Skip to main content

Montenegrin Squaring of the Circle: Between Russophilia, Pan-Orthodoxia, and Competing Nationalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pan-Slavism and Slavophilia in Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe

Abstract

This study seeks to examine the roles of the political coalition Democratic Front (DF) and the Serbian Orthodox Church (SOC) as key actors in the promotion of Russophilia, Eastern Orthodoxy, and Slavic heritage in Montenegro. We argue that the Slavophilic concept in Montenegro does not exist in its classical form. Rather, several intertwining manifestations that blend into Serbophile, Russophile, and Pan-Orthodox attitudes are connected with ethno-religious and political—rather than genuinely ‘pro-Slavic’—affinities. Although Slavic identity and Orthodox bonds represent useful references in political speeches, they constitute a minor rather than a prevailing argument in explaining current mutual affinities. Issues like the position of Serbs in neighbouring countries, the Montenegrin Orthodox Church’s request for autocephaly, and the legal status of the SOC incline towards the Russian state and Serbian religious institutions constitute an important element in understanding Montenegrin political developments, which are significantly more layered than what first meets the eye.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Milo, D. (2021). The Image of Russia in Central & Eastern Europe and the Western Balkans-Russia: Mighty Slavic Brother or Hungry Bear Next-Door? Report. Bratislava: GLOBSEC, available at: https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/image-of-russia-mighty-slavic-brother-or-hungry-bear-nextdoor-spreads.pdf. [Accessed 29th October 2021].

  2. 2.

    Kusovac, M. (2013). ‘Odnos Crne Gore i Rusije’, Matica Crnogorska, 2013/2014, pp. 53–72.

  3. 3.

    Šistek, F. (2011). ‘Clericalization of Nationalism, Interpreting the Religious Rivalry between Serbian and Montenegrin Orthodox Churches, 1989–2009’, In: Andras, M. T. and Rughinis C. (eds.), Spaces and Borders: Current Research on Religion in Central and Eastern Europe, Berlin/Boston, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co, p. 129.

  4. 4.

    Šljivić, D., and Živković, N. (2020). ‘Self-Ruled and Self-Consecrated Ecclesiastic Schism as a Nation-Building Instrument in the Orthodox Countries of South Eastern Europe’, Genealogy, 4(2), pp. 1–36.

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    RTV. (2018). Irinej: Srbi i Crnogorci jedan narod, iako podeljen, nismo razdeljen, available at: https://www.rtv.rs/sr_ci/drustvo/irinej-srbi-i-crnogorci-jedan-narod-iako-podeljen-nismo-razdeljen_958232.html. [Accessed 30th June 2021].

  7. 7.

    Bigg, C. (2009). Russian Patriarch’s Visit Creates Storm in Ukraine, available at: https://www.rferl.org/a/Russian_Patriarchs_Visit_Creates_Storm_In_Ukraine/1789959.html. [Accessed 20th July 2021].

  8. 8.

    Forbess, A. (2013). ‘Montenegro versus Crna Gora—The Rival Hagiographic Genealogies of the New Montenegrin Polity’, Focaal—Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 67, pp. 47–60.

  9. 9.

    Vlahović, P. (1995) ‘Srpsko poreklo Crnogoraca’, Srpsko pitanje na Balkanu, pp.157–168.

  10. 10.

    Jenne, E., and Bieber, F. (2014). ‘Situational Nationalism: Nation-Building in the Balkans, Subversive Institutions and the Montenegrin Paradox’, Ethnopolitics, 13(5), pp. 431–460.

  11. 11.

    Ibid, pp. 448–450.

  12. 12.

    Džankić, J. (2014). ‘Reconstructing the Meaning of Being “Montenegrin”’, Slavic Review, 73(2), pp. 347–371.

  13. 13.

    Hilton Saggau, E. (2019). ‘Kosovo Crucified—Narratives in the Contemporary Serbian Orthodox Perception of Kosovo’, Religions, 10(578), pp. 1–18.

  14. 14.

    Vukomanović, M. (2016). ‘Srpska pravoslavna crkva, desekularizacija i demokratija’, Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne, 10, pp. 269–279.

  15. 15.

    RTS. (2014). Đukanović na fresci u podgoričkoj crkvi?, available at: https://www.rts.rs/page/stories/sr/story/11/region/1507287/djukanovic-na-fresci-u-podgorickoj-crkvi.html. [Accessed 22nd July 2021].

  16. 16.

    MINA. (2018). Autokefalnost Ukrajinske crkve uticaće i na CG. Available at: http://www.rtcg.me/vijesti/drustvo/214771/autokefalnost-ukrajinske-crkve-uticace-i-na-cg.html. [Accessed 20th July 2021].

  17. 17.

    Janković, S. (2020). Amfilohije Radović: Mitropolit molitve i kletve, available at: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/mitropolit-amfilohije-in-memoriam/30919884.html. [Accessed 20th July 2021].

  18. 18.

    Nikolaidis, A. (2020). Političko_pravoslavlje_Crnu_Goru_vodi_put_Srbije_i_Rusije, available_at: https://balkans.aljazeera.net/opinions/2020/8/8/politicko-pravoslavlje-crnu-goru-vodi-put-srbije-i-rusije. [Accessed 20th July 2021].

  19. 19.

    Schwabach, A. (1999). ‘The Legality of the NATO Bombing Operation in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’, Pace International Law Review, 11(2), pp. 405–418.

  20. 20.

    Džankić, J., and Keil, S. (2017). ‘State-sponsored Populism and the Rise of Populist Governance: The Case of Montenegro’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 19(4), pp. 403–418.

  21. 21.

    Morrison, K. (2018). Nationalism, Identity and Statehood in Post-Yugoslav Montenegro. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 100–101.

  22. 22.

    Rojec, M., Mrak, M., Szemlér, T., and Novák T. (2007). ‘The Russian Economic Penetration in Montenegro’, In Briefing Paper (Brussels: Directorate General xternal Policies of the Union, European Parliament).

  23. 23.

    Politika. (2020)._Amfilohije:_Da_nije_bilo_Rusa,_Đukanović_ne_bi_bio_predsednik, available_at: http://www.politika.rs/sr/clanak/448952/Amfilohije-Da-nije-bilo-Rusa-Dukanovic-ne-bi-bio-predsednik. [Accessed 24th July 2021).

  24. 24.

    Jovićević, B. (2006). Rusija već priznala crnogorsku državu, available at: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/672395.html. [Accessed 20th July 2021].

  25. 25.

    Komnenić, P. (2016). ‘Marković: Jasno je ko finansira crnogorsku opoziciju’, Radio Slobodna Evropa, 14 September, available at: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/dusko-markovic-izbori/27987680.html. [Accessed 10th June 2021].

  26. 26.

    Morrison, K. (2018), pp. 169–172.

  27. 27.

    Forbess, A. (2013). ‘Montenegro versus Crna Gora, The rival hagiographic genealogies of the new Montenegrin polity’, Focaal—Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 67, pp. 47–60.

  28. 28.

    Đukanović, D. (2014). ‘„Identitetska pitanja” i linije unutrašnjih podela u Crnoj Gori’, Međunarodni problemi, 66(3–4), pp. 395–422.

  29. 29.

    Džankić, J., and Keil, S. (2017). ‘State-sponsored Populism and the Rise of Populist Governance: The Case of Montenegro’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 19(4), pp. 403–418.

  30. 30.

    Morrison, K. (2018), p. 141.

  31. 31.

    Ibid, pp. 140–141.

  32. 32.

    RSE. (2008). Amfilohije prokleo sve koji će priznati Kosovo, available at: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/870801.html. [Accessed 18th July 2021].

  33. 33.

    Morrison, K. (2018), pp. 141–144.

  34. 34.

    Bieber, F. (2020). The Rise of Authoritarianism in the Western Balkans, Palgrave MacMillan, Cham.

  35. 35.

    Nova srpska demokratija (NSD). (2021). Program, available at: http://www.nova.org.me/stranica.php?id=2&tip=stranice. [Accessed 12th July 2021]; Demokratska narodna partija Crne Gore (DNP). (2021). Program, available at: http://www.dnpcg.me/program/. [Accessed 12th July 2021].

  36. 36.

    Komnenić, P. (2016). Lovćenska deklaracija—potpis bliže Rusiji, available at: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/lovcenska-deklaracija-potpis-blize-rusiji/27724013.html. [Accessed 12th July 2021].

  37. 37.

    Vijesti. (2016a). Nova potpisala sporazum sa Jedinstvenom Rusijom, available at: https://www.vijesti.me/vijesti/politika/139094/nova-potpisala-sporazum-sa-jedinstvenom-rusijom. [Accessed 4th June 2021]; DNP. (2016a). DNP potpisuje memorandum o saradnji sa Rodinom, available at: http://www.dnpcg.me/dnp-potpisuje-memorandum-o-saradnji-sa-rodinom/. [Accessed 4th June 2021].

  38. 38.

    NSD. (2021). Program (DNP). (2021) Program.

  39. 39.

    Vučković, V. (2016). ‘The Europeanization of Political Parties in Montenegro,’ Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 16 (3), pp. 36–55.

  40. 40.

    DNP. (2016). Tolstoj sa DF-om: San o savezu sa Rusijom ljepši i perspektivniji od “evropskog sna’, available at: http://www.dnpcg.me/tolstoj-sa-df-om-san-o-savezu-sa-rusijom-ljepsi-i-perspektivniji-od-evropskog-sna/. [Accessed 26th July 2021].

  41. 41.

    Conley, A. H., and Melino, M. (2019). ‘Russian influence in Montenegro: The Weaponization and Exploitation of History, Religion and Economics’, Center for Strategic & International Studies (May), pp. 1–5; Center for the Study of Democracy. (2018). ‘Assessing Russia’s Economic Footprint in Montenegro,’ CSD, Policy Brief no. 73, available at: https://csd.bg/publications/publication/policy-brief-no-73-assessing-russias-economic-footprint-in-montenegro/. [Accessed 16th July 2021].

  42. 42.

    DNP. (2016). Podrška Balkanskom savezu neutralnih država, available at: http://www.dnpcg.me/podrska-balkanskom-savezu-neutralnih-drzava/. [Accessed 16th July 2021].

  43. 43.

    Balkan Insight (BIRN). (2016). Montenegro Anti-NATO Activists Stage New Year Party, available at: https://balkaninsight.com/2016/01/13/montenegro-s-nato-foes-celebrate-orhtodox-new-year-eve-01-12-2016/. [Accessed 18th July 2021].

  44. 44.

    Morrison, K. (2018). pp. 157–159; DNP. (2017). Jedinstvena Rusija podržala Narodni referendum u Crnoj Gori, available at: http://www.dnpcg.me/jedinstvena-rusija-podrzala-narodni-referendum-u-crnoj-gori/. [Accessed 15th July 2021].

  45. 45.

    Vijesti. (2019). Rusi pomažu crkvu, medije i političare, available at: https://www.vijesti.me/vijesti/politika/412899/rusi-pomazu-crkvu-medije-i-politicare. [Accessed 17th July 2021].

  46. 46.

    Blic. (2019). Mandić i Knežević prenijeli Putinu pozdrave Srba iz Crne Gore, available at: https://www.blic.rs/vesti/politika/mandic-i-knezevic-preneli-putinu-pozdrave-srba-iz-crne-gore/rbj15f6. [Accessed 21st October 2021].

  47. 47.

    Novosti. (2020). Crna Gora je zemlja čuda, available at: https://www.novosti.rs/vesti/planeta.300.html:848748-Dr-Strahinja-Bulajic--Crna-Gora-je-zemlja-cuda. [Accessed 21st October 2021].

  48. 48.

    BBC. (2020). Parlamentarni izbori u Crnoj Gori: Izabrana nova Vlada, prvi put bez DPS-a predsednika Mila Đukanovića, available at: https://www.bbc.com/serbian/lat/balkan-55186317. [Accessed 11th July 2021].

  49. 49.

    Vijesti. (2017). Krenuo “referendumski karavan”: Od Podgorice do Brisela, available at: https://www.vijesti.me/vijesti/politika/92738/krenuo-referendumski-karavan-od-podgorice-do-brisela. [Accessed 21st October 2021]. RSE. (2017). U Podgorici spaljena NATO zastava, bez reakcije policije, available at: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/29860937.html. [Accessed 21st October 2021].

  50. 50.

    Digitalni forenzički centar (DFC). (2021). Uloga Rusije na Balkanu: Slučaj Crne Gore. Podgorica, DFC, pp. 20–22.

  51. 51.

    Vučković, V. (2021). Europeanizing Montenegro: The European Union, the Rule of Law, and Regional Cooperation. New York & London: Lexington Books, pp. 22–24.

  52. 52.

    DFC. (2021), pp. 48–49.

  53. 53.

    Morrison, K. (2018), p. 87.

  54. 54.

    Morrison, K. (2018), p. 87.

  55. 55.

    Deutsche Welle (DW). (2020). Crnogorska kvadratura (crkvenog kruga), available at: https://www.dw.com/bs/crnogorska-kvadratura-crkvenog-kruga/a-52024528. [Accessed 18 July 2021].

  56. 56.

    RSE. (2020). Mitropolit Amfilohije in memoriam, available at: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/mitropolit-amfilohije-in-memoriam/30919884.html. [Accessed 19th June 2021].

  57. 57.

    Vijesti. (2020b). SO Podgorica: CPC dobija zemljište od Glavnog grada za izgradnju hrama, available at: https://www.vijesti.me/vijesti/politika/495761/mikic-nece-lekcije-o-crnogorstvu-drzati-dps-i-djukanovic-koji-su-mitraljezima-isli-na-liberale. [Accessed 22nd June 2021].

  58. 58.

    Balkan Insight (BIRN). (2019). Montenegrin Parliament Adopts Religion Law Amid Furious Protests, available at: https://balkaninsight.com/2019/12/27/montenegrin-parliament-adopts-religion-law-amid-furious-protests/. [Accessed 16th June 2021].

  59. 59.

    Reuters. (2019). Montenegro’s parliament approves religious law despite protests, available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-montenegro-lawmaking-protests-idUSKBN1YV0WT. [Accessed 19th June 2021].

  60. 60.

    Reuters. (2020). Thousands in Montenegro march against religious law, available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-montenegro-protest-religion-idUSKBN20N0LL. [Accessed 11th June 2021].

  61. 61.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russian Federation. (2019). Comment by the Information and Press Department on the adoption of the law on religious rights in Montenegro, available at: https://www.mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/3988667?p_p_id=101_INSTANCE_cKNonkJE02Bw&_101_INSTANCE_cKNonkJE02Bw_languageId=en_GB. [Accessed 21st June 2021].

  62. 62.

    DFC. (2021), p.44.

  63. 63.

    Ibid. Vijesti. (2016b). Pravoslavna crkva—moćno oružje Putina, available at: https://www.vijesti.me/svijet/evropa/146389/pravoslavna-crkva-mocno-oruzje-putina. [Accessed 21st July 2021].

  64. 64.

    Veković, M., and Jevtić, M. (2019). ‘Render undo Caesar: Explaining Political Dimension of the Autocephaly Demands in Ukraine and Montenegro,’ Journal of Church and State, 61(4), pp. 591–609.

  65. 65.

    BBC. (2018). SPC i raskol izmedju Carigarda i Moskve: kome se privoleti carstvu, available at: https://www.bbc.com/serbian/lat/srbija-45887109. [Accessed 23rd July 2021].

  66. 66.

    Glas Amerike. (2019). Srpski patrijarh o situaciji u CG, oglasile se ruska crkva i vaseljenski patrijarh, available at: https://www.glasamerike.net/a/srpski-patrijarh-o-situaciji-u-cg-oglasile-se-ruska-crkva-i-vaseljenski-patrijarh/5224843.html. [Accessed 3rd July 2021].

  67. 67.

    Morrison, K. (2018), p. 83.

  68. 68.

    Ibid, p. 84.

  69. 69.

    RSE. (2020c). Đukanović: Ako SOC odbije dogovor, formiraćemo pravoslavnu crkvu u Crnoj Goru, available at: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/djukanovic-crna-gora-spc-pravoslavna-crkva-kriza/30619177.html. [Accessed 13th July 2021].

  70. 70.

    Veković, M., and Jevtić, M. (2019), p. 597.

  71. 71.

    Ibid, p. 605.

  72. 72.

    RTS. (2020). Đukanovic: Srpska pravoslavna crkva znacajan politički igrač u Crnoj Gori, available at: https://www.rts.rs/page/stories/sr/story/11/region/4182432/milo-djukanovic-srpska-pravoslavna-crkva-rusija.html. [Accessed 24th July 2021].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Vučković .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vučković, V., Petrović, M. (2023). Montenegrin Squaring of the Circle: Between Russophilia, Pan-Orthodoxia, and Competing Nationalism. In: Suslov, M., Čejka, M., Ðorđević, V. (eds) Pan-Slavism and Slavophilia in Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17875-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics