Skip to main content

Monoleaflet Tilting Disc Valves

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Heart of Carbon
  • 171 Accesses

Abstract

Three companies (Medical Incorporated, Shiley Laboratories, and Kastec, Inc.) began providing five different versions of tilting disc valves. Two emanated from the University of Minnesota, conceived by Walt Lillehei and Robert Kaster and covered by patents owned by the University. Another was conceived by Don Shiley, previously employed by Edwards Laboratories, who patented an alternative design called the Bjork-Shiley valve with a carbon occluder and metallic struts. There was legal action by the University of Minnesota, but the court ultimately ruled the Shiley design did not infringe the University’s patents; however, continuing reports of metallic strut failures clouded the future for the Shiley valve. Over the same time frame, Medical Incorporated converted its Lillehei-Kaster valve to the Omniscience valve with a metallic orifice and a carbon occluder and then on to the development of an all carbon version called the Omnicarbon valve. In 1975, Bob Kaster split from Medical Incorporated to form Kastec, Inc. to pursue a unique design that was ultimately acquired in 1979 by Medtronic, Inc. and marketed as the Medtronic-Hall valve with General Atomic as supplier of Pyrolite discs. By 2003, Medical Incorporated sales of its Omnicarbon valve, facing Medical Carbon Research Institute’s newly introduced On-X valve technology that had received the CE mark in Europe and FDA approval in the United States, decided to cease doing business. At about the same time, a Special Report titled Twenty-Five Year Experience with the Bjork Shiley Convexo-Concave Heart Valve: A Continuing Clinical Concern, May 31, 2005 (Circulation, May 31, 2005) caused Shiley’s demise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Letter to Circulation 76;53:2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Starek PJK. Chapter 18: heart valve replacement and reconstruction: clinical issues and trends. In: PJK S, editor. Advantages and disadvantages of mechanical valves. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc; 1986. p. 221–35.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Callaghan JC, Coles J, Damie A. Six year clinical study of the use of the Omniscience valve prosthesis in 219 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9(1):240–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Teijeira FJ. Long-term experience with the omniscience cardiac valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998;7(5):540–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Misawa Y, et al. Twenty-two year experience with the omniscience prosthetic heart valve. ASAIO J. 2004;50:606–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kazui T, Yamada O, Yamagisi M. Aortic valve replacement with Omniscience and Omnicarbon valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52:236–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Misawa Y, Hasegawa T, Kato M. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;150(1):168–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiss P, Jenzen HR, Hoffmann A, et al. The Omnicarbon tilting-disc heart valve prosthesis A clinical and doppler echocardiographic follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106(4):599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thevenet A, Albat B. Long term follow-up of 292 patients after valve replacement with Omnicarbon prosthetic valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4(6):634–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abe T, Kamata K, Komatsu K, et al. Ten years’ experience of aortic valve replacement with the Omnicarbon valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(4):1182–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iguro Y, Moriyama Y, Yamashita M, et al. Clinical experience of 473 patients with the Omnicarbon prosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8(6):674–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Torregrosa S, Gomez-Plana J, Valera FJ, et al. Long-term clinical experience with the Omnicarbon prosthetic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:881–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Misawa Y, Fuse K, Saito T, et al. Fourteen year experience with the Omnicarbon prosthetic heart valve. ASAIO J. 2001;47(6):677–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurumisawa S, Kaminiski Y, Muraoka A, Misawa Y. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11:40–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blot WJ, Ibrahim M, Ivey TD, Acheson DE, Brookmeyer R, Weyman A, Defauw J, Smith JK, Harrison D. Twenty-five-year experience with the Bjӧrk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valve: a continuing clinical concern. Circulation. 2005;111:2850–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blackstone EH. Could it happen again? The Bjӧrk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valve story. Circulation. 2005;111:2717–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bjӧrk VO, Lindblom D. The Monostrut Bjӧrk-Shiley heart valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;6:11142–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. The Designer of Faulty Heart Valve Seeks Redemption in New Device, Barry Meir. The New York Times, April 17, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bokros JC, Haubold AD, Akins RJ, et al. The durability of mechanical heart valve replacements: past experiences and current trends in. In: Bodnar E, Frater RWM, editors. Replacement cardiac valves. New York: Pergamon Press, Inc; 1991. p. 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haubold AD, Bokros JC. Chapter 1: carbon in medical devices. In: Williams DF, editor. Biocompatibility of clinical implant materials, CRC series in biocompatibility, vol. 2. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc; 1981. p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Book entitled Replacement cardiac valves, Book eds by Endre Bodnar and Robert Frater. Pergamon Press USA, copyright 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid, Chapter 2, Bokros JC, et al. “The Durability of Mechanical Heart Valve Replacements: Past Experience and Current Trends,” Pages 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid, Chapter 15, Schoen FJ. Materials Considerations for Improved Cardiac Valve Prostheses.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bokros JC. Carbon in medical devices (The Pettinos lecture). Carbon. 1977;15:355–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bokros, J. (2023). Monoleaflet Tilting Disc Valves. In: Heart of Carbon . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17933-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17933-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17932-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17933-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics