Abstract
In order to understand and improve the collaborative ideation process, it is essential to understand process losses. Process losses are better researched than process gains, as researchers have thought to explain why group ideation in academic research has proven to be less effective than nominal ideation (Gallupe et al., 1991). There have been proposals for eliminating or containing process losses, for example, through electronic ideation. Process losses stem from the individual, team-level, and organisational traits that decrease the team’s ability to conduct an effective creative process to lower than the nominal creativity of the assembled team members (Mullen et al., 1991; Stroebe & Diehl, 1994). Recognising the process losses and gains that occur during the creative process, especially during shared idea production, is important to limit losses and boost gains. Limiting both would likely be helped by understanding the underlying causes of both gains and losses, while some process losses are well known, such as groupthink.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The Role of Social Anxiousness in Group Brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071
Catmull, E., & Wallace, A. (2014). Creativity, Inc.: Overcoming the Unseen Forces That Stand in the Way of True Inspiration. Bantam Press.
Cooper, W. H., Gallupe, R. B., Pollard, S., & Cadsby, J. (1998). Some Liberating Effects of Anonymous Electronic Brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498292001
Dennis, A., & Williams, M. (2003). Electronic Brainstorming: Theory, Research, and Future Direction. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group Creativity (1st ed., pp. 160–180). Oxford University Press.
Dennis, A. R., Aronson, J. E., Heninger, W. G., & Walker, E. D. (1999). Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/249411
Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer Brainstorms: More Heads Are Better Than One. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.531
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.53.3.497
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity Loss in Idea-Generating Groups: Tracking Down the Blocking Effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.392
Diener, E. (1979). Deindividuation, Self-awareness, and Disinhibition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(7), 1160–1171. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1160
Esser, J. K., & Lindoerfer, J. S. (1989). Groupthink and the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident: Toward a Quantitative Case Analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2(3), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960020304
Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Gallupe, R. B., Bastianutti, L. M., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking Brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.76.1.137
Gallupe, R. B., Cooper, W. H., Grisé, M.-L., & Bastianutti, L. M. (1994). Blocking Electronic Brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.77
Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 350–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/256377
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Houghton Mifflin.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social Loafing: A Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.65.4.681
Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06
Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus Individual Performance on Tasks Requiring Ideational Proficiency (Brainstorming): A Review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420030402
Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). Social Comparison Goal Setting in Brainstorming Groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(18), 1579–1596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02634.x
Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group Preference and Convergent Tendencies in Small Groups: A Content Analysis of Group Brainstorming Performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1203_2
Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822
Li, Z. (Michael). (2021). Creativity and Opportunity: How COVID-19 Fosters Digital Dance Education. Digital Creativity, 32(3), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2021.1967406
Moorhead, G., Ference, R., & Neck, C. P. (1991). Group Decision Fiascoes Continue: Space Shuttle Challenger and a Revised Groupthink Framework. Human Relations, 44(6), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679104400601
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The Group as a Polarizer of Attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027568
Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: A Meta-Analytic Integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1201_1
Nijstad, B., Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (2003). Cognitive Stimulation and Interference in Idea-Generating Groups. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group Creativity (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied Imagination. Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social Influence Processes in Group Brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.4.575
Pinsonneault, A., Barki, H., Gallupe, R. B., & Hoppen, N. (1999). Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity. Information Systems Research, 10(2), 110–133. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.2.110
Schwenk, C., & Valacich, J. (1994). Effects of Devil’s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Individuals versus Groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(2), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1057
Straus, S. G. (1996). Getting a Clue: The Effects of Communication Media and Information Distribution on Participation and Performance in Computer-Mediated and Face-To-Face Groups. Small Group Research, 27(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496271006
Stroebe, W., & Diehl, M. (1994). Why Groups Are Less Effective Than Their Members: On Productivity Losses in Idea-generating Groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000084
Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does Group Participation When Using Brainstorming Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390603
Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57(3), 448–467. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1024
Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social Loafing and Social Compensation: The Effects of Expectations of Co-worker Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.570
Woodman, R., Sawyer, J., & Griffin, R. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517
Ziegler, R., Diehl, M., & Zijlstra, G. (2000). Idea Production in Nominal and Virtual Groups: Does Computer-Mediated Communication Improve Group Brainstorming? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200032003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Folk, L.S. (2022). Understanding the Team Process Loss Factors Impacting Creativity. In: The Hidden Barriers and Enablers of Team-Based Ideation. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16795-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16795-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16794-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16795-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)