Abstract
Past research has yielded ample knowledge regarding the design of analytics-based tools for teachers and has found beneficial effects of several tools on teaching and learning. Yet there is relatively little knowledge regarding the design of tools that support teachers when a class of students uses AI-based tutoring software for self-paced learning. To address this challenge, we conducted design-based research with 20 middle school teachers to create a novel real-time dashboard, Tutti, that helps a teacher monitor a class and decide which individual students to help, based on analytics from students’ tutoring software. Tutti is fully implemented and has been honed through prototyping and log replay sessions. A partial implementation was piloted in remote classrooms. Key design features are a two-screen design with (1) a class overview screen showing the status of each student as well as notifications of recent events, and (2) a deep dive screen to explore an individual student's work in detail, with both dynamic replay and an interactive annotated solution view. The project yields new insight into effective designs for a real-time analytics-based tool that may guide the design of other tools for K-12 teachers to support students in self-paced learning activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahn, J., Campos, F., Hays, M., Digiacomo, D.: Designing in context: reaching beyond usability in learning analytics dashboard design. J. Learn. Anal. 6, 70–85 (2019)
Ahuja, K., Kim, D., Xhakaj, F., Varga, V., Xie, A., et al.: EduSense: practical classroom sensing at scale. Proc. ACM Interact Mob. Wearable Ubiq. Technol. 3, 1–26 (2019)
Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Sewall, J., van Velsen, M., Popescu, O., et al.: Example-tracing tutors: intelligent tutor development for non-programmers. Int. J. Artif. Educ. 26, 224–269 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0088-2
An, P., Holstein K., d’Anjou B., Eggen B., Bakker S.: The TA framework: designing real-time teaching augmentation for K-12 classrooms. In: Proceeding 2020 CHI Conference, pp. 1–17. New York, ACM (2020)
Arroyo, I., Woolf, B., Burleson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., et al.: A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. Int. J. Artif. Educ. 24, 387–426 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y
Baker, R.S., Yacef, K.: The state of educational data mining in 2009: a review and future visions. J. Educ. Data Mining 1, 3–17 (2009)
du Boulay, B.: Recent meta-reviews and meta–analyses of AIED systems. Int. J. Artif. Educ. 26, 536–537 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0060-1
Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model User-adapt. Interact. 4, 253–278 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821
Gupta, A., et al.: Affective teacher tools: affective class report card and dashboard. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) AIED 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12748, pp. 178–189. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_15
Hanington, B., Martin, B.: Universal methods of design expanded and revised. Rockport Publishers (2019)
Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher–AI complementarity. J. Learn. Anal. 6, 27–52 (2019)
Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Designing for complementarity: teacher and student needs for orchestration support in AI-enhanced classrooms. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds.) AIED 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11625, pp. 157–171. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_14
Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-enhanced classrooms. In: Rosé, C.P., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10947, pp. 154–168. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_12
Kelly, K., Heffernan, N., Heffernan, C., Goldman, S., Pellegrino, J., Goldstein, D.S.: Estimating the effect of web-based homework. In: Chad Lane, H., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 824–827. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_122
Koedinger, K.R., Aleven, V.: Multimedia learning with cognitive tutors. In: Mayer, R., Fiorella, L. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 3rd edn., pp. 439–451. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2022)
Knoop-van Campen C.A.N., Wise A., Molenaar I.: The equalizing effect of teacher dashboards on feedback in K-12 classrooms. Interact. Learn. Env. 1–17 (2021)
Nagashima, T., Yadav, G., Aleven, V.: A framework to guide educational technology studies in the evolving classroom research environment. In: De Laet, T., Klemke, R., Alario-Hoyos, C., Hilliger, I., Ortega-Arranz, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2021. LNCS, vol. 12884, pp. 207–220. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_16
Olsen, J.K., Rummel, N., Aleven, V.: Designing for the co-orchestration of social transitions between individual, small-group and whole-class learning in the classroom. Int. J. Artif. Educ. 31, 24–56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00228-w
Pane, J.F., Griffin, B.A., McCaffrey, D.F., Karam, R.: Effectiveness of cognitive tutor algebra I at scale. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 36, 127–144 (2014)
Ritter, S., Anderson, J.R., Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.: Cognitive tutor: applied research in mathematics education. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 249–255 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194060
Ritter S., Yudelson M., Fancsali S.E., Berman S.R.: How mastery learning works at scale. In: Proceeding 2016 ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, pp. 71–9, New York ACM (2016)
VanLehn, K.: The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educ. Psychol. 46, 197–221 (2011)
Wang, S., Christensen, C., Cui, W., Tong, R., Yarnall, L., et al.: When adaptive learning is effective learning: comparison of an adaptive learning system to teacher-led instruction. Interact. Learn. Env. 1-11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1808794
Wood, H., Wood, D.: Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Comput. Educ. 33, 153–169 (1999)
Xhakaj, F., Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M.: Effects of a teacher dashboard for an intelligent tutoring system on teacher knowledge, lesson planning, lessons and student learning. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10474, pp. 315–329. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_23
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J.: Speed dating: providing a menu of possible futures. She Ji J. Des. Econ. Innov. 3, 30–50 (2017)
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by US Dept. of Education (IES) grant R305A180301 and NSF (IIS) grant 1822861 We gratefully acknowledge their contributions. Opinions expressed in the paper are those of the authors, not the sponsor.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aleven, V., Blankestijn, J., Lawrence, L., Nagashima, T., Taatgen, N. (2022). A Dashboard to Support Teachers During Students’ Self-paced AI-Supported Problem-Solving Practice. In: Hilliger, I., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., De Laet, T., Ortega-Arranz, A., Farrell, T. (eds) Educating for a New Future: Making Sense of Technology-Enhanced Learning Adoption. EC-TEL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16289-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16290-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)