Abstract
The teaching profession is dynamic and requires constant development. By introducing and prioratising an effective professional development system, school facilitates the introduction of innovations. The term “professional development” refers to an orderly, continuous, and intensive approach to improving teacher's work efficiency with the ultimate goal of further enhancing student achievement which involves three interrelated stages: study of specific needs, planning and implementation of relevant activities, evaluation of the obtained effect. The most popular activities are trainings with the core concept of digitalization, which involves developing teachers digital competence and skills using digital tools. During the pandemic, the practice of offering various types of online trainings for teacher professional development has gradually increased. Different digital educational platforms were introduced. Above mentioned online trainings/webinars were the best solution to maintain the continuity of teachers' professional development, however, this process posed a number of challenges to the pedagogical community. The purpose of the present work is, to identify the strengths and weaknesses of distance training, evaluate its results and define ways to increase efficiency. Research methods: surveys, interviews, focus groups. The research was conducted in 3 stages: an online survey of teachers, an interview with 14 school principals and a focus group with trainers/representatives of training organizations. Research outcomes: Though teacher development programs were problematic in terms of intensity, outdated topics, teachers lack of digital competence, poor internet connection, lack of implementation and evaluation of the training experience, the flexibility and availability of attendance, access to the materials enhanced teachers readiness and motivation. On the basis of the research and analysis that highlight the current situation recommendations are made which will add practical value to the study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Liu, A., Liu, N., Wang, A.: Why can’t rural schools retain young teachers? An analysis of the professional development of rural school teachers in China: taking teachers in rural western China. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open. 5, 100238 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSAHO.2021.100238
Nelimarkka, M., Leinonen, T., Durall, E., Dean, P.: Facebook is not a silver bullet for teachers’ professional development: anatomy of an eight-year-old social-media community. Comput. Educ. 173, 104269 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2021.104269
Simons, P., Ruijters, M.C.: The real professional is a learning professional. In: Billett, S., Harteis, C., Gruber, H. (eds.) International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education, pp. 955–985. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_35
Hennessy, S., et al.: Technology use for teacher professional development in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. Open. 3, 100080 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEO.2022.100080
Kim, D., Long, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhou, S., Alexander, J.: Teacher professional identity development through digital stories. Comput. Educ. 162, 104040 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2020.104040
Chaaban, Y., Arar, K., Sawalhi, R., Alhouti, I., Zohri, A.: Exploring teachers’ professional agency within shifting educational contexts: a comparative study of Lebanon, Qatar, Kuwait, and Morocco. Teach. Teach. Educ. 106, 103451 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2021.103451
Mendoza, N.B., Cheng, E.C.K., Yan, Z.: Assessing teachers’ collaborative lesson planning practices: Instrument development and validation using the SECI knowledge-creation model. Stud. Educ. Eval. 73, 101139 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2022.101139
El Shaban, A., Egbert, J.: Diffusing education technology: a model for language teacher professional development in CALL. System 78, 234–244 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2018.09.002
Çamlıbel-Acar, Z., Eveyik-Aydın, E.: Perspectives of EFL teacher trainers and pre-service teachers on continued mandatory distance education during the pandemic. Teach. Teach. Educ. 112, 103635 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2022.103635
Martin, A., Partika, A., Castle, S., Horm, D., Johnson, A.D.: Both sides of the screen: Predictors of parents’ and teachers’ depression and food insecurity during COVID-19-related distance learning. Early Child. Res. Q. 60, 237–249 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECRESQ.2022.02.001
Heikkilä, M., Iiskala, T., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M.: Voices of student teachers’ professional agency at the intersection of theory and practice. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 25, 100405 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LCSI.2020.100405
Tang, H.: Teaching teachers to use technology through massive open online course: perspectives of interaction equivalency. Comput. Educ. 174, 104307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2021.104307
Eshchar-Netz, L., Vedder-Weiss, D., Lefstein, A.: Status and inquiry in teacher communities. Teach. Teach. Educ. 109, 103524 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2021.103524
Segal, A.: Story exchange in teacher professional discourse. Teach. Teach. Educ. 86, 102913 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2019.102913
Prenger, R., Poortman, C.L., Handelzalts, A.: Factors influencing teachers’ professional development in networked professional learning communities. Teach. Teach. Educ. 68, 77–90 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2017.08.014
Shoiynbayeva, G.T., Shokanov, A.K., Sydykova, Z.K., Sugirbekova, A.K., Kurbanbekov, B.A.: Methodological foundations of teaching nanotechnology when training future physics teachers. Think. Ski. Creat. 42, 100970 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2021.100970
Gaudin, C., Chaliès, S.: Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: a literature review. Educ. Res. Rev. 16, 41–67 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2015.06.001
Hordvik, M., Fletcher, T., Haugen, A.L., Møller, L., Engebretsen, B.: Using collaborative self-study and rhizomatics to explore the ongoing nature of becoming teacher educators. Teach. Teach. Educ. 101, 103318 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2021.103318
Ching, C.C., Hursh, A.W.: Peer modeling and innovation adoption among teachers in online professional development. Comput. Educ. 73, 72–82 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2013.12.011
Distance Learning Management: A Practical Guide for School Administrators. The Georgian Association of School Administrators prepared the textbook. Editor-in-Chief: Gia Murghulia, Tbilisi (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gurgenidze, M., Makaradze, N., Nakashidze-Makharadze, T., Karmanova, A., Nikiforova, Z., Sheleiko, V.A. (2022). Enhancing Teachers’ Digital Competence for Professional Development in Distance Mode. In: Rodionov, D., Kudryavtseva, T., Skhvediani, A., Berawi, M.A. (eds) Innovations in Digital Economy. SPBPU IDE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1619. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14985-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14985-6_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14984-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14985-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)