Skip to main content

Bad Behaviour, Bad Bodies, Bad Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Standards, Stigma, Surveillance
  • 197 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is largely based on data generated from time spent in a London secondary school, in which I observed lessons, spoke with teachers and collected de jure and de facto language policy artefacts. I developed a theory of panlinguistic surveillance by examining how the body, gesture and various semiotic resources get policed alongside language in schools, showing how discourses of discipline intermingle with language ideologies, which co-construct ‘bad behaviour’, ‘bad bodies’ and ‘bad language’. This, I argue, is especially the case within policies rooted in deficit perspectives about language which are marketed under guises of scientific objectivity and social justice. I show how many of these policies, which run central to post-2010 language education reforms in England, are imports from north America, which themselves have roots in methods of urban policing and the punitive treatment of low-income, racialised speakers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In April 2021, the DfE released a video showing the then principal of Bedford Free School and CEO of Advantage Schools, Stuart Lock, talking about their corporeal discipline policy built on ‘sweating the small stuff’, which included the banning of speech in corridors and using standardised English at all times. See also Whitman (2008).

  2. 2.

    I obtained the demographics of the surveyed teachers via an FOI request (OUP, 2018b). Teachers were asked about the age range they teach, their job title and the subject they teach, but not about their race and ethnicity. The statistics for the report also show that students classified as being eligible for Free School Meals in the surveyed teachers’ schools were above the national average. The report also includes the exact survey questions, all of which are closed and assume the existence of a word gap—for example, ‘Roughly what percentage (%) of pupils in the following year groups would you classify as having a limited vocabulary to the extent that it impacts on their learning?’ The 2018 report was followed by another two in the following years (see Cushing, 2022a for an extended critique).

  3. 3.

    A third edition of TLAC was published in 2021, but here I base my discussion on the second edition, given that this was the edition used by NUA. In the third edition, Lemov appears to respond to criticisms of his deficit stances on language (e.g. Cushing, 2021) but fails to cite any of these or engage with them in any great detail. He also continues to confuse written and spoken standardised English—for whilst the critiques of TLAC have been aimed at his stance on spoken language, in the third edition, he writes ‘Several found my argument oppressive or offensive. For what it’s worth, they were all written in impeccable Standard English’ (Lemov, 2021: 185).

  4. 4.

    A card used by referees in various sports to formally notify a player of a rule violation. The card that Emily refers to did not exist as a physical object but was an imaginary one held up by management and other teachers, whilst the ‘rule-breaker’ was instructed to correct their ‘error’. When I did see this happen, it was always with some self-awareness of how dramatic it was and would cause embarrassment on all sides. But the fact is that it still happened and contributed to a general culture of sonic surveillance throughout the school.

References

  • Aggarwal, U. (2016). The ideological architecture of whiteness as property in educational policy. Educational Policy, 30(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avineri, N., Johnson, E., Brice-Heath, S., McCarty, T., Ochs, E., Kremer-Sadlik, T., Blum, S., Zentalla, A., Rosa, J., Flores, N., Alim, H. S., & Paris, D. (2015). Invited forum: Bridging the “language gap”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 25(1), 66–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, W., Dohrn, B., Ryers, R., & (eds). (2009). Zero tolerance: Resisting the drive for punishment in our schools: A handbook for parents, students, educators, and citizens. New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker-Bell, A. (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity and pedagogy. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactment in secondary schools. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baugh, J. (2017). Meaning-less differences: Exposing fallacies and flaws in ‘The Word Gap’ hypothesis that conceal a dangerous ‘Language Trap’ for low-income American families and their children. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I., McKeown, M., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I., McKeown, M., & Omanson, R. (1987). The effects and uses of diverse vocabulary instructional techniques. In M. McKeown & M. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147–163). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (1855). A lecture on the art of delivery and the influence of school discipline on public oratory. Talk delivered in Edinburgh, 1855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Engelmann, S. (1966). Teaching disadvantaged children in the pre-school. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1973). Class, codes and control. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfiglio, T. (2002). Race and the rise of standard American. Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boxer, A. (Ed.). (2019). The ResearchED guide to explicit & direct instruction. John Catt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, S. (2015). Dark matters: On the surveillance of blackness. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, A. (1904). Clear speaking and good reading. Longmans, Green, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2012). Verbal hygiene. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C., & Withers, A. J. (2019). A violent history of benevolence: Interlocking oppression in the moral economies of social working. University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, D., Ferri, B., & Annamma, S. (Eds.). (2016). DisCrit: Disability studies and critical race theory in education. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corella, M. (2021). “It’s better language”: The social meanings of academic language in an elementary classroom. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 19(2), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, I. (2020). The policy and policing of language in schools. Language in Society, 49(3), 425–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, I. (2021). Language, discipline and ‘teaching like a champion’. British Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, I. (2022a). Word rich or word poor? Deficit discourses, raciolinguistic ideologies and the resurgence of the ‘word gap’ in England’s education policy. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2102014

  • Cushing, I. (2022b). Raciolinguistic policy assemblages and white supremacy in teacher education. The Curriculum Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.173

  • DeBose, C. (2005). The sociology of African American language: A language planning perspective. Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1967). The disadvantaged child and the learning process. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, R. (2017). (Mis)interpreting urban youth language: White kids sounding black? Journal of Youth Studies, 20(5), 640–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot-Cooper, A. (2021). Black resistance to British policing. Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, N. (2020). From academic language to language architecture: Challenging raciolinguistic ideologies in research and practice. Theory in Practice, 59(1), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A. (2011). Lockdown high: When the schoolhouse becomes a jailhouse. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garćia, O., & Otheguy, R. (2017). Interrogating the language gap of young bilingual and didialectal students. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(1), 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, O., & Solorza, C. R. (2021). Academic language and the minoritization of U.S. bilingual Latinx students. Language and Education, 35(6), 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J. (1863). Introductory text-book to school education, method, and school management. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golann, J. (2018). Conformers, adaptors, imitators, and rejecters: How no-excuses teachers’ cultural toolkits shape their responses to control. Sociology of Education, 91(1), 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gove, M. (2013). Michael Gove speaks about the importance of teaching. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-speaks-about-the-importance-of-teaching

  • Graham, L. (2018). Student compliance will not mean ‘all teachers can teach’: A critical analysis of the rationale for ‘no excuses’ discipline. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(11), 1242–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (2014). Zero-tolerance and policing. In M. Reisig & R. Kane (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of police and policing (pp. 172–196). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. (2008). Getting in early: Primary schools and early intervention. The Smith Institute and the Centre for Social Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, K. (2021). Un-telling “The Eugenist’s Tale”: Early twentieth-century deaf writers on A. G. Bell and eugenics. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 15(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J. (2005). Reclaiming culture: Indigenous people and self-representation. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S. (2012). Zero benefit: Estimating the effect of zero tolerance discipline polices on racial disparities in school discipline. Educational Policy, 28(1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Johnson, E. (2021). The language gap: Normalizing deficit ideologies. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph-Salisbury, R. (2021). Teacher perspectives on the presence of police officers in English secondary schools: A critical race theory analysis. Race Ethnicity and Education, 24(4), 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulz, C. (2017). Factories for learning: Making race, class and inequality in the neoliberal academy. Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1970). The logic of nonstandard English. In F. Williams (Ed.), Language and poverty: Perspectives on a theme (pp. 153–189). Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2017). “Makes me wanna holler”: Refuting the “Culture of Poverty” discourse in urban schooling. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 673(1), 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemov, D. (2015). Teach like a champion 2.0. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemov, D. (2021). Teach like a champion 3.0. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemov, D., Hernandez, J., & Kim, J. (2012). Teach like a champion field guide: A practical resource to make the 49 techniques your own. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, I. (2015). The revolution that could change the way your child is taught. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/mar/11/revolution-changing-way-your-child-taught.

  • Lewis, O. (1966). The culture of poverty. Scientific American, 215(4), 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, R. (2017). Policing black lives: State violence in Canada from slavery to the present. Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijjar, J. S. (2018). Echoes of Empire: Excavating the colonial roots of Britain’s “War on Gangs”. Social Justice, 45(2/3), 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijjar, J. S. (2021). Police–school partnerships and the war on black youth. Critical Social Policy, 41(3), 491–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield and Colonial Office. (1953). African education: A study of educational policy and practice in British tropical Africa. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2019). Education inspection framework: Overview of research. Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • OUP. (2018a). Why closing the word gap matters: Oxford language report. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OUP. (2018b). Oxford language thought leadership: Final report. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piro, J. (2008). Foucault and the architecture of surveillance: creating regimes of power in schools, shrines, and society. Educational Studies, 44(1), 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, J. (1815). The village school improved. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, A. (2018). Closing the vocabulary gap. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, F. (1962). The culturally deprived child. Harper & Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. (2020, August). It’s soft bigotry to lower standards for minority kids. The Sunday Telegraph, 23, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, J. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26(2), 162–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, B., & Arrigo, B. (2018). Zero tolerance, social control, and marginalized youth in U.S. schools: a critical reappraisal of neoliberalism’s theoretical foundations and epistemological assumptions. Contemporary Justice Review, 21(1), 60–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilliam, R. (2018). Race and the undeserving poor. Agenda.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, W. (1836). Ramaseeana: Or a vocabulary of the peculiar language used by the thugs. G. H. Huttman, Military Orphan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, J. (2013). Dialect, interaction and class positioning at school: from deficit to difference repertoire. Language and Education, 27(2), 110–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman, A. (2018). Amanda Spielman at the Pre-school Learning Alliance annual conference. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/amanda-spielman-at-the-pre-school-learning-alliance-annual-conference

  • Stahl, G. (2018). Ethnography of a neoliberal school: Building cultures of success. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoever, J. (2016). The sonic color line: Race and the cultural politics of listening. New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, D. (2008). Sweating the Small Stuff: Inner-City Schools and the New Paternalism. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Cushing .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cushing, I. (2022). Bad Behaviour, Bad Bodies, Bad Language. In: Standards, Stigma, Surveillance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17891-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17891-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17890-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17891-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics