Abstract
The adoption of Industry 4.0 requires reconsideration of plant software architecture due to the strict layers of the automation pyramid hindering the implementation of central Industry 4.0 use cases like the changeable plant. Thus, plant software architecture has to change and, for example, adopt concepts such as the digital twin. In this chapter, we provide an overview of current challenges of the status quo of software architecture in Industry 4.0 and describe how they are solved by reference architectures. Furthermore, we provide guidance on how to classify use cases and reference architectures of Industry 4.0 according to various reference architecture models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A German board consisting of industry and research companies working to define the future concepts of Industry 4.0(see https://www.plattform-i40.de/IP/Navigation/EN/Home/home.html)
- 2.
https://www.basys40.de/ (German)
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
References
R. Drath, A. Horch, Industrie 4.0: Hit or hype?[industry forum]. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 8(2), 56–58 (2014)
W. Shen, D.H. Norrie, Agent-based systems for intelligent manufacturing: a state-of-the-art survey. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 1(2), 129–156 (1999)
Roser, Christoph: BWorld Robot Control Software. https://enwikipedia.org/wiki/File:Industry_4.0.png. Last Accessed 13 November 2021
International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 62264–1 Enterprise-control system integration–Part 1: Models and terminology (IEC, Genf, 2003)
Programmable Controllers—Part 3: Programming Languages, International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC, International Standard IEC61131-3, 2003
N. Bauer, R. Huuck, B. Lukoschus, S. Engell, A unifying semantics for sequential function charts, in Integration of software specification techniques for applications in engineering, (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004), pp. 400–418
V. Vyatkin, Software engineering in industrial automation: State-of-the-art review. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 9(3), 1234–1249 (2013)
Plattform Industrie 4.0, Anwendungsszenarien. https://www.plattform-i40.de/PI40/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/Publikation/fortschreibung-anwendungsszenarien.pdf. Last Accessed 13 November 2021
F. Schnicke, T. Kuhn, P.O. Antonino, Enabling industry 4.0 service-oriented architecture through digital twins, in European Conference on Software Architecture, (Springer, Cham, 2020)
J. Knodel, M. Naab, Pragmatic evaluation of software architectures, vol 1 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016)
ISO/IEC. Systems and software engineering – Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models. ISO, 2011
K. Zhou, T. Liu, L. Zhou, Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges, in 2015 12th International conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD), (IEEE, Zhangjiajie, 2015)
F. Schnicke et al., Architecture blueprint enabling distributed digital twins, in 7th Conference on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems, (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2021)
P.O. Antonino et al., Blueprints for architecture drivers and architecture solutions for Industry 4.0 shopfloor applications, in Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Software Architecture-Volume 2, ECSA ‘19, 261268, (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2019)
H. Koziolek et al., OpenPnP: a plug-and-produce architecture for the industrial internet of things, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP), (IEEE, Montreal, QC, 2019)
SPEC, DIN. 91345: 2016-04 Reference Architecture Model Industrie 4.0 (RAMI4. 0). DIN 4 (2016), 2016
Industry IoT Consortium, IIRA. https://www.iiconsortium.org/IIRA.htm. Last Accessed 13 November 2021
W. Kritzinger et al., Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(11), 1016–1022 (2018)
E. Glaessgen, D. Stargel, The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and U.S. air force vehicles, in Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (10.2514/6.2012-1818), 2012
C. Wagner et al., The role of the Industry 4.0 asset administration shell and the digital twin during the life cycle of a plant, in 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), (IEEE, Cyprus, 2017)
Plattform Industrie 4.0, Details of the Asset Administration Shell Part 1. https://www.plattform-i40.de/PI40/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Publikation/Details-of-the-Asset-Administration-Shell-Part1.html. Last Accessed 13 November 2021
Plattform Industrie 4.0, Details of the Asset Administration Shell Part 2. https://www.plattform-i40.de/IP/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/Publikation/Details_of_the_Asset_Administration_Shell_Part_2_V1.html. Last Accessed 13 November 2021
T. Kuhn, P.O. Antonino, F. Schnicke, Industrie 4.0 virtual automation bus architecture, in European Conference on Software Architecture, (Springer, Cham, 2020)
T. Lins et al., Industry 4.0 retrofitting, in 2018 VIII Brazilian Symposium on Computing Systems Engineering (SBESC), (IEEE, Salvador, 2018)
L. Kassner, C. Gröger, J. Königsberger, E. Hoos, C. Kie-fer, C. Weber, S. Silcher, B. Mitschang, The Stuttgart IT architecture for manufacturing. An architecture for the data-driven factory, in Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS) 2016. Revised selected papers, (Springer, Cham, 2017)
P. Leitão et al., Instantiating the PERFORM system architecture for industrial case studies, in International workshop on service orientation in holonic and multi-agent manufacturing, (Springer, Cham, 2016)
N. Chakravorti et al., Validation of PERFoRM reference architecture demonstrating an automatic robot reconfiguration application, in 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), (IEEE, Emden, 2017)
N. Chakravorti et al., Validation of PERFoRM reference architecture demonstrating an application of data mining for predicting machine failure. Procedia CIRP 72, 1339–1344 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schnicke, F., Kuhn, T. (2023). Reference Architectures for Industry 4.0. In: Nakagawa, E.Y., Oliveira Antonino, P. (eds) Reference Architectures for Critical Domains . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16957-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16957-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16956-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16957-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)