Skip to main content

Predicting the Seismic Performance of Typical R/C Residential Buildings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Technologies, Systems, and Applications VII (IAT 2022)

Abstract

Reinforced concrete structures constitute a significant part of the existing building stock in countries with earthquake risk such as Albania. An important portion of them have been designed according to pre-modern code requirements. In this context, during the 2019 Albanian earthquakes, these buildings did not perform well and there has been a widespread conviction that the earthquake vulnerability of existing residential buildings should be questioned. This study aims at studying the seismic assessment of two template residential buildings damaged during the recent earthquakes. The seismic safety assessment is done by pushover analysis. The analytical outcome shows that the intended level of performance is not satisfied for the studied buildings. Moreover, reasons for the inadequate performance of the selected buildings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bilgin, H., Hysenlliu, M.: Comparison of near and far-fault ground motion effects on low and mid-rise masonry buildings. J. Build. Eng. 30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101248

  2. Leti, M., Bilgin, H.: Performance of RC and masonry structures during 2019 Durrës earthquake. Civil Eng. Beyond Limits (CEBEL) 3(1) (2022). https://doi.org/10.36937/cebel.2022.1546

  3. Inel, M., Senel, S., Ün, H.: Experimental evaluation of concrete strength in existing buildings. Mag. Concr. Res. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2007.00091,60:279-289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozmen, H.B., Inel, M., Senel, S.M., Kayhan, A.H.: Load carrying system characteristics of existing Turkish RC building stock. Int. J. Civil Eng. 13(1), 76–91 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crowley, H., et al.: Model of seismic design lateral force levels for the existing reinforced concrete European building stock. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 19(7), 2839–2865 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01083-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Nikić, D., Pavić, G.: Seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structure by finite element analysis. Acta Phys. Polonica. A 135, 845–848 (2019). https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.135.845

  7. Işık, E., Harirchian, E., Bilgin, H., Jadhav, K.: The effect of material strength and discontinuity in RC structures according to different site-specific design spectra. J. Res. Eng. Struct. Mater. 7, 413–430 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Işık, E., Isik, M., Bülbül, M.: Web based evaluation of earthquake damages for reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquakes Struct. 13, 423–432 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. KTP-N.2–89.: KTP-89 Kushtet teknike te projektimit per ndertimet ne zona sizmike, (In Albanian) (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhulegu, E., Bilgin, H.: Seismic performance assessment of a reinforced concrete building designed using the albanian seismic code. In: Topping, B.H.V. (ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Computational Structure (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ATC-40.: seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, vol. 1–2, Redwood City, California (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. FEMA 2000.: prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal emergency management agency (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eurodoce 8.: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: Strengthening and repair of buildings – Final, Eurocode 8, Brussels (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. FEMA 440.: improvement of nonlinear seismic analysis procedures. Applied technology council, ATC55 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elnashai, A.: Zeus NL - A system for Inelastic Analysis of Structures, Urbana–Champaign: Creating a Multi-hazard Approach to Engineering (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. EN 12504–1.: Testing concrete in structures. Part 1: Cored specimens – Taking, examining and testing in compression (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mander, J.B., et al.: Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 114, 1804–1826 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  18. TBEC.: Turkish building earthquake code, Prime ministry, disaster and emergency management presidency (AFAD), Ankara (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marsed Leti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Leti, M., Bilgin, H. (2023). Predicting the Seismic Performance of Typical R/C Residential Buildings. In: Ademović, N., Mujčić, E., Mulić, M., Kevrić, J., Akšamija, Z. (eds) Advanced Technologies, Systems, and Applications VII. IAT 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17697-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics