Skip to main content

Erotic Outlaws: Tactile Looks, Women Desiring Women and Transgender Bodies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sex Clubs

Abstract

This chapter explores how transgressions take place within the sex club. First, using a group sex encounter, it highlights the ways in which different forms of heteroeroticism can be understood as contesting the everyday routines of the club and broader notions of heteronormativity. Embedded within this section of the chapter is the notion of gaze and how this is a reversible process of looking and being looked at. The second part of this chapter focuses on sex between women. Whilst initially framing this as taking place within a heteropatriarchal gaze driven by forms of neo-liberal sexual entrepreneurialism, the chapter reflects on this approach by suggesting that it is within the limits of neo-liberalism where transgressive sexual practices might emerge. Finally, the chapter tentatively explores transgender experiences. In particular, it argues that transgression is not always a positive experience but can also result in sexual violence. The chapter concludes by arguing that where sexual practice exceeds economies of desire, it can be the source of intense sexual pleasure. At the same time, such transgressions can be physically and emotionally dangerous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Angelides, S. (2019) The Fear of Child Sexuality: Young People, Sex, and Agency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwood, F. (2006). Sexed up: Theorizing the sexualization of culture. Sexualities, 9(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J. M. (2009). The tactile eye: Touch and the cinematic experience. Univ of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. 2010. Rethinking Governmentality: Towards Genealogies of Governance. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(4), 423–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bille, M. (2015) ‘Lighting up Cosy Atmospheres in Denmark’. Emotion, Space and Society, 15, 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, G. (2003). Pleats of matter, folds of the soul. Log, (1), 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, W. (1997). Bisexual characters in film: From Anais to Zee. Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. (2018). Cybercocks and Holodicks: Renegotiating the boundaries of material embodiment in Les-bi-trans-queer BDSM practices. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 14(2), 58–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, D. (2014) “This Thing of Ours”: Heterosexuality, Recreational Sex, and the Survival of Adult Movie Theaters. Media Fields. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, B. (1996) Horror and the Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection. In B. K. Grant (Ed.), The Dread of Difference: Gender and the Horror Film (pp. 44–45). University of Texas Press, 1996), 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. D., & Piemonte, J. L. (2021). Are there “better” and “worse” ways to be consensually non-monogamous (CNM)?: CNM types and CNM-specific predictors of dyadic adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(4), 1273–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy, Z., Steinbock, E. (2012). ‘Sexing Up’ Bodily Aesthetics: Notes towards Theorizing Trans Sexuality. In S. Hines, & Y. Taylor (Eds.) Sexualities: Past Reflections, Future Directions. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. (pp. 266–285) Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2005). ‘I’m straight, but I kissed a girl’: The trouble with American media representations of female-female sexuality. Feminism & Psychology, 15(1), 104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Edensor, (2017) From Light to Dark: Daylight, Illumination and Gloom. University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. & Riley, S. (2015). Technologies of Sexiness: Sex, Identity and Consumer Culture. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). A preface to transgression. Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M., (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16(1), 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1962). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, trans. James Strachey. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2003), From sexual objectification to sexual subjectification: The resexualisation of women’s bodies in the media, Feminist Media Studies, 3(1), 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European journal of cultural studies, 10(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. I. (2008). The social organization of desire: The sexual fields approach. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gressgård, R. (2010). When trans translates into tolerance-or was it monstrous? Transsexual and transgender identity in liberal humanist discourse. Sexualities, 13(5), 539–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Gill, R. (2011). Spicing it up: Sexual entrepreneurs and the sex inspectors. In R. Gill & C. Scharf (Eds.) New femininities, Postfeminism,Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. (pp. 52–67). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Halliwell, E. (2014). Bisexual women’s understandings of social marginalisation:‘The heterosexuals don’t understand us but nor do the lesbians’. Feminism & Psychology, 24(3), 352–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekman, S. (1991). Reconstituting the subject: feminism, modernism, and postmodernism. Hypatia 6(2): 44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, C. (2003). Transgression. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. (2002). Borderline bodies. In L. Bondi, H. Avis, & R. Bankey (2002). Subjectivities, knowledges, and feminist geographies: The subjects and ethics of social research. (pp. 75–89).Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalms, N. (2017). Hypersexual city: The provocation of soft-core urbanism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C., & Wilkinson, S. (1994). Virgins and queers: Rehabilitating heterosexuality?. Gender & Society, 8(3), 444–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1982) Power of Horror: An Essay on abjection. Translated by Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, J. R. (2016). Trans men’s sexual narrative-practices: Introducing STS to trans and sexuality studies. Sexualities, 19(3), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liepe-Levinson, K. 2002. Strip Show. Performances of Gender and Desire. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., & Ramsey, L. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 37(1), 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst, R. (2005). Spaces of sexual difference, fluidity and abjection. In K. Hörschelmann & B. van Hoven, Spaces of masculinities. (pp. 152–166). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskovsky, J. (2012). Beyond neoliberalism: Academia and activism in a nonhegemonic moment. American Quarterly, 64(4), 819–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, V., & Lewis, C. (2022). Micro-atmospheres of place: light and dark on a modernist housing scheme. Cultural Geographies, 29(1), 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, H. (2017). Queering femininity: Sexuality, feminism, and the politics of presentation. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J., & Clarke, J. (2018). The instabilities of expertise: remaking knowledge, power and politics in unsettled times. Innovation: The European journal of social science research, 31(1), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noack-Lundberg, K., Liamputtong, P., Marjadi, B., Ussher, J., Perz, J., Schmied, V., … & Brook, E. (2020). Sexual violence and safety: The narratives of transwomen in online forums. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 22(6), 646–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowatzki, J., & Morry, M. M. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(1), 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrella, S. (2019) Erotic Subjects and Outlaws: Sketching the Borders of Sexual Citizenship. Brill

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. Taylor & Frances/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. S. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). Boston: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumens, N., De Souza, E. M., & Brewis, J. (2019). Queering queer theory in management and organization studies: Notes toward queering heterosexuality. Organization Studies, 40(4), 593–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilt, K., & Westbrook, L. (2009). Doing Gender, Doing Heteronormativity: “Gender Normals,” Transgender People, and the Social Maintenance of Heterosexuality. Gender & society, 23(4), 440–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedinger, T. (1997). “ If sight and shape be true”: The Epistemology of Crossdressing on the London Stage. Shakespeare Quarterly, 48(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprengel, D. (2020). Reframing the ‘Arab Winter’: the importance of sleep and a quiet atmosphere after ‘defeated’revolutions. Culture, Theory and Critique, 61(2–3), 246–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, C. R., & Brouwer, D. C. (2002). In/discernible bodies: The politics of passing in dominant and marginal media. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(3), 283–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallybrass, P. & White, A. (1986) The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldby, C. (1995). Boundary erotics and refigurations of the heterosexual male body. Sexy bodies: The strange carnalities of feminism, 266–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waling, A. (2022). ‘Pay close attention to what my eyes are saying without having to spell it out’: Heterosexual relations and discourses of sexual communication in# MeToo commentaries. Sexualities, 13634607211060834.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. D. (2001). Bisexuals Who Kill: Hollywood’s Bisexual Crimewave, 1985–1998. Journal of Bisexuality, 2(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1989). Looking awry. October, 50, 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haywood, C. (2022). Erotic Outlaws: Tactile Looks, Women Desiring Women and Transgender Bodies. In: Sex Clubs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14050-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14050-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14049-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14050-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics