Abstract
With surveillance practices growing in a quotidian basis, civic resistance to it now constitutes an important part of people’s daily lives. As technologies of surveillance and its tactics shift every day, most people, not only in southern Africa but also in many countries in the world over, have to be participants in a multitude of rituals that serve the purpose of resisting surveillance. These include legal avenues of resistance and technology-based approaches. In this chapter, which is largely based on interviews with CSOs’ activists, we examine emerging forms of resistance to surveillance in the southern African region. The chapter is organized as follows. In the first section, we find the logic of resistance to surveillance. In the second section, we examine how civic societies and other vulnerable constituencies coalesce and mobilize against mass and unregulated surveillance practices. This is followed by a section that explores the everyday forms of surveillance resistance in parts of the region. We follow this section with a closer look at the South African case to reveal how litigation has been successfully used to fend off encroaching non-transparent surveillance practices. We demonstrate that litigation often works in contexts where the judiciary is relatively free of political interference. In the next section, we demonstrate that in (semi) authoritarian contexts, fraught with judicial capture and court packing practices, litigation is not on the menu of options available to actors involved in resisting surveillance. We conclude the chapter by assessing existing possibilities of surveillance resistance and the challenges to surveillance resistance in the region.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In 2017, the ANC lashed at CASAC for behaving like a political outfit: https://www.news24.com/News24/corruption-watch-and-casac-call-for-political-party-candidate-lists-to-be-reviewed-20190401.
References
Alexander (2021). What Is Court Packing? Rutgers Today. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from https://www.rutgers.edu/news/what-court-packing
Bitar, K. (2014). Global Information Society Watch 2014: Communications Surveillance in the Digital Age, Global Information Society Watch 2014. Melville: Association For Progressive Communications. https://giswatch.org/sites/default/files/circumventing_surveillance_of_internet_communications.pdf
Chifamba, M. (2020). Zimbabwe: Mnangagwa’s Capture of Judiciary a Red Flag for State Failure. The African Report. Retrieved February 9, 2021, from https://www.theafricareport.com/51602/zimbabwe-mnangagwas-capture-of-judiciary-a-red-flag-for-state-failure/
Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R., 2009. Promoting accountability in multilevel governance: a network approach. European law journal, 13(4), 542–562.
Helles, R., & Flyverbom, M. (2019). Meshes of Surveillance, Prediction, and Infrastructure: On the Cultural and Commercial Consequences of Digital Platforms. Surveillance & Society, 17(1/2), 34–39.
Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2018). Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society. John Wiley & Sons.
Jasser, G. (2021). Gab as an imitated counterpublic. In Bessant, J., Devries, M. and Watts, R. eds., 2021. Rise of the Far Right: Technologies of Recruitment and Mobilization. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 193–222.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 89–101.
Lyon, D. (2013). Everyday surveillance: Personal data and social classifications. In Questioning Crime and Criminology In Peelo, M.T. and Soothill, K. eds., 2005. Questioning crime and criminology. London: Routledge. (pp.135–149).
Mare, A., & Duncan, J. (2015). An Analysis of the Communications Surveillance Legislative Framework in South Africa. Media Policy and Democracy Project. www.Media and democracy.com/uploads/1/6/5/7/16577624/comms-surveillance-framework_mare2.pdf
Martin, A. K., Van Brakel, R. E., & Bernhard, D. J. (2009). Understanding Resistance to Digital Surveillance: Towards a Multi-disciplinary, Multi-actor Framework. Surveillance & Society, 6(3), 213–232.
Marx, G.T. 2003. What’s New About the” New Surveillance”? Classifying for Change and Continuity. Surveillance & Society, 1(1), 9–29.
Marx, G.T., 2013. Some conceptual issues in the study of borders and surveillance. In Zureik, E. and Salter, M. eds., 2013. Global surveillance and policing. Toronto: Routledge; pp23–47.
Marx, K. (1974). On Freedom of the Press and Censorship. McGraw-Hill.
Misselbrook, D. 2016. Foucault. British Journal of General Practice, 63(611), 312–321.
Munoriyarwa, A., & Chiumbu, S. (2022). Powers, Interests and Actors: The Influence of China in Africa’s Digital Surveillance Practices. In A. K. Farooq (Ed.), Digital Dissidence and Social Media Censorship in Africa. Routledge.
Murphy, M. H. (2016). Technological Solutions to Privacy Questions: What Is the Role of Law? Information & Communications Technology Law, 25(1), 4–31.
Nicas, J., Isaac, M., & Frenkel, S. (2021). Millions Flock to Telegram and Signal as Fears Grow over Big Tech. New York Times, pp. 01–14.
Rossdale, C. (2016). Activism, resistance and security. In B., Jonna, N. and Anthony, B., 2016. Ethical Security Studies: A New Research Agenda. Berlin: Routledge.
Roussi, A. (2020). Resisting the Rise of Facial Recognition. Nature, 587(7834), 350–354.
Schedler, A. (2002). Elections Without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36–50.
The Guardian. (2021). The Guardian View on Spyware Sales: The Proliferation Risks Are Real. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jul/19/the-guardian-view-on-spyware-sales-the-proliferation-risks-are-real
Troco, A. A. (2021). Angola: Old Authoritarian Practices Remain. Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://www.wits.ac.za/news/latest-news/opinion/2021/2021-09/angola-old-authoritarian-practices-remain.html
Weimann, G. (2016). Going Dark: Terrorism on the Dark Web. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(3), 195–206.
Wetzling, T., & Vieth, K. (2018). Upping the Ante on Bulk Surveillance: An International Compendium of Good Legal Safeguards and Oversight Innovations (Vol. 50). Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Munoriyarwa, A., Mare, A. (2022). Quotidian Forms of Resistance to Surveillance. In: Digital Surveillance in Southern Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16636-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16636-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16635-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16636-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)