Skip to main content

A Dashboard to Support Teachers During Students’ Self-paced AI-Supported Problem-Solving Practice

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Educating for a New Future: Making Sense of Technology-Enhanced Learning Adoption (EC-TEL 2022)

Abstract

Past research has yielded ample knowledge regarding the design of analytics-based tools for teachers and has found beneficial effects of several tools on teaching and learning. Yet there is relatively little knowledge regarding the design of tools that support teachers when a class of students uses AI-based tutoring software for self-paced learning. To address this challenge, we conducted design-based research with 20 middle school teachers to create a novel real-time dashboard, Tutti, that helps a teacher monitor a class and decide which individual students to help, based on analytics from students’ tutoring software. Tutti is fully implemented and has been honed through prototyping and log replay sessions. A partial implementation was piloted in remote classrooms. Key design features are a two-screen design with (1) a class overview screen showing the status of each student as well as notifications of recent events, and (2) a deep dive screen to explore an individual student's work in detail, with both dynamic replay and an interactive annotated solution view. The project yields new insight into effective designs for a real-time analytics-based tool that may guide the design of other tools for K-12 teachers to support students in self-paced learning activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahn, J., Campos, F., Hays, M., Digiacomo, D.: Designing in context: reaching beyond usability in learning analytics dashboard design. J. Learn. Anal. 6, 70–85 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahuja, K., Kim, D., Xhakaj, F., Varga, V., Xie, A., et al.: EduSense: practical classroom sensing at scale. Proc. ACM Interact Mob. Wearable Ubiq. Technol. 3, 1–26 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Sewall, J., van Velsen, M., Popescu, O., et al.: Example-tracing tutors: intelligent tutor development for non-programmers. Int. J. Artif. Educ. 26, 224–269 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0088-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. An, P., Holstein K., d’Anjou B., Eggen B., Bakker S.: The TA framework: designing real-time teaching augmentation for K-12 classrooms. In: Proceeding 2020 CHI Conference, pp. 1–17. New York, ACM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B., Burleson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., et al.: A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. Int. J. Artif. Educ. 24, 387–426 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, R.S., Yacef, K.: The state of educational data mining in 2009: a review and future visions. J. Educ. Data Mining 1, 3–17 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. du Boulay, B.: Recent meta-reviews and meta–analyses of AIED systems. Int. J. Artif. Educ. 26, 536–537 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0060-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model User-adapt. Interact. 4, 253–278 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, A., et al.: Affective teacher tools: affective class report card and dashboard. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) AIED 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12748, pp. 178–189. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanington, B., Martin, B.: Universal methods of design expanded and revised. Rockport Publishers (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher–AI complementarity. J. Learn. Anal. 6, 27–52 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Designing for complementarity: teacher and student needs for orchestration support in AI-enhanced classrooms. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds.) AIED 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11625, pp. 157–171. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-enhanced classrooms. In: Rosé, C.P., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10947, pp. 154–168. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly, K., Heffernan, N., Heffernan, C., Goldman, S., Pellegrino, J., Goldstein, D.S.: Estimating the effect of web-based homework. In: Chad Lane, H., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 824–827. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_122

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Koedinger, K.R., Aleven, V.: Multimedia learning with cognitive tutors. In: Mayer, R., Fiorella, L. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 3rd edn., pp. 439–451. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Knoop-van Campen C.A.N., Wise A., Molenaar I.: The equalizing effect of teacher dashboards on feedback in K-12 classrooms. Interact. Learn. Env. 1–17 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nagashima, T., Yadav, G., Aleven, V.: A framework to guide educational technology studies in the evolving classroom research environment. In: De Laet, T., Klemke, R., Alario-Hoyos, C., Hilliger, I., Ortega-Arranz, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2021. LNCS, vol. 12884, pp. 207–220. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Olsen, J.K., Rummel, N., Aleven, V.: Designing for the co-orchestration of social transitions between individual, small-group and whole-class learning in the classroom. Int. J. Artif. Educ. 31, 24–56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00228-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pane, J.F., Griffin, B.A., McCaffrey, D.F., Karam, R.: Effectiveness of cognitive tutor algebra I at scale. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 36, 127–144 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ritter, S., Anderson, J.R., Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.: Cognitive tutor: applied research in mathematics education. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 249–255 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ritter S., Yudelson M., Fancsali S.E., Berman S.R.: How mastery learning works at scale. In: Proceeding 2016 ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, pp. 71–9, New York ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. VanLehn, K.: The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educ. Psychol. 46, 197–221 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, S., Christensen, C., Cui, W., Tong, R., Yarnall, L., et al.: When adaptive learning is effective learning: comparison of an adaptive learning system to teacher-led instruction. Interact. Learn. Env. 1-11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1808794

  24. Wood, H., Wood, D.: Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Comput. Educ. 33, 153–169 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xhakaj, F., Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M.: Effects of a teacher dashboard for an intelligent tutoring system on teacher knowledge, lesson planning, lessons and student learning. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10474, pp. 315–329. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J.: Speed dating: providing a menu of possible futures. She Ji J. Des. Econ. Innov. 3, 30–50 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by US Dept. of Education (IES) grant R305A180301 and NSF (IIS) grant 1822861 We gratefully acknowledge their contributions. Opinions expressed in the paper are those of the authors, not the sponsor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Aleven .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aleven, V., Blankestijn, J., Lawrence, L., Nagashima, T., Taatgen, N. (2022). A Dashboard to Support Teachers During Students’ Self-paced AI-Supported Problem-Solving Practice. In: Hilliger, I., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., De Laet, T., Ortega-Arranz, A., Farrell, T. (eds) Educating for a New Future: Making Sense of Technology-Enhanced Learning Adoption. EC-TEL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16289-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16290-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics