Abstract
Innovative technologies often face acceptance challenges. This is especially true when they constitute disruptive innovations. Disruptive innovations can forcefully alter the way things are done in the economy and society and have differential impacts for social groups. Legitimacy – the fit between an innovation, and society at large – is an important explanatory factor of the success of disruptive technologies. The micro-judgements of legitimacy that individuals make with regards to a technology, can help understand why some innovations succeed or fail. Likewise, users’ actions when using said innovations may indicate how acceptable the technology is to users. This paper analyses how users judge, and use, the NHS COVID-19 Test & Trace app. Preliminary findings suggest that individuals’ micro-legitimacy judgements are strongly related to the decision to use the app or not, and that users have adopted a number of workaround behaviours to resist or compensate for the app’s functionality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ferreira, C., Merendino, A., Meadows, M., Simkin, L.: Learning, leading, linking: managing digital disruption. Centre for Business in Society, Coventry University, Coventry (2022)
Christensen, C.M.: The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston (1997)
Millar, C., Lockett, M., Ladd, T.: Disruption: technology, innovation and society. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 129, 254–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.020
Kilkki, K., Mäntylä, M., Karhu, K., Hämmäinen, H., Ailisto, H.: A disruption framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 129, 275–284 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.034
Ferreira, C., Merendino, A., Meadows, M.: Disruption and legitimacy: big data in society. Inf. Syst. Front. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10155-3
Suchman, M.C.: Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 571 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Bunduchi, R., Candi, M.: Technology legitimation: a product‐level examination across the technology lifecycle. Br. J. Manag. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12562
Ferneley, E.H., Sobreperez, P.: Resist, comply or workaround? An examination of different facets of user engagement with information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 345–356 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000629
Tost, L.P.: An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36, 686–710 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.65554690
Bitektine, A., Haack, P.: The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. AMR 40, 49–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0318
Bitektine, A.: Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: the case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36, 151–179 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382
Deephouse, D.L., Bundy, J., Tost, L.P., Suchman, M.C.: Organizational legitimacy: six key questions. In: Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T., Meyer, R. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2017)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Xu, X.: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. JAIS 17, 328–376 (2016). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
Shachak, A., Kuziemsky, C., Petersen, C.: Beyond TAM and UTAUT: future directions for HIT implementation research. J. Biomed. Inform. 100, 103315 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103315
Kim, K.: Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective. MIS Q. 33, 567 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2307/20650309
Selander, L., Henfridsson, O.: Cynicism as user resistance in IT implementation: cynicism as user resistance in IT implementation. Inf. Syst. J. 22, 289–312 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00386.x
Laumer, S., Maier, C., Eckhardt, A., Weitzel, T.: User personality and resistance to mandatory information systems in organizations: a theoretical model and empirical test of dispositional resistance to change. J. Inf. Technol. 31, 67–82 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.17
Rivard, L.: Information technology implementers’ responses to user resistance: nature and effects. MIS Q. 36, 897 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2307/41703485
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ferreira, C., Meadows, M., Azer, E. (2022). Technology Legitimation and User Resistance: The NHS COVID-19 App. In: Papagiannidis, S., Alamanos, E., Gupta, S., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M., Pappas, I.O. (eds) The Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World. I3E 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13454. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15341-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15342-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
