Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of QFD to Prioritize Requirements Needed for Supplier Selection in an O&G Project

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IJCIEOM 2022)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 400))

Abstract

Due to the constant need to establish methods in the supplier selection process to avoid delays, reworks, cost increases and stakeholder discontent in projects in the Oil and Gas (O&G) sector, it is necessary to evaluate multi-criteria models and tools to prioritize both the industry regulations and strict technical specifications. This prioritization provides robustness in the construction of procurement contracts as well as effectiveness in the analysis of the technical proposal by engineering. The present study presents the use of the QFD (Quality Function Development) model in an O&G project in Bahia to build a validation system for high pressure fluid tests, simulating the pre-salt layer. The study aimed to prioritize the requirements to be met by suppliers of Service, Material, Equipment and Instruments from the design phase to the construction and delivery of the project. As a main result, the use of the model provided the integration between different disciplines in the group decision-making process, quantification of the team’s judgments in numbers, understanding of the main risks between project requirements and establishing a technical proposal validation plan considering the requirements resulting priorities, enabling greater assertiveness for acquisitions and technical validations throughout the project life cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, R.N.: Petroleum analytics learning machine' for optimizing the Internet of Things of today’s digital oil field-to-refinery petroleum system. In: Proceedings in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), p. 4542e4545 (2017, Dec)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li, F., et al.: Rational supplier selection based on two-phase deep analysis considering Fuzzy QFD and Game Theory. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2021, 1--12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9979017

  3. Karsak, E.E., Dursun, M.: Taxonomy and review of non-deterministic analytical methods for supplier selection. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 29(3), 263–286 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2014.1003410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bo, Y., Meifang, Y.: Construction of the knowledge service model of a port supply chain enterprise in a big data environment. Neural Comput. & Applic. 33(5), 1699–1710 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05044-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J, J.K: Mathematical modeling of Indian Petroleum Supply Chain. Int. Res. J. Modern. Eng. Technol. Sci. 07, 2582–5208 (2020) www.irjmets.com

    Google Scholar 

  6. Afroz, Z., Shafiullah, G.M., Urmee, T., Higgins, G.: Modeling techniques used in building HVAC control systems: a review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 83(February), 64–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amalnick, M.S., Habibifar, N., Hamid, M., Bastan, M.: An intelligent algorithm for final product demand forecasting in pharmaceutical units. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 11(2), 481–493 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00879-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yin, X.F., Khoo, L.P., Chong, Y.T.: A fuzzy c-means based hybrid evolutionary approach to the clustering of supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 66(4), 768–780 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.09.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Keskin, G.A.: Using integrated fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy C: means algorithm for supplier evaluation and selection. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(12), 3586–3602 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.980461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Z., Han, H., Cui, X., Fan, Y.: Novel application of multi-model ensemble learning for fault diagnosis in refrigeration systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 164(July 2019), 114516 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramakurthi, V.B., Manupati, V.K., Machado, J., Varela, L.: A hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithm-based semantic foundation for sustainable distributed manufacturing systems. Appl. Sci. (Switzerland). 11(14) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146314

  12. Serapião, A.B.S., Mendes, J.R.P.: Classification of petroleum well drilling operations with a hybrid particle swarm/ant colony algorithm. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5579 LNAI(January 2016), 301–310 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02568-6_31

  13. Kaviani, M.A., Karbassi Yazdi, A., Ocampo, L., Kusi-Sarpong, S.: An integrated grey-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for supplier evaluation and selection in the oil and gas industry. Kybernetes. 49(2), 406–441 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-05-2018-0265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kar, A.K.: A hybrid group decision support system for supplier selection using analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy set theory and neural network. J. Comput. Sci. 6, 23–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2014.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, C., Lin, Y., Barnes, D.: An integrated decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection in the chemical industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 184(May), 115553 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wood, D.A.: Supplier selection for development of petroleum industry facilities, applying multi-criteria decision making techniques including fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS with flexible entropy weighting. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 28, 594–612 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.12.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fagundes, M.V.C., Hellingrath, B., Freires, F.G.M.: Supplier selection risk: a new computer-based decision-making system with Fuzzy extended AHP. Logistics. 5(1), 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5010013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ristono, A.P., Santoso, P.B., Tama, I.P.: A literature review of criteria selection in supplier. J. Indus. Eng. Manag. 11(4), 680 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, C.N., Tsai, H.T., Ho, T.P., Nguyen, V.T., Huang, Y.F.: Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model for supplier evaluation and selection for oil production projects in Vietnam. PRO. 8(2) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8020134

  20. Akhtar, M., Ahmad, M.T.: A stochastic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making for sustainable vendor selection in Indian petroleum refining sector. Benchmarking. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2020-0500

  21. Dweiri, F., Kumar, S., Khan, S.A., Jain, V.: Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 62, 273–283 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dursun, M., Karsak, E.E.: A QFD-based fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier selection. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 5864–5875 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, C., Barnes, D.: A literature review of decision-making models and approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 17(4), 256–274 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2011.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E., Giacchetta, G.: A Fuzzy-QFD approach to supplier selection. J. Purchas. Supply Manag. 12, 14–27 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2006.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Çelikbilek, Y.: A grey analytic hierarchy process approach to project manager selection. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 31(3), 749–765 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, H., Duanmu, L., Lahdelma, R., Li, X.: A fuzzy-grey multicriteria decision making model for district heating system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 128, 1051–1106 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liou, J.J.H., Chang, M.H., Lo, H.W., Hsu, M.H.: Application of an MCDM model with data mining techniques for green supplier evaluation and selection. Appl. Soft Comput. 109, 107534 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chai, J., Liu, J.N.K., Ngai, E.W.T.: Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(10), 3872–3885 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aouadni, S., Aouadni, I., Rebaï, A.: A systematic review on supplier selection and order allocation problems. J. Indus. Eng. Int. 15(s1), 267–289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-019-00334-y

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Barata, J.F.F., Quelhas, O.L.G., Costa, H.G., Gutierrez, R.H., de Lameira, V.J., Meiriño, M.J.: Multi-criteria indicator for sustainability rating in suppliers of the oil and gas industries in Brazil. Sustainability (Switzerland). 6(3), 1107–1128 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tarei, P.K., Thakkar, J.J., Nag, B.: A hybrid approach for quantifying supply chain risk and prioritizing the risk drivers: a case of Indian petroleum supply chain. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 29(3), 533–569 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2017-0218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ho, W., Dey, P.K., Lockström, M.: Strategic sourcing: a combined QFD and AHP approach in manufacturing. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 16(6), 446–461 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alinezad, A., Seif, A., Esfandiari, N.: Supplier evaluation and selection with QFD and FAHP in a pharmaceutical company. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 68, 355–364 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4733-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zairi, M., Ginn, D.: East meets West: a critical analysis on the evolution, growth and transfer of QFD from Japan to the West. Asian J. Quality. 4(1), 1–19 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kapur, A., Potters, L., Mallalieu, L.B.: WE-C-214-02: six sigma tools for a “No-Fly” patient safety oriented, quality checklist driven, paperless multi-center radiation medicine department. Med. Phys. 38(6), 3807 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Polytechnic School, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil

    Sara Marques Oliveira de Araújo Souza, Cristiano Hora de Oliveira Fontes & Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires

Authors
  1. Sara Marques Oliveira de Araújo Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristiano Hora de Oliveira Fontes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering, Universidad Anáhuac, Anáhuac Huixquilucan, Mexico

    Victor Manuel López Sánchez

  2. Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

    Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires

  3. Industrial Engineering and Management, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal

    João Carlos Gonçalves dos Reis

  4. DEGEIT, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Joana Maria Costa Martins das Dores

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Araújo Souza, S.M.O., de Oliveira Fontes, C.H., Freires, F.G.M. (2022). Use of QFD to Prioritize Requirements Needed for Supplier Selection in an O&G Project. In: López Sánchez, V.M., Mendonça Freires, F.G., Gonçalves dos Reis, J.C., Costa Martins das Dores, J.M. (eds) Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. IJCIEOM 2022. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 400. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14763-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation