Abstract
In this Chapter the notion of science identity is explored through the concept of ‘symbolic exchange’ which recognises that choice, consumption and participation are part of the reproduction of social relations and hierarchies and are bound up with status and power. Drawing on sociological theories of social reproduction, the Chapter highlights the exchange-value of studying science for school students, especially in physics and among high-achievers. Empirical data from 42 A-level Physics students (aged 16–18) in England inform the discussion, which focuses on student identity and aspirations in physics. In particular, the Chapter highlights examples of student decisions to study advanced-level physics due to its exchange-value and symbolic identity, which also constitutes a concern in the ‘leaky science participation pipeline’ debate and the ‘strengths’ of a physics identity more generally. The article concludes by exploring the opportunities of the concept of ‘symbolic exchange’ for research in young people’s science and physics trajectory, especially in the context of science identity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560077
Archer, L. (2019, May 16). Identities, inequalities, education: Sociology for social justice with youth in (and out) of school (UCL-IOE Professorial Public Lecture Series).
Archer, L., & DeWitt, J. (2017). Understanding young people’s science aspirations. Routledge.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). ‘Doing’ science versus ‘being’ a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902759053
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). ‘Balancing Acts’: Elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 21(1), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.748676
Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). ‘Science capital’: A conceptual and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
Archer, L., Moote, J., Francis, B., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2017a). Stratifying science: A Bourdieusian analysis of student views and experiences of school selective practices in relation to ‘Triple Science’ at KS4 in England. Research Papers in Education, 32(3), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1219382
Archer, L., Moote, J., Francis, B., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2017b). The “exceptional” physics girl: A sociological analysis of multimethod data from young women aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 88–126. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216678379
Archer, L., Moote, J., MacLeod, E., Francis, B., & DeWitt, J. (2020). ASPIRES 2: Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10–19. UCL Institute of Education.
Avraamidou, L. (2020). ‘I am a young immigrant woman doing physics and on top of that I am Muslim’: Identities, intersections, and negotiations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 311–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21593
Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a critique of the political economy of the sign (C. Levin, Trans.). Telos Press.
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. Routledge.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Routledge.
Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Education Research Journal, 50(1), 37–75. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212458142
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. C. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20413
Chimba, M., & Kitzinger, J. (2010). Bimbo or boffin? Women in science: An analysis of media representations and how female scientists negotiate cultural contradictions. Public Understanding of Science, 19(5), 609–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508098580
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Osborne, J. (2013). Nerdy, brainy and normal: Children’s and parents’ constructions of those who are highly engaged with science. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1455–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9315-0
DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Moote, J. (2018). 15/16-year-old students’ reasons for choosing and not choosing physics at A level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education., 17(6), 1071–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9900-4
Du, X., & Wong, B. (2019). Science career aspiration and science capital in China and UK: A comparative study using PISA data. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2136–2155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1662135
Francis, B., Archer, L., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., MacLeod, E., & Yeomans, L. (2017). The construction of physics as a quintessentially masculine subject: Young people’s perceptions of gender issues in access to physics. Sex Roles, 76(3), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z
Gill, T., & Bell, J. F. (2013). What factors determine the uptake of A-level physics? International Journal of Science Education, 35(5), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.577843
Godec, S., King, H., & Archer, L. (2017). The science capital teaching approach: Engaging students with science, promoting social justice. UCL Institute of Education.
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
Hazari, Z., Cass, C., & Beattie, C. (2015). Obscuring power structures in the physics classroom: Linking teacher positioning, student engagement, and physics identity development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 735–762. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21214
Hazari, Z., Brewe, E., Goertzen, R. M., & Hodapp, T. (2017). The importance of high school physics teachers for female students’ physics identity and persistence. The Physics Teacher, 55(2), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4974122
Institute of Physics. (2011). It’s different for girls: The influence of schools. Institute of Physics.
Institute of Physics. (2013). Closing doors: Exploring gender and subject choice in schools. Institute of Physics.
Institute of Physics. (2015). Opening doors: A guide to good practice in countering gender stereotyping in schools. Institute of Physics.
Joint Council for Qualifications. (2020a). GCE A level & GCE AS level: Results summer 2020. Joint Council for Qualifications. https://www.jcq.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/A-Level-and-AS-Results-Summer-2020.pdf
Joint Council for Qualifications. (2020b). GCSE (full course) outcomes for all grade sets and age breakdowns for UK candidates: Results summer 2020. Joint Council for Qualifications. https://www.jcq.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/GCSE-Full-Course-results-Summer-2020.pdf
Kemp, P. E. J., Berry, M., & Wong, B. (2018). The Roehampton computing education report: Data from 2017. University of Roehampton.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus group: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.) Sage.
Lawler, S. (2007). Identity: Sociological perspectives. Polity Press.
Lykkegaard, E., & Ulriksen, L. (2019). In and out of the STEM pipeline – A longitudinal study of a misleading metaphor. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1600–1625. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1622054
Marx, K. H. (1867). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Oekonomie von Karl Marx. Erster band. Buch I: Der Produktionsprocess des Kapitals. Hamburg: O. Meissner.
Masnick, A. M., Valenti, S. S., Cox, B. D., & Osman, C. J. (2010). A multidimensional scaling analysis of students’ attitudes about science careers. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902759053
Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. (2014). A survey of psychological, motivational, family and perceptions of physics education factors that explain 15-year-old students’ aspirations to study post-compulsory physics in English schools. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9404-1
Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2016). ‘I fall asleep in class … But physics is fascinating’: The use of large-scale longitudinal data to explore the educational experiences of aspiring girls in mathematics and physics. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1235743
Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: A review of the research on the participation of girls in physics. Institute of Physics.
Reiss, M. J. (2000). Understanding science lessons: Five years of science teaching. Open University Press.
Russell Group. (2018). A Russell Group guide to making decisions about post-16 education 2017/18 (6th ed.). Russell Group.
Sax, L. J., Lehman, K. J., Barthelemy, R. S., & Lim, G. (2016). Women in physics: A comparison to science, technology, engineering, and math education over four decades. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020108
Wong, B. (2012). Identifying with science: A case study of two 13yearold ‘high achieving working class’ British Asian girls. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.551671
Wong, B. (2015). Careers ‘from’ but not ‘in’ science: Why aspirations to be a scientist are challenging for minority ethnic students? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 979–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21231
Wong, B. (2016a). Minority ethnic students and science participation: A qualitative mapping of achievement, aspiration, interest and capital. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9466-x
Wong, B. (2016b). Science education, career aspirations and minority ethnic students. Palgrave.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wong, B. (2022). Student Identity, Aspiration and the Exchange-Value of Physics. In: Holmegaard, H.T., Archer, L. (eds) Science Identities. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17642-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17642-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17641-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17642-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)