Abstract
The chapter contributes to the ongoing debates around teacher empowerment, by discussing it as a structural-relational process, rather than an individual quality a teacher can acquire. It raises an issue of why pre-service teachers doing their degree would be motivated to act from the position of empowerment, when the main focus is academic achievement. The critical analysis in this chapter is based on a retrospective action research project that took place in an Australian University, with undergraduate pre-service teachers undertaking action research projects in their practicum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Bellous, J., & Pearson, E. (1995). Empowerment and teacher education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 14(3), 49–62.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.
Chaiklin, S. (2001). The category of “personality” in cultural-historical psychology. In S. Chaiklin (Ed.), The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 238–259). Aarhus Universoty Press.
Dodonov, B. (1985). O sisteme “lichnost” [About the system of personhood]. Voprosi Psiholohii, 5, 36–45.
Efron, S., & Ravid, R. (2013). Action research in education: A practical guide. Guilford Press.
Elliott, J. (2012). Are performance indicators educational quality indicators? In Reconstructing teacher education: teacher development (pp. 51–64). Routledge Library Editions: Education 221.
Emerick, S., Montgomery , D., Reeves, C., Church, K., & Hirsch, E. (2007). Teaching and learning conditions improve high school reform efforts. Center for Teaching Quality. Retrieved from https://dschool.stanford.edu/groups/k12/wiki/f329e/…/Team1%20hsconditions-1.pdf
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity theory-theoretical approach. Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity theoretical recosnceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5(4), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00021-6
Foot, K. (2002). Pursuing and evolving object: A case study on object formation and identification. Mind, Culture and Society, 9(2), 132–149.
Ho, S. M. (2017). An approach to motivation and empowerment: The application of positive psychology. In I. Amzat (Ed.), Teacher empowerment toward professional development and practices (pp. 167–182). Springer.
Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality (M. Hall, Trans.). Prentice-Hall.
Leontiev, A. A. (2006). ‘Units’ and Levels of Activity. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 44(3), 30–46.
Maslow, A. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.
Matusov, Lowery, P., Bergeron, V., Hayes, R., Letts, W., & McKinney, M. (1999). Schools for growth: Radical alternatives to current educational models. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 30(3), 384–385. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1999.30.3.384
Popova, A. (2009). Historical transformations of pedagogic practice: a socio-cultural and activity theory analysis of preparation for work in Russian schools. University of Bath. Retrieved from http://opus.bath.ac.uk/27868/1/Univ_Bth_PhD_2009_A_Popova.pdf
Popova, A. (2010). History in person and person in history: The case of preparation for work in Russian schools before and after1991. Action: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 3, 39–60.
Popova, A., & Daniels, H. (2004). Employing the concept of the object in the discussion of the links between school pedagogies and individual working lives in pre and post-Soviet Russia. Educational Review, 56(2), 193–205.
Shimwooshili Shaimemanya, C. (2017). Transforming education through teacher empowerment in Namibia: Possibilities and challenges. In I. Amzat (Ed.), Teacher empowerment toward professional develoment and practices (pp. 87–102). Springer.
Steyn, G. (2001). Staff empowerment: Creating an empowered work environment in schools. Acta Academica, 33, 146–167.
Ulvik, M., & Riese, H. (2016). Action research in pre-service teacher education—A never-ending story promoting professional development. Professional Development in Education, 42(3), 441–457.
Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. A sociogenetic approach to personality. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yonemura, M. (1986). Reflections on teacher empowerment and teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 473–481.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Popova, A. (2023). A Socio-Cultural and Activity Theory Analysis of Pre-service Teachers’ Empowerment to Conduct Action Research. In: Zajda, J., Hallam, P., Whitehouse, J. (eds) Globalisation, Values Education and Teaching Democracy . Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15896-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15896-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15895-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15896-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)