Skip to main content

Transpiration Prediction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bringing Skepticism to Crop Science

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Agriculture ((BRIEFSAGRO))

  • 115 Accesses

Abstract

Management of water resources, especially under arid conditions predicted to result from climate change, will be become more critical in the future. Currently water loss from crop canopies is often estimated using an energy balance approach, e.g., the Penman-Monteith equation. However, there are several difficulties in this approach including accurately accounting for temporal variability in the inputs and the use of crude approximations to quantify some of the variables. Ultimately, the calculation is an empirical exercise as ‘guesstimates’ are required for an undefined crop coefficient with which to make adjustments in the energy balance output. An alternative to the energy balance approach, is the use of a mechanistic derivation that explicitly defines crop yield as a function of transpiration based on up-scaled leaf gas exchange equations. An input in estimating transpiration rate is crop radiation use efficiency, which is generally well documented for individual crop species. Tracking of plant stresses can allow adjustments of radiation use efficiency when stresses causing decreases in radiation use efficiency develop. Hence, crop transpiration can be calculated from well-defined, basic variables accounting for key processes determining plant transpiration rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbate PE, Dardanelli JL, Cantarero MG, Maturano M, Melchiori RJM, Suero EE (2004) Climate and water availability effects on water-use efficiency in wheat. Crop Sci 44:474–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO—United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Walter IA Elliott A, Howell T, Itenfisu D, Jensen M (2005) The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation. American Society of Civil Engineering—Environmental and Water Resources Institute of Task Committee Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade FH, Uhart SA, Cirilo A (1993) Temperature affects radiation use efficiency in maize. Field Crops Res 32:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera-Bosquet L, Fournier NB, Welchker C, Suard B, Tardieu F (2016) High-throughput estimation of incident light, light intercept and radiation use efficiency of thousands of plants in a phenotype platform. New Phytol 272:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristiano PM, Posse G, DiBella CM, Boca T (2012) Influence of contrasting availabilities of water and nutrients on the radiation use efficiencies of C3 and C4 grasses. App Eco 37:323–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficklin DL, Novick KA (2017) Historic and projected changes in vapor pressure deficit suggest a continental-scale drying of the United States atmosphere. J Geophy Res: Atmos 122:2061–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiniry JR, Burson BL, Evers GW, Williams JR, Sanchez H, Wade C, Featherston JW, Greenwade J (2007) Coastal bermudagrass, bahiagrass, and native range simulations in diverse sites in Texas. Agron J 99:450–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1964) Evaporation and environment. In: The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms, 19th Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 205–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A Math Phys Sci, vol 193, pp 120–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR (2006) A reminder of the limitations in using Beer’s Law to estimate daily radiation interception for vegetation. Crop Sci 46:2342–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR (ed) (2017) Water conservation traits to increase crop yields in water-deficit environments. Springer Books in Environmental Sciences, Springer, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Wherley BG, Dukes MD, Cathey SE (2014) Penman’s sink strength model as an improved approach to estimating plant canopy transpiration. Agric Met 197:136–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CB, Sinclair TR (1983) Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search? In: Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (eds) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wherley B, Dukes MD, Cathey S, Miller G, Sinclair T (2015) Consumptive water use and crop coefficients for warm-season turfgrass species in the Southeastern United States. Agric Water Manag 156:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Sinclair .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sinclair, T., Rufty, T.W. (2022). Transpiration Prediction. In: Bringing Skepticism to Crop Science. SpringerBriefs in Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14414-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics