Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Online Surveys Creatively in Counselling and Psychotherapy Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supporting Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy

  • 2113 Accesses

Abstract

The use of online surveys is a rapidly expanding research tool within the counselling and psychotherapy professions and one that has considerable power and sophistication in harvesting both quantitative and qualitative data. Online surveys have the potential to reach groups of participants who might not engage in less anonymous research methods and consequently can be focused on very personal and sensitive issues. There have been significant advances in using online surveys and it’s clear that they can be a very effective qualitative research method. Using effective online surveys in research can be exciting and offer the researcher a variety of options to present the impact and meaning of their findings. There are also a range of intuitive analysis tools to explore and drill down into online survey data. There’s probably never been a better time to start exploring the versatility and participant inclusion offered by online surveys. The supporting technology is readily available and easy to use. If used wisely and focused on viable research topics, with due diligence to engaging with research participants, online surveys can deliver a wealth and richness of meaning that can provide new and relevant research to the counselling and psychotherapy professions. There is also an introduction to survey logic which is the basis of so-called intelligent surveys. For those unfamiliar with online surveys, how to construct a survey and what types of questions can be used a succinct account can be found by McBeath (Doing qualitative research with a survey. In S. Bager-Charleson & A.G. McBeath (Eds.), Enjoying research in counselling and psychotherapy (pp. 175–194). Palgrave Macmillan, 2020b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bager-Charleson, S. & McBeath, A.G. (2021b). Containment, compassion and clarity. Mixed methods research into supervision during doctoral research for psychotherapists and counselling psychologist. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12498.

  • Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., Braun, V., Frith, H., & Moller, N. (2019). Editorial introduction to the special issue: Using story completion methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1536378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Moller, N., & Tischner, I. (2017). Once upon a time … : Story completion methods. In V. Braun, V. Clarke, & D. Gray (Eds.), Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques (pp. 45–70). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, L., Clarke, V., & Jenkinson, E. (2019). Living with alopecia areata: An online qualitative survey study. British Journal of Dermatology, 180(6), 1377–1389. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gravett, K. (2019). Story completion: Storying as a method of meaning making and discursive discovery. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humer, E., Stippl, P., Pieh, C., Pryss, R., & Probst, T. (2020). Experiences of psychotherapists with remote psychotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(11), e20246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, B., & Garza, G. (2015). Mending fences: Defining the domains and approaches of quantitative and qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 2(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, A. G. (2019). The motivations of psychotherapists: An in-depth survey. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 19(4), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12225

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, A. G. (2020a). Doing quantitative research with statistics. In S. Bager-Charleson & A. G. McBeath (Eds.), Enjoying research in counselling and psychotherapy (pp. 161–173). Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, A. G. (2020b). Doing qualitative research with a survey. In S. Bager-Charleson & A. G. McBeath (Eds.), Enjoying research in counselling and psychotherapy (pp. 175–194). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, A. G., & Bager-Charleson, S. (2022). Views on mixed methods research within counselling and psychotherapy: An online survey (manuscript submitted for publication). Metanoia Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, A. G., du Plock, S., & Bager-Charleson, S. (2020). The challenges and experiences of psychotherapists working remotely during the coronavirus pandemic. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 20(3), 394–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, A. G., Bager-Charleson, S., & Abarbanel, A. (2019). Therapists and academic writing: “Once upon a time psychotherapy practitioners and researchers were the same people”. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 19, 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, C. (2019). ‘Rarely discussed but always present’: Exploring therapists’ accounts of social class in therapy. D Couns Psych. University of the West of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. (2015). Doing research in counselling and psychotherapy. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, A.S. (2022). “Are you analysing me?” A story completion exploration of having a friend who is becoming a psychotherapist. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, Vol 12, 64-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, N. P., Clarke, V., Braun, V., Tischner, I., & Vossler, A. (2021). Qualitative story completion for counseling psychology research: A creative method to interrogate dominant discourses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opperman, E., Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rogers, C. (2014). “It feels so good it almost hurts”: Young adults’ experiences of orgasm and sexual pleasure. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.753982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal, 311, 42–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pybis, J., Saxon, D., & Hill., & Barkham, M. (2017). The comparative effectiveness and efficiency of cognitive behaviour therapy and generic counselling in the treatment of depression: Evidence from the 2nd UK National Audit of psychological therapies. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 215. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1370-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah-Beckley, I., Clarke, V., & Thomas, Z. (2018). Therapists’ and non-therapists’ constructions of heterosex: A qualitative story completion study. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12203

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. W., & Ussher, J. M. (2001). Making sense of S & M: A discourse analytic account. Sexualities, 4(3), 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Metanoia Institute, London, UK

    Alistair McBeath

Authors
  1. Alistair McBeath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alistair McBeath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Metanoia Institute, London, UK

    Sofie Bager-Charleson

  2. Metanoia Institute, London, UK

    Alistair McBeath

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McBeath, A. (2022). Using Online Surveys Creatively in Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. In: Bager-Charleson, S., McBeath, A. (eds) Supporting Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13942-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation