Skip to main content

Digital Transportation Maturity Measurement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems in Digital Transformation

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 549))

  • 842 Accesses

Abstract

From the past to the present, there are radical changes and developments available in technology. Therefore, following these technological developments become essential for companies and organizations for coping with competitors. Transportation is a system that is in every business and can be used in various fields, and therefore, digitalization in transportation can be very essential for companies to adapt to Industry 4.0. In this study, a novel maturity model is proposed with the help of the literature and the experiences of experts. Within the scope of the proposed maturity model, five main criteria (material flow, business culture, organization & strategy, customer satisfaction & marketing, smart logistics) are proposed. In addition, the proposed model is solved by a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach called hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (HFAHP). In the HFAHP method, uncertainties, which is the nature of this problem, are handled with fuzzy logic. Finally, a real-life case study is applied to the proposed model and methodology in a logistic company in Turkey. The results of this study show that the company needs to improve its capabilities for the digitalization of its transportation system, especially for customer satisfaction & marketing and organization & strategy criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. PwC and GMIS: Industry 4.0: Building the digital industrial enterprise (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asadamraji E, Rajabzadeh GHatari A, Shoar M (2021) A maturity model for digital transformation in transportation activities. Int J Transp Eng 9(1):415–438

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asdecker B, ve Felch V (2018) Development of an industry 4.0 maturity model for the delivery process in supply chains. J Model Manag 13(4):840–883

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bigliardi B, Filippelli S, Petroni A, Tagliente L (2022) The digitalization of supply chain: a review. Procedia Comput Sci 200:1806–1815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.381. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050922003908. 3rd International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing

  5. Caiado RGG, Scavarda LF, Gavião LO, Ivson P, De Mattos Nascimento DL, Garza-Reyes JA (2021) A fuzzy rule-based industry 4.0 maturity model for operations and supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 231:107883

    Google Scholar 

  6. Facchini F, Oleśków-Szłapka J, Ranieri L, Urbinati A (2019) A maturity model for logistics 4.0: an empirical analysis and a roadmap for future research. Sustainability 12(1):86

    Google Scholar 

  7. Filev D, Yager RR (1998) On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets Syst 94(2):157–169

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Han L, Hou H, Bi ZM, Yang J, Zheng X (2021) Functional requirements and supply chain digitalization in industry 4.0. Inf Syst Front. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10173-1

  9. Henke M, Besenfelder C, Kaczmarek S, Fiolka M (2020) A vision of digitalization in supply chain management and logistics, pp 277–286. https://doi.org/10.15488/9669

  10. Klimko G (2001) Knowledge management and maturity models: building common understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Knowledge Management, vol 2, pp 269–278. Bled, Slovenia

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krowas K, Riedel R (2019) Planning guideline and maturity model for intra-logistics 4.0 in SME. In: Ameri F, Stecke KE, von Cieminski G, Kiritsis D (eds) APMS 2019, vol 567. IAICT. Springer, Cham, pp 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29996-5_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuhlmann AS, Klumpp M (2017) Digitalization of logistics processes and the human perspective

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kusters A (2022) Relating digitization, digitalization and digital transformation: a maturity model and roadmap for dutch logistics companies. B.S. thesis, University of Twente

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lichtblau K et al (2015) Impuls, industry 4.0 readiness. Impuls-Stiftung des VDMA, Aachen-Kölb

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lichtblau K et al (2015) Impuls industry 4.0 readiness. Industrie 4.0 Readiness Study

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu H, Rodríguez RM (2014) A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making. Inf Sci 258:220–238

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Nayyar A, Kumar A (2020) A roadmap to industry 4.0: smart production, sharp business and sustainable development. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14544-6

  18. Oleśków-Szłapka J, Stachowiak A (2019) The framework of logistics 4.0 maturity model. In: Burduk A, Chlebus E, Nowakowski T, Tubis A (eds) ISPEM 2018, vol 835. AISC. Springer, Cham, pp 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97490-3_73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Öztaysi B, Onar SÇ, Boltürk E, Kahraman C (2015) Hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp 1–7. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paulk M, Curtis B, Chrissis M, Weber C (1993) Capability maturity model, version 1.1. Softw IEEE 10:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.219617

  21. Poor P, Ženíşek D, Basl J (2019) Historical overview of maintenance management strategies: development from breakdown maintenance to predictive maintenance in accordance with four industrial revolutions

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2011) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saaty TL (2001) Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. RWS publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schlüter F, Hetterscheid E (2017) Supply chain process oriented technology-framework for industry 4.0. In: T.R.C.M Kersten W, Blecker T (ed) Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), vol 23, pp 275–299. epubli GmbH, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.15480/882.1467. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/209313. Urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-88217645; 10419/209192; https://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/zbwhiclpr/23.htm

  25. Schuh G, Anderl R, Dumitrescu R, Krüger A, Ten Hompel M (2020) Using the industrie 4.0 maturity index in industry. Current challenges, case studies and trends

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schumacher A, Erol S, Sihn W (2016) A maturity model for assessing industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Cirp 52:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  27. Seyedghorban Z, Tahernejad H, Meriton R, Graham G (2020) Supply chain digitalization: past, present and future. Prod Plan Control 31(2–3):96–114

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sorkun M (2020) Digitalization in logistics operations and industry 4.0: understanding the linkages with buzzwords, pp 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29739-8_9

  29. Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(6):529–539

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp 1378–1382. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vinitha K, Ambrose Prabhu R, Bhaskar R, Hariharan R (2020) Review on industrial mathematics and materials at industry 1.0 to industry 4.0. Mater Today Proc 33:3956–3960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.331. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785320348045. International Conference on Nanotechnology: Ideas, Innovation and Industries

  32. Xu LD, Xu EL, Li L (2018) Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int J Prod Res 56(8):2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806

  33. Yu JJQ, Lam AYS (2018) Autonomous vehicle logistic system: joint routing and charging strategy. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 19(7):2175–2187. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2766682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zoubek M, Simon M (2021) Evaluation of the level and readiness of internal logistics for industry 4.0 in industrial companies. Appl Sci 11(13):6130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bilge Varol .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Varol, B., Er, G., Temur, G.T. (2023). Digital Transportation Maturity Measurement. In: Kahraman, C., Haktanır, E. (eds) Intelligent Systems in Digital Transformation. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 549. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16598-6_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics