin America in the World, ed. Jorge Dominguez and Ana Covarrubias. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P., and D. Mazmanian. 1980. The Implementation of Public Policy: A Framework for Analysis. Policy Studies Journal 8: 538–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweller, Randall. 2018. Opposite but Compatible Nationalisms: A Neoclassical Realist Approach to the Future of US-China Relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 11: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaofeng, C. 2011. Has China’s Foreign Energy Quest Enhanced Its Energy Security? The China Quarterly 207: 600–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shue, Vivienne, and Patricia Thornton. 2017. To govern China: Evolving Practices of Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L., 2018. ¿Cómo potenciar la relación entre China, Brasil, México y Argentina, para la Cumbre del G20 en Buenos Aires 2018?, Papers de REDCAEM 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urdinez, F., et al. 2016. Chinese Economic Statecraft and U.S. Hegemony in Latin America: An Empirical Analysis, 2003–2014. University of Miami: Latin American Politics and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congressional Research Service. 2021. China’s Engagement with Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington: US Congressional Research Service. Available at https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/IF10982.pdf [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • US Government. 2017. National Security Strategy. Washington: GPO. Available at https://encurtador.com.br/fqrMV [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • US Government. 2021. Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. Washington: GPO. Available at https://encurtador.com.br/ozFNP [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Vadell, J.A. 2021. China’s Bilateral and Minilateral Relations with Latin America and the Caribbean: The Case of China-CELAC Forum. Area Development and Policy [forthcoming].

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadell, J.A. 2018. China in Latin America: South-South Cooperation with Chinese Characteristics, Latin America Perspectives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, Stephen. 2018a. US Grand Strategy After the Cold War: Can Realism Explain It? Should Realism Guide It? International Relations 32: 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walt, Stephen. 2018b. The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of U.S Primacy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth. 2009. Realism and International Politics. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenxian, Zang, Ilan Alon, and Cristoph Lattermann. 2018. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Changing the Rules of Globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, C., and V.C. Ching. 2017. Conceptualizing China-Latin America Relations in the Twenty-First Century: The Boom, the Bust, and the Aftermath. The Pacific Review 31 (5): 553–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2021a. GDP growth (annual %)—China. The World Bank Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=CN.

  • World Bank. 2021b. GDP per capita (current US$)—China. The World Bank Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=CN.

  • Xi, Jinping, 2017a. Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. Beijing. Available at https://encurtador.com.br/krHL1 [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Xi, Jinping. 2017b. The Governance of China, vol. 2. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinhua. Full Text of the Resolution on the Amendment to CPC Constitution. 24 October 2017. Available at https://encurtador.com.br/dtHT9 [Accessed on 11 September 2021].

  • Yan, Xuetong. 2014. From Keeping a Low Profile to Striving for Achievement. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7 (4): 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pou027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanan, Lu. 2018. China’s Merchandise Trade with Belt and Road Countries Tops $5 Trillion in 5 Years. People’s Daily. 31 August 2018. Available at http://en.people.cn/n3/2018/0831/c90000-9496013.html [Accessed 11 September 2021].

  • Yang, Z., 2015. Key Actors in China’s Engagement in Latin America and the Caribbean: Government, Enterprises, and Quasi-Governmental Organizations. In Beyond Raw Materials: Who are the Actors in Latin America and Caribbean-China Relationship? ed. E. Dussel and A. Armony, 73–85. Buenos Aires: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Denghua. 2018. The Concept of ‘Community of Common Destiny’ in China’s Diplomacy: Meaning, Motives and Implications. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 5: 196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Suisheng. 2016. The Making of China’s Foreign Policy in the 21st Century: Historical Sources, Institutions/Players, and Perceptions of Power Relations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Grant number 309208/2017-3), from the Scientific Research Fund of Renmin University of China (The Fundamental Research Fund for China’s Central Universities, Grant number 14XNJ005), as well as from the Confucius Institute Headquarters (China Studies Program-Understanding China Fellow) helped to research this article. The authors wish to thank Aline Gazola Hellmann, Zhang Zheng, Beatriz Vieira Rauber, Victoria Ellwanger Pires, Victor Hugo Dresch da Silva, and Francisco Fabris for their assistance. In addition to the editorial team and the anonymous reviewers, we wish to thank Lucas Paes Oliveira, Javier Vadell, and Enrique Dussel for their comments on an earlier draft of this text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Cepik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shoujun, C., Cepik, M. (2023). China’s Foreign Policy Toward Latin America: Context, Decision, Implementation. In: Schneider, A., Teixeira, A.G. (eds) China, Latin America, and the Global Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18026-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18026-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18025-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18026-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics