Abstract
The research productivity of a country is positively associated with the development of its scientific capacity, which, in turn, contributes to the nation’s economic growth. In this paper, we explore the research productivity of Kazakhstan in economics and business disciplines and reveal its specific characteristics. Our methodology followed two steps. First, applying scientometric (descriptive statistics and network analysis) methods, we analyzed 3225 articles from Kazakhstan and published in international journals during 1991–2020. We focus on three subject areas in Scopus: Business, management, and accounting; Decision sciences; and Economics, econometrics, and finance. Second, we conduct comprehensive interviews with four experts representing the science sector and government. The study found that research in economics and business disciplines was growing, emphasizing agriculture, agro-industrial complex, cluster development, entrepreneurship, innovative development, investments, and sustainable development areas. The interviews reveal the issues of doing research in higher education institutions (from the bottom-up) and improving the government’s science sector (from the top-down). Among others, these challenges are related to developing critical research areas, science funding, and their impact on economic growth. Our findings may serve as exemplary for other emerging economies that face similar challenges in developing their global research profile.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alshater, M., Hassan, M., Rashid, M., & Hasan, R. (2021). A bibliometric review of the Waqf literature. Eurasian Economic Review.
Amirbekova, D. (2016). The knowledge competence development and use of information technologies in small and medium-sized enterprises in Kazakhstan. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(20), 94475.
Ayala-Bastidas, G., Ceballos, H., & Cantu-Ortiz, F. (2021). A systematic review of recommendations of long-term strategies for researchers using data science techniques. Computers, 10(3), 35.
Brinkmann, S. (2014). Unstructured and semi-structured interviewing. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 277–299). Oxford University Press.
Calma, A., & Davies, M. (2016). Academy of Management Journal, 1958–2014: A citation analysis. Scientometrics, 108(2), 959–975.
Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (1st ed.). Sage.
Cooksey, R., & McDonald, G. (2011). Surviving and thriving in postgraduate research. Tilde University Press.
De Marco, A., Mangano, G., & Narbaev, T. (2017). The influence of risk on the equity share of build-operate-transfer projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(1), 45–58.
DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321.
Fauzi, M. A., Nya-Ling, C. T., Thursamy, R., & Ojo, A. O. (2019). Knowledge sharing: Role of academics towards research productivity in higher learning institutions. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 49(1), 136–159.
Gasparyan, A. Y., Yessirkepov, M., Duisenova, A., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2018). Researcher and author impact metrics: Variety, value, and context. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 33(18).
Jack, P., Lachman, J., & López, A. (2021). Scientific knowledge production and economic catching-up: An empirical analysis. Scientometrics, 126, 4565–4587.
Jameel, A. S., & Ahmad, A. R. (2020). Factors impacting research productivity of academic staff at the Iraqi higher education system. International Business Education Journal, 13(1), 108–126.
Lee, Y.-H. (2020). Determinants of research productivity in Korean universities: The role of research funding. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(5), 1462–1486.
Lehmann, E., Meoli, M., Paleari, S., & Stockinger, S. (2018). Approaching effects of the economic crisis on university efficiency: A comparative study of Germany and Italy. Eurasian Business Reivew, 8, 37–54.
Marozau, R., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2016). Impacts of universities in different stages of economic development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(1), 1–21.
Mobin, M., Mahi, M., Hassan, M., Habib, M., Akter, S., & Hassan, T. (2021). An analysis of COVID-19 and WHO global research roadmap: Knowledge mapping and future research agenda. Eurasian Economic Review, 1–22.
Moldabekova, A., Zhidebekkyzy, A., Baimukhanbetova, E., & Akhmetkaliyeva, S. (2020). Advanced technologies in improving the management of logistics services: Bibliometric network analysis. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(1), 211–223.
Muhamedyev, R., Aliguliyev, R., Shokishalov, Z., & Mustakayev, R. (2018). New bibliometric indicators for prospectivity estimation of research fields. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 65, 62–69.
Mukhtarova, K. S., Kozhakhmetova, A. K., Belgozhakyzy, M., Dosmbek, A., & Barzhaksyyeva, A. (2019). High-tech entrepreneurship in developing countries: Way to success. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 25(1).
Narbaev, T. (2015, November 5–6). Project management knowledge discovery in Kazakhstan: Co-word analysis of the field. In Proceedings of international conference on intellectual capital, knowledge management and organisational learning. IKI-SEA of Bangkok University.
Narbaev, T., De Marco, A., & Orazalin, N. (2020). A multi-disciplinary meta-review of the public-private partnerships research. Construction Management and Economics, 38(2), 109–125.
Narbaev, T., & Amirbekova, D. (2021). Research productivity in emerging economies: Empirical evidence from Kazakhstan. Publica, 9(4), 51.
Olczyk, M. (2016). A systematic retrieval of international competitiveness literature: A bibliometric study. Eurasian Economic Review, 6, 429–457.
Orazalin, N., Mahmood, M., & Narbaev, T. (2019). The impact of sustainability performance indicators on financial stability: Evidence from the Russian oil and gas industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(8), 8157–8168.
Pu, W., Xu, F., & Marques, R. (2021). A bibliometric and meta-analysis of studies on public-private partnership in China. Construction Management and Economics, 39(9), 773–789.
Rossetto, D. E., Bernardes, R. C., Borini, F. M., & Gattaz, C. C. (2018). Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: Review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1329–1363.
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation, 28(11), 758–775.
Shi, J., Duan, K., Wu, G., Zhang, R., & Feng, X. (2020). Comprehensive metrological and content analysis of the public-private partnership (PPPs) research field: A new bibliometric journey. Scientometrics, 124, 2145–2184.
Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Karamahmutoglu, M. (2022). Macroeconomic factors, R&D expenditure and research productivity in economics and finance. Managerial Finance, 48(5), 733–759.
Wang, L., Chen, X., Bao, A., Zhang, X., Wu, M., Hao, Y., & He, J. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of research on Central Asia during 1990–2014. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1223–1237.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, grant number AP08856031.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Amirbekova, D., Narbaev, T. (2022). Research Productivity in Economics and Business Disciplines in Emerging Economies: Insights from Kazakhstan. In: Bilgin, M.H., Danis, H., Demir, E. (eds) Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15531-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15531-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15530-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15531-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)