Abstract
This chapter shifts the focus to examine how family is culturally constructed and practised in order to reclaim conventional forms of family and gender norms in contemporary China. Informed by Morgan’s ‘family practices’ approach, special attention has been paid to the lived experiences of a group of six ‘study mothers’ (peidu mama) who accompany their children to study while living apart from their partner. Their stories serve as examples to demonstrate both the multiple underlying reasons behind married couples living apart and the coping strategies developed by different family members. Doing gender in a way that is congruent with cultural and social expectations of gender roles serves to reinforce the normativity of heterosexuality. Through looking at their everyday doing of family, I discuss how family practices are subject to cultural interpretations and social constraints, and how identity negotiations are formed and affected by certain cultural and social contexts. For a woman, being a full-time study mother, even when it is at the cost of living separately from her partner and established career development, has been considered as a way to privilege ‘motherhood’ over ‘wifehood’. The dramatically opposite parenting roles reinforce and entrench the existing traditional gendered division of the labour and gender hierarchy in contemporary Chinese society. This research suggests that family practices in the multi-local household setting are often closely implicated with practices of gender, class, mothering and social norms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
At that time, there was a widely spread discourse in relation to education, defined as ‘knowledge is useless’.
- 2.
The guan is often used as a verb and literally means ‘to control’. In the context of Chinese parenting practices, it is associated with more positive connotation in terms of caring, loving and discipline. See Tobin et al. (1989) for more discussion about Chinese parenting styles.
- 3.
Wangba (internet café) was seen by many Chinese parents as harmful due to their stereotypical views on the environment of internet cafés, which are often full of smoke with some ‘disreputable’ youths coming in and out (Sun, 2012). Parents of school-aged teenagers feel a sense of being out of control when faced with online gaming and ‘unhealthy’ online information, and therefore tend to control children’s internet usage.
- 4.
Hou hui yao literally means regret pills. In this context, this slang connotes that there is no going back because it is too late to regret if children were ill-behaved when parents are not around to look after them.
- 5.
Guang chang wu (square dancing) is a collective dancing activity practised in public spaces. Although this fitness activity has been criticised for noise pollution (Huang & Mi, 2015; Zhang, 2016), it is popular among dama (grannies) who are middle-aged and retired in rural and urban China (Martin & Chen, 2020).
References
Aarseth, H., & Olsen, B. M. (2008). Food and masculinity in dual career couples. Journal of Gender Studies, 17(4), 277–287.
Altintas, E., & Sullivan, O. (2016). Fifty years of change updated: Cross-national gender convergence in housework. Demographic Research, 35(16), 455–470.
Attree, P. (2005). Low-income mothers, nutrition and health: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 1(4), 227–240.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
Bedford, O. A. (2004). The individual experience of guilt and shame in Chinese culture. Culture & Psychology, 10(1), 29–52.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. R. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Chao, R. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111–1119.
Chee, M. (2003). Migrating for the children: Taiwanese American women in transnational families. In N. Piper & M. Roces (Eds.), Wife or worker? Asian women and migration (pp. 137–156). Rowman & Littlefield.
Choi, Y. S. (2006). The phenomenon of ‘geese-families’: Marital separation between geese-fathers and geese-mothers. Family and Culture, 18(2), 37–65.
Choi, S. Y., & Peng, Y. (2016). Masculine compromise: Migration, family, and gender in China. University of California Press.
CNNIC. (2016). 2015年中国青少年上网行为研究报告 [The 2015 China teenager net behaviour investigation report] [Online]. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/qsnbg/201608/t20160812_54425.htm
Croll, E. J. (2006). The intergenerational contract in the changing Asian family. Oxford Development Studies, 34, 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810601045833
De Vault, M. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. University of Chicago Press.
Devasahayam, T., & Yeoh, B. (2007). Working and mothering in Asia: Images, ideologies and identities. NUS Press.
Faircloth, C. (2015). Negotiating intimacy, equality and sexuality in the transition to parenthood. Sociological Research Online, 20(4), 3. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3705
Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81.
Fong, V. L. (2004). Only hope: Coming of age under Chinas one-child policy. Stanford University Press.
Gabb, J. (2008). Researching intimacy in families. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gabb, J., & Fink, J. (2015). Couple relationships in the 21st century: Research, policy and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gillies, V. (2005). Raising the ‘meritocracy: Parenting and the individualization of social class. Sociology, 39(5), 835–853.
Gillis, J. (1996). A world of their own making. Harvard University Press.
Goh, E. (2011). China’s one-child policy and multiple caregiving: Raising little suns in Xiamen. Routledge.
Gross, G. (2005). The detraditionalization of intimacy reconsidered. Sociological Theory, 23(3), 286–311.
Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
Hockey, J., Meah, A., & Robinson, V. (2007). Mundane heterosexualities: from theory to practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Honig, E., & Hershatter, G. (1988). Personal voices: Chinese women in the 1980’s. Stanford University Press.
Huang, Y. J., & Mi, L. (2015). The noisy individual and the silent mass: An survey of the social ecology of contemporary China in square dance. China Social Sciences Press.
Huang, S., & Yeoh, B. (2005). Transnational families and their children’s education: China’s ‘study mothers’ in Singapore. Global Networks, 5(4), 379–400.
Inoguchi, T., & Shin, D. C. (2009). The quality of life in Confucian Asia: From physical welfare to subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 183–190.
Irwin, S., & Elley, S. (2011). Concerted cultivation? Parenting values, education and class diversity. Sociology, 45(3), 480–495.
Jackson, S. (2001). Why a materialist feminism is (still) possible-and necessary. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(3–4), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(01)00187-X
Jackson, S. (2006). Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality. Feminist Theory, 7(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700106061462
Jackson, S. (2011). Materialist feminism, the self and global late modernity: Some consequences for intimacy and sexuality. In A. Jonasdottir, V. Bryson, & K. Jones (Eds.), Sexuality, gender and power: Intersectional and transnational perspectives (pp. 15–29). Routledge.
James, A., & Curtis, P. (2010). Family displays and personal lives. Sociology, 44(6), 1163–1180.
Jamieson, L. (2011). Intimacy as a concept: Explaining social change in the context of globalisation or another form of ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 151–163.
Jeong, Y. J., You, H. K., & Kwon, Y. I. (2014). One family in two countries: Mothers in Korean transnational families. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(9), 1546–1564.
Ji, Y. (2015). Asian families at the crossroads: A meeting of east, west, tradition, modernity, and gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1031–1038.
Ji, Y., Wu, X., Sun, S., & He, G. (2017). Unequal care, unequal work: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of gender inequality in post-reform urban China. Sex Roles, 77(11), 765–778.
Ko, C., Yen, J., Chen, C., Chen, S., & Yen, C. (2005). Gender differences and related factors affecting online gaming addiction among Taiwanese adolescents. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(4), 273–277.
Lee, Y., & Koo, H. (2006). Wild geese fathers’ and a globalised family strategy for education in Korea. IDPR, 28(4), 532–553.
Lim, H. J., & Skinner, T. (2012). Culture and motherhood: Findings from a qualitative study of east Asian mothers in Britain. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(3), 327–343.
Liu, J. (2014). Ageing, migration and familial support in rural China. Geoforum, 51, 305–312.
Liu, F. (2016). The rise of the “priceless” child in China. Comparative Education Review, 60(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1086/684457
Liu, J. (2022). Childhood in urban China: A three-generation portrait. Current Sociology, 70(4), 598–617.
Martin, R., & Chen, R. (2020). The people’s dance: The power and politics of Guangchang Wu. Springer Nature.
Mehra, R. (1997). Women, empowerment, and economic development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554(1), 136–149.
Morgan, D. (1996). Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge Polity.
Morgan, D. (2020). Family practices in time and space. Gender, Place & Culture, 27(5), 733–743.
National Bureau of Statistics (2019). 2018年全国时间利用调查公报 [2018 National Time Use Survey Bulletin] [Online]. Retrieved March 18, 2019, from http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201901/t20190125_1646796.html
Parish, W., & Farrer, J. (2000). Gender and family. In W. Tang & W. Parish (Eds.), Chinese urban life under reform: The changing social contract (pp. 232–272). Cambridge University Press.
Qiu, S. (2020). Chinese ‘study mothers’ in living apart together (LAT) relationships: Educational migration, family practices, and gender roles. Sociological Research Online, 25(3), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419871574
Reay, D. (2000). A useful extension of Bourdieu’s conceptual framework? Emotional capital as a way of understanding mothers’ involvement in their children’s education? The Sociological Review, 48(4), 568–585.
Roseneil, S. (2006). On not living with a partner: Unpicking coupledom and cohabitation. Sociological Research Online, 11(3), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1413
Scott, S. (2009). Making sense of everyday life. Polity.
Shek, D. T. L. (2006). Chinese family research: Puzzles, progress, paradigms, and policy implications. Journal of Family Issues, 27(3), 275–284.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Sage.
Shu, X., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Patriarchy, resources, and specialisation: Marital decision-making power in urban China. Journal of Family Issues, 34(7), 885–917.
Smart, C. (2007). Personal life. Polity Press.
Smart, C., & Neale, B. (1999). Family fragments? Polity Press.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research: Perspectives on practice. Routledge.
Sun, H. (2012). Internet policy in China: A field study of Internet Cafes. Lexington Books.
The State Council Information Office. (2022). China voices. [Online] Retrieved June 6, 2022, from http://english.scio.gov.cn/chinavoices/2022-05/31/content_78245753.htm
Tobin, J., Wu, D., & Davidson, D. (1989). Preschool in three cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Upton-Davis, K. (2015). Subverting gendered norms of cohabitation: Living Apart Together for women over 45. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(1), 104–116.
Wan, Y. (2006). Expansion of Chinese higher education since 1998: Its causes and outcomes. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 19–31.
Wang, Y., & Lim, S. S. (2017). Mediating intimacies through mobile communication Chinese migrant mothers’ digital ‘bridge of magpies’. In R. Andreassen, M. N. Petersen, K. Harrison, M. N. Petersen, & T. Raun (Eds.), Mediated intimacies: Connectivities, relationalities, proximities (pp. 159–178). Routledge.
Wang, Q., Pomerantz, E. M., & Chen, H. (2007). The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, 78, 1592–1610.
Waters, J. (2005). Transnational family strategies and education in the contemporary Chinese diaspora. Global Networks, 5(4), 359–377.
Waters, J. (2010). Becoming a father, missing a wife: Chinese transnational families and the male experience of lone parenting in Canada. Population, Space, and Place, 16(1), 63–74.
Waters, J. (2015). Educational imperatives and the compulsion for credentials: Family migration and children’s education in East Asia. Children’s Geographies, 13(3), 280–293.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.
Wilding, R. (2018). Families, intimacy and globalisation: Floating ties. Palgrave.
Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
Zhan, H. J., & Rhonda, J. V. (2003). Gender and elder care in China: The influence of filial piety and structural constraints. Gender & Society, 17(2), 209–229.
Zhang, Z. S. (2016). Group excitement in the age of individualization—Square-dancing and “Chinese grannies” in sociological perspective. The Journal of Humanities, 3, 116–122.
Zhang, Y., Kao, G., & Hannum, E. (2007). Do mothers in rural China practice gender equality in educational aspirations for their children? Comparative Education Review, 51(2), 131–157.
Zhou, M. (1998). ‘Parachute kids’ in Southern California: The educational experience of Chinese children in transnational families. Educational Policy, 12(6), 682–704.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Qiu, S. (2022). Doing Family at a Distance: How Different Are LAT Relationships to ‘Conventional’ Partnerships?. In: Gender and Family Practices. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17250-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17250-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17249-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17250-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)