Skip to main content

Masked Belles and Beasts: Uncovering Toys as Extensions, Avatars and Activists in Human Identity Play

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Masks and Human Connections
  • 169 Accesses

Abstract

Adult toy play is often disguised under euphemisms such as hobbying, collecting, or “dolling” (Heljakka, 2018). Whereas these terms describe toy use as a leisure pursuit interested in engagement with playful objects, they fail to grasp the psychological and philosophical depth of mature players’ interaction with toys with a face, or so-called character toys—dolls, action figures and soft toys (Heljakka, Principles of adult play(fulness) in contemporary toy cultures: From Wow to Flow to Glow. Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University, 2013). The chapter at hand addresses these toys from the theoretical perspectives of adult toy play with a particular focus on play with identities. Previous research suggests how adults use toys in complex ways not only to escape the burdens of everyday life and to enter the sphere of fantasy, but also to connect with real world phenomena and to explore their own identities. Photoplay (or, toy photography, see e.g., Heljakka, Aren’t You a Doll. Toying with Avatars in Digital Playgrounds. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 4(2), 153–170, 2012), a popular material, digital and socially shared play pattern unmasks the potential of toys as the belles and beasts as part their players’ identities through visual storytelling. As demonstrated in the chapter, a review of studies (interviews, analyses of photoplay, and participatory observation of in-situ toy play) conducted with adult toy players during the past decennium reveals how toys come to function as extensions, avatars, and activists in human identity play, making adult aspirations and actions to explore the human condition visible. The chapter concludes with the observation that in times, in which uses of media technology and online sharing blur the lines between reality and artificiality, toys as masks incorporate powerful potential and agency in uncovering aspects of their players true identities, embodying, mirroring, as well as unmasking the human—and humanity—behind the toys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more on the concept of the magic circle, see Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element of Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  2. 2.

    However, toys have been using face masks during the COVID19 pandemic. For reference, see the figures depicting photoplay in Heljakka (2020, 2021).

References

  • Baptiste, D. A., Jr. (1989). Using Masks as Therapeutic Aids in Family Therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 11(1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(Sep.), 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. W. (2008). Toward a Definition of “Virtual Worlds”. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v1i1.283

  • Berg, D. (1986, Summer). Transformers, Barbie Dolls and the Cabbage Patch Kids: Toys, Technology and Human Identity. Et Cetera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, D. (1989). Creativity Across the Life Span. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, Guest editors, S. D. Wright & C. A. Wright, Vol. XVI, Nos. 3 & 4, Autumn & Winter 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, D. (2015). Psychological approaches to the study of play. American Journal of Play, 7(2), 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2009). Play: How it Shapes the Brain, Opens the Imagination, and Invigorates the Soul. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. (2005). The Genesis of Animal Play: Testing the Limits. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, R. (1994). Manufactured Pleasures. Psychological responses to design. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberle, S. G. (2009). Classic Toys of the National Toy Hall of Fame: A Celebration of the Greatest Toys of All Time! Strong National Museum of Play. Running Press Book Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • F.A.O. Schwartz. (1975). Toys Through the Years. Doubleday & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortes, M. (1973). On the Concept of the Person among the Tallensi. In G. Dieterlen (Ed.), La notion de personne en Afrique noire. Editions du CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1964). Notes on the Concepts of Play and Leisure. The Sociological Review, 12(1), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. (2015). Studying play without calling it that. In J. Johnson, S. Eberle, T. Henricks, & D. Kuschner (Eds.), The Handbook of the Study of Play. (pp. 121–138). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heljakka, K. (2012). Aren’t You a Doll. Toying with Avatars in Digital Playgrounds. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 4(2), 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heljakka, K. (2013). Principles of adult play(fulness) in contemporary toy cultures: From Wow to Flow to Glow. Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heljakka, K. (2014). Masked Belle. La Serenissima Series. A Series of Photoplay (Toy Photography).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heljakka, K. (2017). Toy Fandom, Adulthood, and the Ludic Age: Creative Material Culture as Play. In J. Gray, C. Sandvoss, & C. L. Harrington (Eds.), Fandom, Second Edition. Identities and Communities in a Mediated World (pp. 91–105). New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heljakka, K. (2018). More than Collectors. Exploring Theorists’, Hobbyists’ and Everyday Players’ Rhetoric in Adult Play with Character Toys. Games and Culture, First Online September 30, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heljakka, K. (2020, May 11). Pandemic Toy Play against Social Distancing: Teddy Bears, Window-Screens and Playing for the Common Good in Times of Self-isolation. Wider Screen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heljakka, K. (2021). Liberated through Teddy Bears: Resistance, Resourcefulness, and Resilience in Toy Play during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Play. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2021.2005402

  • Heljakka, K., & Harviainen, J. T. (2019). From Displays and Dioramas to Doll Dramas: Adult World Building and World Playing with Toys. American Journal of Play, 11(3), 351–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heljakka, K., & Räikkönen, J. (2021, April). Puzzling Out “Toyrism”: Conceptualizing Value Co-creation in Toy Tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100791

  • Henricks, T. S. (2015a). Play as Self-Realization—Toward a General Theory of Play. In J. Johnson, S. Eberle, T. Henricks, & D. Kuschner (Eds.), The Handbook of the Study of Play (pp. 1–24). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henricks, T. S. (2015b). Where Are We Now. Challenges for the Study of Play. In J. Johnson, S. Eberle, T. Henricks, & D. Kuschner (Eds.), The Handbook of the Study of Play (pp. 381–391). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henricks, T. S. (2017). Introduction in Sutton-Smith, Brian (2017). Play for Life. Play Theory and Play as Emotional Survival. Compiled and edited by Charles Lamar Phillips and the editors of the American Journal of Play, The Strong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibister, K. (2016). How Games Move Us: Emotion by Design. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ike, J. D., Bayerle, H., Logan, R. A., & Parker, R. M. (2020). Face Masks: Their History and the Values They Communicate. Journal of Health Communication, 25(12), 990–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E., Eberle, S. G., Henricks, T. S., & Kuschner, D. (Eds.), (2015). The Handbook of the Study of Play. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2002). Killing Monsters. Why Children Need Fantasy, Super Heroes, and Make-Believe Violence. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, H. (2002). Lara Croft: Feminist Icon or Cyberbimbo? on the Limits of Textual Analysis. Game Studies. The International Journal of Game Research, 2(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S. (1993). Out of the Garden: Toys and Children’s Culture in the Age of TV Marketing. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, S. (2013). Playing in a Deleuzian playground. In E. Ryall, W. Russell & M. MacLean (Eds.), The Philosophy of play (pp. 144–154). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1996). Etiikka ja äärettömyys. Keskusteluja Philippe Nemon kanssa. [Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo] (finnish transl. A. Pönni), Gaudeamus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinovitz, A. (2017). Towards a Theory of Toys and Toy-Play. Humanistic Studies, 40, 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-016-9418-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, R., & O’Connor, S. (2017). Playfulness in Adults: An Examination of Play and Playfulness and Their Implications for Coaching. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 10(1), 54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massie, P. (2018). Masks and the Space of Play. Research in Phenomenology, 48(1), 119–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meriläinen, M., Stenros, J., & Heljakka, K. (2022). The Pile of Shame: The Personal and Social Sustainability of Collecting and Hoarding Miniatures. In S. S. Muthu (Ed.), Toys and Sustainability. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9673-2_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen, F. (1999). Do children REALLY need all these toys? – do adults?. In L-E. Berg, A. Nelson, & K. Svensson (Eds.), Toys in educational and socio-cultural context. Toy research in the late twentieth century. Part 2. Selection of papers presented at the International Toy Research Conference, Halmstad University, Sweden June, 1996, 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, K., Keltner, D., & Jenkins, J. M. (Eds.), (2006). Understanding Emotions (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, D. (1995). Masks and the Semiotics of Identity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 1995, 581–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retter, H. (1999). Postmodernity—What about Toys? In L.-E. Berg, A. Nelson, K. Svensson (Eds.), Toys in Educational and Socio-cultural Context. Toy Research in the Late Twentieth Century. Part 2. Selection of papers presented at the International Toy Research Conference, Halmstad University, Sweden, June 1996, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, O. (1955). Masks and Magic. Thomas Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossie, J.-P. (2005). Toys, Play, Culture and Society. Anthropological Approach with Reference to North Africa and the Sahara. SITREC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, K. H., Fein, G. G., & Vandenberg, B. (1983). Play. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Formerly Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 693–774). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalleck, J. (1973). Masks. Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (1986). Foreword. In H. Boehm (Ed.), The Right Toys. A Guide to Selecting the Best Toys for Children. A Bantam, Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (1993). Suggested Rhetorics in Adult Play Theories. Play Theory & Research, 1(2), 102–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The Ambiguity of Play. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (2008). Beyond Ambiguity. In F. Brown & C. Taylor (Eds.), Foundations of Playwork. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (2017). Play for Life. Play Theory and Play as Emotional Survival. Compiled and edited by Charles Lamar Phillips and the editors of the American Journal of Play, The Strong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomshine, J. C. (2010). Aeryn’s Dolls. In F. Lunning (Ed.), Fanthropologies, vol. 5 (pp. 334–339). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Together Alone. Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, P. (2010, August). Why Do We Have to Grow Up? The World of Childhood is a Model of a Greater World. Playthings, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L. (2003). Interactivity or Interpassivity: A Question of Agency in Digital Play. http://hypertext.mit.edu.ua/dac/papers/Wilson.pdf

  • Zaslow, E. (2017). Situating American Girl: Tools of Socialization in a Changing Culture. In Playing with America’s Doll. A Cultural Analysis of the American Girl Collection (pp. 35–70). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katriina Heljakka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heljakka, K. (2023). Masked Belles and Beasts: Uncovering Toys as Extensions, Avatars and Activists in Human Identity Play. In: Magalhães, L., Martins, C.O. (eds) Masks and Human Connections. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16673-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics