Skip to main content

Legislative Control and Native Metaphors in Social Media Interactions in Africa: Making Liberal Press Theories Functional in the Continent

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media and Communication Theory in Africa

Abstract

Executive and the legislators find a way of making laws and pronouncements that implicate citizens and impinge on their right to freedom of expression. This exploratory position paper notes that the struggle of citizen to stay afloat because of government controls and regulatory attempts ought to have gained added advantage because of technology. The study observes that Netizens are yet to discover the sanctuary in metaphorical cues embedded in many native metaphors of Nigerian and other African heritage. It recommends message sender’s encryptions using native metaphors, as they are essential bulwark against legislative fiats and sundry control ticks that could inhibit freedom of expression on social media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulrauf, A. A. (2019, November 26). Nigeria Bill Aims at Punishing Hate Speech with Death. DW. Retrieved August 20, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinkuotu, E. (2020, July 25). Student Arrested for Opening Jonathan Parody Account Denied Access to Lawyers. Punch Newspaper. Retrieved August 20, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atton, C. (2002). Alternative Media. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. (2010). Mass Communication Theory Foundations, Ferment, and Future (6th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbara, H. (1978). Freedom of the Press in Nigeria: The Debate. Africa /32. http://www.icwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/BHB-4.pdf

  • Bașaran, F., & Geray, H. (2005). İletișim ağlarının ekonomisi. Telekomünikasyon, kitle iletișimi, yazılım ve internet. Siyasal Kitabevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bufacchi, V. (2021). Truth, Lies and Tweets: A Consensus Theory of Post-Truth. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 47(3), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians, C. G., Glasser, T., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A (eds). (2009). Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cibaroglu, M. O. (2019). Post-Truth in Social Media. The Archival World, 6(2), 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S., & Ross, K. (2010). The Media and the Public “Them” and “Us” in Media Discourse. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., & Park, M. (2000). De-westernizing Media Studies. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (2007). The Meaning of Life: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ette, M. (2021). Journalism and Politics in Nigeria: Embers of Empire. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/resources/pdfs/978-1-5275-6710-8-sample.pdf

  • Eziefeka, C. R. (2013). Strategic Use of Metaphor in Nigerian Newspaper Reports: A Critical Perspective. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 6(2), 174–192. http://cadaad.net/journal

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, N. (2014). Defending Whose Democracy? Media Freedom and Media POWER. In H. Herald & S. O. Kristin (Eds.), Defending Democracy: Nordic and Global Diversities in Media Journalism. University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • GISWatch. (2014). Communications Surveillance in the Digital Age. Association for Progressive Communications and Hivos. Retrieved January 26, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • GISWatch. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: Human Rights, Social Justice and Development. Association for Progressive Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, T. L., & Gleason, T. W. (2013, April 12). Freedom of the Press in the Twenty-First Century: An Agenda for Thought and Action. A report from a summit on freedom of the press in the twenty-first century, University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godler, Y. (2020). Post-Post-Truth: An Adaptationist Theory of Journalistic Verism. Communication Theory, 30, 19–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions Within Communication Networks. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jeangène Vilmer, J. B., Escorcia, A., Guillaume, M., & Herrera, J. (2018, August). Information Manipulation: A Challenge for Our Democracies. Report by the Policy Planning Staff (CAPS) of the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs and the Institute for Strategic Research (IRSEM) of the Ministry for the Armed Forces, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, R. (2006). Human Rights in the Global Information Society. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiss, D., & Brennen, J. S. (2015). Normative Theories of Digital Journalism. In C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo, A. Hermida, & T. Witschge (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Digital Journalism Studies. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort, C. (1986). The Political Forms of Modern Society (p. 279). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (2005). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (2010). Media Regulations. https://www2.le.ac.uk/projects/oer/oers/media-and-communication/oerrs/ms7501/mod2unit11mod2unit11cg.pdf

  • Monod, J.-C. (2017, October). Verite de fait et opinion politique. Esprit, (10), 143–153. Translated from the French by Saul Lipetz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, G. P. K., & Tetsiguia, J. R. M. (2020). Discussing the “First Cry” as an Initial Assessment for Neonates. American Journal of Pediatrics, 6(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20200602.22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerone, J. (Ed.). (1995). Last Rights: Revisiting the Four Theories of the Press. University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenstreng, K. (1997). Beyond the Four Theories of the Press. In J. Servaes & R. Lie (Eds.), Media and Politics in Transition: Cultural Identity in the Age of Globalization. Uitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyamnjoh, F. (2005). Africa’s Media: Democracy, and the Politics of Belonging. UNISA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onagoruwa, O. (1977, December 11). On Nigeria Constitutional Review. Nigerian Sunday Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostini, J., & Ostini, A. Y. H. (2002). Beyond the Four Theories of the Press; a New Model of National Media Systems. Mass Communication and Society, 5(1), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reporters without Borders [Sınır Tanımayan Gazeteciler Örgütü]. (2019). World Press Freedom Index. https://rsf.org/en/ranking/

  • Roberts, T., & Ali, M. (2021). Opening and Closing Online Civic Space in Africa: An Introduction to the Ten Digital Rights Landscape Reports. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Digital Rights in Cloosing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries. https://doi.org/10.19088/IDS.2021.005

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Senghore, A. A. (2012). Press Freedom and Democratic Governance in The Gambia: A Rights-Based Approach. African Human Rights Law Journal, 12, 508–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, J. (2016). Reappraising Journalism’s Normative Foundations. In C. Peters & M. Broersma (Eds.), Rethinking Journalism Revisited. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltmer, K. (2013). The Media in Transitional Democracies. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, B. (2013). On the Shelf Life of Democracy in Journalism Scholarship. Journalism, 14(4), 459–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zselyke. (2019). A New Toolbox for Co-opting the Media (pp. 16–22). Freedom and the Media Freedom House. Retrieved October 26, 2021, from www.Freedomhouse.Org

  • Ztunç, M., & PİErre, M. (2021). Analysis of the Obstacles to the Freedom and Independence of the Media in the World and Turkey. TOJET, 20(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melchizedec J. Onobe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Onobe, M.J., Okocha, D.O., Nsereka, B.G. (2023). Legislative Control and Native Metaphors in Social Media Interactions in Africa: Making Liberal Press Theories Functional in the Continent. In: Okorie, N., Ojebuyi, B.R., Okpara, N. (eds) Media and Communication Theory in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14717-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics