Skip to main content

Using MBSE for Conflict Managing TRIZ on a Systems Engineering Level

  • 316 Accesses

Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT,volume 655)

Abstract

The objective of the presented research is to find a method to identify and resolve high level conflicts with TRIZ applications in systems engineering on a parameter level. These conflicts are caused by several competing TRIZ problem solving patterns (innovative principles) on lower system levels. Here, interference parameters result from the physical adoption of the general innovative basic principles in a specific application context (e.g. vibration, heat, additional energy consumption). To manage these conflicts on a parameter level, the system engineering point of view is matched with the physical parameter level in the engineering design of a product. Within an experimental research approach, an exemplary MBSE system model of a technical device is used to resolve parameter conflicts on a higher system level. The conflicts only arise on a higher system level consideration, which makes computer-aided conflict identification essential to design engineers. The presented method does help system engineers to foresee conflict potentials of innovative principles on a system level and to control them accordingly using a MBSE system model approach.

Keywords

  • MBSE
  • Systems engineering
  • Systematic innovation
  • Methodology
  • Engineering design

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-17288-5_4
  • Chapter length: 11 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-031-17288-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

References

  1. Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M.: Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. ISBN 0-875847544

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ilevbare, I.M., Probert, D., Phaal, R.: A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation 33(2–3), 30–37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.003

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Moehrle, M.G.: How combinations of TRIZ tools are used in companies - results of a cluster analysis. R and D Management 35(3), 285–296 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00390.x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Bielefeld, O.: Development of a Methodology for a Model-Based and Holistic Failure Analysis. Dissertation, University of Wuppertal, Germany (2021). https://doi.org/10.25926/s3ne-nc15

  5. Orloff, M.A.: Inventive Thinking Through TRIZ. A Practical Guide. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33223-7

  6. Weilkiens, T.: Systems Engineering with SySML/UML, Elsevier (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. INCOSE: Systems Engineering Vision 2020: V2.03. http://oldsite.incose.org/productspubs/pdf/sevision2020_20071003_v2_03.pdf. Last Accessed 12 May 2017

  8. Bielefeld, O., Sizikov, V., Schlüter, N.: Research of the possibilities for using and linking TRIZ methods with systems engineering. In: Benmoussa, R., De Guio, R., Dubois, S., Koziołek, S. (eds.) TFC 2019. IAICT, vol. 572, pp. 174–186. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32497-1_15

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Bielefeld, O., Sizikov, V., Schlüter, N., Löwer, M., Katzwinkel, T., Schleicht, A.: Quantification of influences between components, functions and process usage stages by linking TRIZ methods and systems engineering. In: Cavallucci, D., Brad, S., Livotov, P. (eds.) TFC 2020. IAICT, vol. 597, pp. 292–303. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61295-5_24

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Stühler, B., Bielefeld, O.: Untersuchung der Kopplungsmöglichkeiten Zwischen Generic Systems Engineering und dem TRIZ-Ansatz. Lehrstuhl Produktsicherheit und Qualität, Wissenschaftstag (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harper, C.: What Is Coil Whine – What does it sound like – how to fix it. In: CGdirector. https://www.cgdirector.com/fix-coil-whine/. Last Accessed 29 May 2022

  12. Mann, D.: Matrix 2010: Re-updating the TRIZ Contradiction Matrix. IFR Press, Clevedon (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chang, H.-T., Chen, J.L.: Eco-Innovative examples for 40 TRIZ inventive principles. In: The TRIZ Journal, 1–16 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Julitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Julitz, T., Löwer, M., Katzwinkel, T. (2022). Using MBSE for Conflict Managing TRIZ on a Systems Engineering Level. In: Nowak, R., Chrząszcz, J., Brad, S. (eds) Systematic Innovation Partnerships with Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology. TFC 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 655. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17288-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17288-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17287-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17288-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)