Skip to main content

Robotic Standard Right Hemicolectomy with Intra-corporeal Anastomosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Abstract

In this chapter, we offer a step-by-step description of the standard technique for robot-assisted right hemicolectomy with intra-corporeal anastomosis, which is our preferred approach for patients with right colon cancer. The benefits of the technique include optimising the quality of the pathologic specimen and lymph node harvest, while minimizing the extent of colonic dissection, mobilisation, and mesenteric traction placed on the ileo-colic anastomosis compared to an extra-corporal anastomosis. This chapter is supplemented by a series of clinical images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leal Ghezzi T, Campos CO. 30 years of robotic surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2550–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu H, Xu M, Liu R, Jia B, Zhao Z. The art of robotic colonic resection: a review of progress in the past 5 years. Updates Surg. 2021;73(3):1037–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton AER, Chatfield MD, Johnson CS, Stevenson ARL. Totally robotic right hemicolectomy: a multicentre case-matched technical and peri-operative comparison of port placements and da Vinci models. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(3):479–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakata S, Grove PM, Stevenson AR. Effect of 3-dimensional vision on surgeons using the da vinci robot for laparoscopy: more than meets the eye. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(9):793–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vignali A, Elmore U, Lemma M, Guarnieri G, Radaelli G, Rosati R. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomoses following laparoscopic right colectomy in obese patients: a case-matched study. Dig Surg. 2018;35(3):236–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H. Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1031–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, et al. Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1512–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon F, O’Hara R, Ghuman N, Strachan J, Khanna A, Keeler BD. Major colorectal resection is feasible using a new robotic surgical platform: the first report of a case series. Tech Coloproctol. 2021;25(3):285–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spinelli A, David G, Gidaro S, et al. First experience in colorectal surgery with a new robotic platform with haptic feedback. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20(3):228–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rollins KE, Javanmard-Emamghissi H, Acheson AG, Lobo DN. The role of oral antibiotic preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019;270(1).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waters PS, Cheung FP, Peacock O, et al. Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer-a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22(5):488–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Larach JT, Flynn J, Kong J, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: evolution over a decade. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(11):2330–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schootman M, Hendren S, Ratnapradipa K, Stringer L, Davidson NO. Adoption of robotic technology for treating colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(11):1011–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, et al. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg. 2013;37(12):2782–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichiro Sakata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sakata, S., Moloney, J.M., Stevenson, A.R.L. (2022). Robotic Standard Right Hemicolectomy with Intra-corporeal Anastomosis. In: Coyne, P., Khan, J. (eds) Robotic Colorectal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15198-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15198-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15197-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15198-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics