Skip to main content

Abstract

With the use of technology in the livestock sector, it has been allowed an increase in animal production and reduction of waste with more precision. The use of these technological resources in the sector gave rise to Precision Cattle Raising, which makes use of information and communication technology to extract the best from animal production with more precision. Studies show the use of te-lemetry to measure the state of animal welfare. However, during transportation from the farm to the slaughterhouse there is no specific way to check animal wel-fare, this can affect meat quality and the livestock economic sector and animal production. This study aims to identify the variables that can be read through sen-sors or biomarkers for monitoring animal welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Machado, S.T., Santos, R.C.: O papel do bem-estar animal e as tendências de ambiência animal. In: dos Reis, J.G.M., de Oliveira Costa Neto, P.L. (eds.) Engenharia de produção aplicada ao agronegócio, pp. 263–290. Blucher, São Paulo (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broom, D.M.: Animal welfare: concepts and measurements. J. Anim. Sci. 69(10), 4167–4175 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dawkins, M.S.: Evolution and animal welfare. Q. Rev. Biol. 73(3), 305–328 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. International Office of Epizootics: Terrestrial animal health code (2021). OCLC: 1308956605. https://doc.woah.org/dyn/portal/index.xhtml?page=alo &aloId=41548 &req=103 &cid=a95aa508-fdf8-4dcb-b0c9-eecf3224ab68

  5. Broom, D.M.: Welfare concepts. In: Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, pp. 80–83. Elsevier (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.01321-2

  6. Farm animal welfare committee (FAWC). www.gov.uk/government/groups/farm-animal-welfare-committee-fawc

  7. Animal welfare committee (AWC). www.gov.uk/government/groups/animal-welfare-committee-awc

  8. da Fonseca, F.N., Abe, J.M., de Alencar Nääs, I., da Silva Cordeiro, A.F., do Amaral, F.V., Ungaro, H.C.: Automatic prediction of stress in piglets (Sus Scrofa) using infrared skin temperature. Comput. Electron. Agric. 168, 105148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105148

  9. da Silva, J.P., de Alencar Nääs, I., Abe, J.M., da Silva Cordeiro, A.F.: Classification of piglet (Sus Scrofa) stress conditions using vocalization pattern and applying paraconsistent logic Et. Comput. Electron. Agric. 166, 105020 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105020

  10. Peterson, E., Remmenga, M., Hagerman, A.D., Akkina, J.E.: Use of temperature, humidity, and slaughter condemnation data to predict increases in transport losses in three classes of swine and resulting foregone revenue. Front. Vet. Sci. 4, 67 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00067

  11. Neethirajan, S.: Transforming the adaptation physiology of farm animals through sensors. Animals 10, 1512 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091512

  12. Stephen, B., Michie, C., Andonovic, I.: Remote sensing in agricultural livestock welfare monitoring: practical considerations. In: Mukhopadhyay, S., Jiang, J.A. (eds.) Wireless Sensor Networks and Ecological Monitoring. Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 3, pp. 179–193. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36365-8_7

  13. Pandorfi, H., Almeida, G.L.P., Guiselini, C.: Precision animal production: basic principles and news in the swine production 13, 558–568. UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia. www.scielo.br/j/rbspa/a/zrsddbNQGp5mTkDLnRGmFLm/?lang=pt

  14. Sevegnani, K.B., Caror, I.W., Pandorfi, H., da Silva, I.J.O., de Moura, D.J.: Precision animal production: image analysis to study broiler’s behavior under stress conditions. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 9, 115–119 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662005000100017

  15. Pierce, F.J., Nowak, P.: Aspects of precision agriculture. Adv. Agron. 67, 1–85. Elsevier (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60513-1

  16. Esquirol-Caussa, J., Sanchez-Aldeguer, J., Santamaria, I.: A bibliographical review: the basis of our research. Physiotherapy Updates, 33–36 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pautasso, M.: Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003149 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149

  18. Silva, F.V., et al.: Welfare of lambs subjected to road transport and assessment of carcasses and meat. Pesquisa Vet. Bras. 37, 630–636 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2017000600017

  19. Thodberg, K., Foldager, L., Fogsgaard, K.K., Gaillard, C., Herskin, M.S.: Temperature conditions during commercial transportation of cull sows to slaughter. Comput. Electron. Agric. 192, 106626 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106626

  20. Lana, R.F., da Cunha, A.F., Lana, R.F., Santos, L.F., Araújo, F.R., da Silva, M.D.: Influence of feed withdrawal on mortality, body weight loss, fractures, bruises and contamination of carcasses in poultry slaughterhouse. Arch. Vet. Sci. 23, 24–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v23i1.44731

  21. Sousa, R.S., Nunes, E.D.S.C.L., Neto, M.S.D., Cardoso, G.V.F.: Occurrence of contusions in bovine carcasses in the state of Pará due to transport. Med. Vet. (Brazil) 15, 70–74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.26605/medvet-v15n1-2268

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonatas Santos de Souza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Souza, J.S., dos Reis, J.G.M. (2022). Technologies Used for Animal Welfare Monitoring. In: Kim, D.Y., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing and Logistics Systems: Turning Ideas into Action. APMS 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 664. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16411-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16411-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16410-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16411-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics