Abstract
This chapter highlights the dominant representation of Muslim women as voiceless in the Western media and introduces how such stereotypical representation of Muslim women may be part of their representation as speakers of English. It presents the 2016 language ideological debate that heavily problematises Muslim women as speakers of English. The chapter highlights the contestation of this representation by Muslim women in the UK that warrants proper investigation of the 2016 language ideological debate in the UK. A brief overview of the methods of data collection, analysis, and treatment is then given. Finally, an outline of the book is provided.
Keywords
- Language ideological debate
- Stereotypes
- Politicisation
- Critical discourse analysis (CDA)
- Media representation
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ahlulbayt TV (Producer). (2016). Are Muslim women “traditionally submissive”? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7ouz8OB93Y
Allen, C. (2012). A review of the evidence relating to the representation of Muslims and Islam in the British media. https://issuu.com/drchrisallen/docs/chrisallen-appg_muslims-media_evidence-october2012
Allen, C. (2015). People hate you because of the way you dress: Understanding the invisible experiences of veiled British Muslim women victims of islamophobia. International review of victimology, 21(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758015591677
BBC Trending. (2016). ‘Traditionally submissive Muslim women’ say who us? https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-35403106
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2014). Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in critical discourse analysis and beyond. Discourse & Society, 25(2), 135–158.
Bibi, R. (2019). Challenging discourses on BSA Muslim women through an intersectional analysis of everyday experiences across spaces of home, work and public space. Doctor of Philosophy. The University of Manchester.
Blackledge, A. (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world. John Benjamins Publishing.
Blackledge, A. (2006b). The racialization of language in British political discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 3(1), 61–79.
Bleich, E., Stonebraker, H., Nisar, H., & Abdelhamid, R. (2015). Media portrayals of minorities: Muslims in British newspaper headlines, 2001–2012. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.1002200
Brah, A. (1993). ‘Race’ and ‘culture’ in the gendering of labour markets: South Asian young Muslim women and the labour market. New Community, 19(3), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.1993.9976376
Brown, K. (2006). Realising Muslim women’s rights: The role of Islamic identity among British Muslim women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2006.05.002
Bullock, K. H., & Jafri, G. J. (2000). Media (mis) representations: Muslim women in the Canadian nation. Canadian Woman Studies, 20(2), 35–40.
Cameron, D. (2016). We won’t let women be second class citizens. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/we-wont-let-women-be-second-class-citizens-brh07l6jttb
Dwyer, C. (1999a). Contradictions of community: Questions of identity for young British Muslim women. Sage, 31(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1068/a310053
Dwyer, C. (1999b). Veiled meanings: Young British Muslim women and the negotiation of differences. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 6(1), 5–26.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. Pearson Education.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Psychology Press.
Fairclough, N. (2004). Semiotic aspects of social transformation and learning. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical policy studies, 7(2), 177–197.
Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Introduction to Discourse Studies (pp. 258–284). Sage.
Fairclough, N., Mulderring, J., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. Sage.
Hughes, L. (2016). More Muslim women should ‘learn English’ to help tackle extremism. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/12104556/David-Cameron-More-Muslim-women-should-learn-English-to-help-tackle-extremism.html
Jaspal, R., & Cinnirella, M. (2010). Media representations of British Muslims and hybridised threats to identity. Dynamics of Muslim Life, 4(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-010-0126-7
KhosraviNik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2012). Dynamics of representation in discourse: Immigrants in the British press. In M. Messer, R. Schroeder, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 283–295). Springer Vienna.
Macdonald, M. (2006). Muslim women and the veil: Problems of image and voice in media representations. Feminist Media Studies, 6(1), 7–23.
Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 14–31). Sage publications.
Moore, K., Mason, P., & Lewis, J. M. W. (2008). Images of Islam in the UK: The representation of British Muslims in the national print news media 2000–2008: Cardiff School of Journalism. Media and Cultural Studies.
Smith, M. (2017). How left or right-wing are the UK’s newspapers? https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2017/03/07/how-left-or-right-wing-are-uks-newspapers
Terman, R. (2017). Islamophobia and media portrayals of Muslim women: A computational text analysis of US news coverage. International Studies Quarterly, 61(3), 489–502.
van Dijk, T. A. (1989). Mediating racism: The role of the media in the reproduction of racism. In W. Ruth (Ed.), Language, power and ideology (pp. 199–226). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
van Dijk, T. A. (1992b). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society, 3(1), 87–118.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120). Sage Publications.
van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–70). Routledge.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.
van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118.
Wodak, R. (1999). Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 32(1–2), 185–193.
Wodak, R. (2001a). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). Sage Publications.
Wodak, R. (2001b). What CDA is about—A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In W. Ruth & M. Michael (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13). Sage publications.
Wodak, R., & Busch, B. (2004). Approaches to media texts. In J. D. H. Downing, D. McQuail, P. Schlesinger, & E. Wartella (Eds.), The sage handbook of media studies (pp. 105–123). Sage.
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., Liebhart, K., Hirsch, A., & Mitten, R. (2009). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–33). Sage Publications.
Zempi, I., & Chakraborti, N. (2015). They make us feel like we’re a virus’ : The multiple impacts of Islamophobic hostility towards veiled Muslim women. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 4(3), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v4i3.236
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neelam, M. (2022). Muslim Women and Language Ideological Debates. In: Muslim Women as Speakers of English. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16231-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16231-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16230-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16231-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)