Skip to main content

Towards an Active Predictive Relation by Reconceptualizing a Vacuum Robot: Research on the Transparency and Acceptance of the Predictive Behaviors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2022 - Late Breaking Papers. Multimodality in Advanced Interaction Environments (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13519))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 867 Accesses

Abstract

With the development of Artificial intelligence, the connected objects are extended with the predictive capabilities and the character of things can change to “things that predict”. If a connected device is able to embrace a predictive system that not only profiles for scripted behavior but could also use the knowledge co-created by all the other similar devices and their users that encounter similar situations, the predictions can be generated based on that. In this case, a new type of interplay between humans and things called “predictive relation” is created. However, before this future takes place, it is required to find out appropriate patterns to address challenges such as the transparency and users’ acceptance of predictive behaviors of connected products. The research in this article takes a vacuum robot as a reference product for the study. The research starts by collecting users’ daily practice with vacuum robots through 4-day diary booklets. And then the booklets serve as sensitizing tools to envision the possible predictive capabilities and lead the discussion on the acceptance and transparency of general predicting things. From the creative sessions we propose 1) design qualities for the acceptance of the predicting things, and 2) a model of generating predictive behavior that enhances the transparency. Eventually, we also propose the idea of “Designers as the facilitators of the human-robot collaboration”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rowland, C., Goodman, E., Charlier, M., Light, A., Lui, A.: Designing Connected Products: UX for the Consumer Internet of Things. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smit, I.: Designing predictive relations in more-than-human partnerships – Cities of Things. Cities of Things (2021). https://cityofthings.nl/2021/01/05/designing-predictive-relations-in-more-than-human-partnerships/

  3. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Floridi, L.: Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation. Int Data Privacy Law 7(2), 76–99 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Floridi, L., et al.: AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Mind Mach 28(4), 689–707 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beer, J.M., Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A.: Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction. J. Human-Robot Interaction 3(2), 74 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5898/jhri.3.2.beer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Franklin, S., Graesser, A.: Is it an agent, or just a program? a taxonomy for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Intelligent Agents, 21–35. Budapest Hungary (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0013570

  8. Murphy, R.: Introduction to AI Robotics, pp. 1–40. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thrun, S.: Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 19(1–2), 9–24 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, H.M.: Autonomy levels for unmanned systems (ALFUS) framework volume I: Terminology version 1.1. In: Proceedings of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NISTSP), Gaithersburg, MD (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sanders, E.B.: Virtuosos of the experience domain. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IDSA Education Conference (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Søraa, R.A., Nyvoll, P., Tøndel, G., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Serrano, J.A.: The social dimension of domesticating technology: Interactions between older adults, caregivers, and robots in the home. Technol. Forecast Soc. 167, 120678 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y.: Domestication of Media and Technology. McGraw-Hill Education (UK) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lie, M., Sørensen, K.H. (Eds.): Making Technology Our Own?: Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Scandinavian University Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C.: Service robots in the domestic environment. In: Proceeding of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ’06 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1121241.1121286

  16. Amershi, S., et al.: Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Published (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233

  17. Kuijer, L., Giaccardi, E.: Co-performance. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173699

  18. Frey, T.: Google Cloud AI Explanations to increase fairness, responsibility, and trust (2019). https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/google-cloud-ai-explanations-to-increase-fairness-responsibility-and-trust

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Nazli Cila for her contribution in the earlier stages of the research. Thanks to Yahong Li and Xuejing Feng for their comments and suggestions during the research and writing, as well as to all the participants for their fruitful insights in the creative session. The research was commissioned by the Cities of Things Delft Design Lab.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peicheng Guo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guo, P., Smit, I. (2022). Towards an Active Predictive Relation by Reconceptualizing a Vacuum Robot: Research on the Transparency and Acceptance of the Predictive Behaviors. In: Kurosu, M., et al. HCI International 2022 - Late Breaking Papers. Multimodality in Advanced Interaction Environments. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13519. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17618-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17618-0_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17617-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17618-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics