Zusammenfassung
Ein letztes Bild der Wissenschaft als Kritik, das die Ontologie vor die Epistemologie stellt, wird dem mythischen Bild der Wissenschaft gegenübergestellt, das der soziale Konstruktivismus geschaffen hat. Der Wert des sozialen Konstruktivismus liegt in seiner kritischen Stoßrichtung und seiner Fähigkeit, Wissen und damit verbundene Behauptungen infrage zu stellen. Eines der Merkmale des mythischen Bildes der Wissenschaft ist jedoch das Erfordernis der Messung, um als Wissenschaft betrachtet zu werden, und es wird argumentiert, dass Quantifizierung und Messung nicht die definierenden Merkmale der Wissenschaft sein können. Das Kapitel wird mit drei Beispielen dafür abgeschlossen, was als Wissenschaft der Psychologie angesehen werden kann.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Ackroyd, S., & Fleetwood, S. (2000). Realism in contemporary organisation and management studies. In S. Ackroyd & S. Fleetwood (Hrsg.), Realist perspectives on management and organisations (S. 3–25). Routledge.
Anderson, J. (1962). Studies in empirical philosophy [A machine readable transcription]. http://adc.library.usyd.edu.au/view?docId=anderson/xml-main-texts/anderson049.xml. Zugegriffen am 14.08.2018.
Anderson, J. (2005). Space-time and the proposition: The 1944 lectures on Samuel Alexander’s space, time and deity. Sydney University Press.
Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. Macmillan.
Chiumbu, S. (2016). Media, race and capital: A decolonial analysis of representation of miners’ strikes in South Africa. African Studies, 75(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2016.1193377
Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573–588. http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=494070. Zugegriffen am 14.08.2018.
Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975–990. http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=496431. Zugegriffen am 14.08.2018.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin.
Cresswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting: Mixed methods research. Sage.
De Fruyt, F., Van De Wiele, L., & Van Heeringen, C. (2000). Cloninger’s psychobiological model of temperament and character and the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(3), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00204-4
Ferraris, M. (2014). Manifesto of new realism (S. De Sanctis, Trans.). State University of New York Press.
Gergen, K. J. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. Springer.
Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27.
Michell, J. (1993). The origins of the representational theory of measurement: Helmholtz, Hölder, and Russell. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 24(2), 185–206.
Michell, J. (1994). Numbers as quantitative relations and the traditional theory of measurement. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45(2), 389–406.
Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355–385.
Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: Critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge University Press.
Michell, J. (2000). Normal science, pathological science and psychometrics. Theory and Psychology, 10(5), 639–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354300105004
Michell, J. (2003a). Epistemology of measurement: The relevance of its history for quantification in the social sciences. Social Science Information, 42, 515–534.
Michell, J. (2003b). The quantitative imperative: Positivism, Naïve Realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 13, 5–31.
Michell, J. (2005). The logic of measurement: A realist overview. Measurement, 38(4), 285–294.
Michell, J. (2008a). Conjoint measurement and the Rasch paradox: A response to Kyngdon. Theory and Psychology, 18(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307086926
Michell, J. (2008b). Is psychometrics pathological science? Measurement. Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 6(1–2), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366360802035489
Michell, J. (2009). The psychometricians’ fallacy: Too clever by half? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 41–55.
Michell, J. (2011a). Normal science, pathological science and psychometrics. In N. Mackay & A. Petocz (Hrsg.), Realism and psychology: Collected essays (S. 461–499). Brill.
Michell, J. (2011b). Qualitative research meets the ghost of Pythagoras. Theory and Psychology, 21(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310391351
Michell, J. (2012). “The constantly recurring argument”: Inferring quantity from order. Theory and Psychology, 22(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311434656
Michell, J. (2013). Constructs, inferences, and mental measurement. New Ideas in Psychology, 31(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.004
Puttonen, S., Ravaja, N., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2005). Cloninger’s temperament dimensions and affective responses to different challenges. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 46(2), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.023
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677
Xu, F., Spelke, E. S., & Goddard, S. (2005). Number sense in human infants. Developmental Science, 8(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00395.x
Zuckerman, M., & Cloninger, C. R. (1996). Relationships between Cloninger’s, Zuckerman’s, and Eysenck’s dimensions of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 283–285.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maree, D.J.F. (2022). Das realistische Bild der Wissenschaft. In: Realismus und die Wissenschaft der Psychologie. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16114-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16114-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16113-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16114-8
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)