Skip to main content

Introduction: Starting the Journey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engendering Migration Journey

Part of the book series: Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship ((MDC))

  • 107 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter starts by introducing the identity dilemma faced by many Thai migrant women in Hong Kong; it explains the background and the main purposes of the research, which focuses on the identity, ethnicity, and gender of Thai migrant women from an intersectional perspective. This chapter also situates the questions of this study: (1) How do Thai migrant women living in Hong Kong perceive their national and ethnic identity and their identity as a woman? (2) How do different generations of Thai migrant women identify themselves differently in the host community and navigate the ethnic boundaries in the host community? And (3) how does the socio-cultural context of Hong Kong shape Thai migrant women’s identity negotiation and affect their womanhood? In addition, this chapter also briefs about the research methods used in this study. Finally, the structure of the book is described at the end in a clear and concise manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alston, M., and Bowles, W. (1998). Research for Social Workers: An Introduction to Methods. Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergold, J., and Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13 (1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhugra, D., and Becker, M. A. (2005). Migration, Cultural Bereavement and Cultural Identity. World Psychiatry, 4(1), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilge, S. (2013). Intersectionality undone: Saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies1. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(2), 405–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. (1991). Social selves: Theories of the social formation of personality. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Census and Statistics Department. (2017). 2016 Population By-census Thematic Report: Ethnic Minorities. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department. Retrieved from http://www.census2016.gov.hk/pdf/EM.pdf.

  • Collins, P. H. (2019). Intersectionality as critical social theory. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conaghan, J. (2009). ‘Intersectionality and the Feminist Project of Law’, in Grabham, E., Cooper, D., Krishnadas, J. and Herman, D. (eds) Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location, pp. 21–48. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, S. C., and Buckle, J. L. (2009). The Space Between: On Being an Inside-Outside in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frable. D. E. S. (1997). Gender, Racial, Ethnic, Sexual, and Class Identities. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, K. M., Wong, Y. C., and Chan, C. L. W. (2003). Cultural Divergence in Cross-border Marriage in Hong Kong: A Call for Culturally Sensitive Approach in Social Work Practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work, 13(1), 42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, L. (2002). Context and Meaning in Social Identity Theory: A Response to Oakes. Political Psychology, 23(4), 825–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30 (3), 1771–1800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, A., and Pattynama, P. (2006). Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, K. (1997). Identity and difference. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbary Cheung .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheung, H. (2022). Introduction: Starting the Journey. In: Engendering Migration Journey. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15975-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15975-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15974-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15975-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics