Skip to main content

Quantitative Practice-Based Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supporting Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy

Abstract

Hanley et al. offer an overview of core principles of quantitative research and how these might be used to answer descriptive, comparative or relationship-based research questions. Following on from this, the authors discuss adventurous projects attempting to articulate a theory of change for online therapeutic services. An overarching mixed methods design is described before going on to discuss the way that quantitative methods have been used to complement earlier qualitative research. The authors share two examples of projects where the research team have attempted to keep the individuals seeking support at the fore of what is being measured, one reporting the use of an idiographic measure (the GBO) and one a hybrid nomothetic/idiographic measure (the SWAN-OM) in real-world therapeutic work. Both these studies highlight the utility of using these measures in web-based therapeutic work. The authors reflect upon the strengths and limitations of this work, concluding that while quantitative research is always reductive, there are ways of collecting numerical information that can place the individuals seeking support in the driving seat of what is being assessed. Whilst this adds an element of complexity to the understanding gained from such measures, it can help to humanise the numbers being collected and has the potential to enhance the therapeutic work engaged in.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bugental, J. F. T. (1964). The third force in psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 4(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216786400400102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M., & McLeod, J. (2011). Pluralistic counselling and psychotherapy. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. (2012). Criteria for assessing the evaluability of a theory of change (pp. 1–6). file:///Users/mewxsth3/Downloads/Davies_Evaluability20of20ToCs.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • de Ossorno Garcia, S., Salhi, L., Sefi, A., & Hanley, T. (2021). The session wants and need outcome measure: The development of a brief outcome measure for single-sessions of web-based support. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 4900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurtzen, N., Keijsers, G. P. J., Karremans, J. C., Tiemens, B. G., & Hutschemaekers, G. J. M. (2020). Patients’ perceived lack of goal clarity in psychological treatments: Scale development and negative correlates. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 27(6), 915–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, T., Sefi, A., Grauberg, J., & Prescott, J. (2019). A positive virtual Ecosystem: The theory of change for Kooth. Xenzone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymmen, P., Stalker, C. A., & Cait, C.-A. (2013). The case for single-session therapy: Does the empirical evidence support the increased prevalence of this service delivery model? Journal of Mental Health, 22(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2012.670880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, J., Costa da Silva, L., Sefi, A., & Edbrooke-Childs, J. (2020). Online counselling and goal achievement: Exploring meaningful change and the types of goals progressed by young people. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 502–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, J., De Francesco, D., Deighton, J., Law, D., Wolpert, M., & Edbrooke-Childs, J. (2017). Goal formulation and tracking in child mental health settings: When is it more likely and is it associated with satisfaction with care? European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 26(7), 759–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, A., & Lumley, T. (2012). Theory of change: The beginning of making a difference. New Philanthropy Capital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, D., & Jacob, J. (2015). Goals and goals based outcomes (GBOs): Some useful. information Third Edition CAMHS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, A. G. (2020). Doing quantitative research with a survey. In S. Bager-Charleson & A. G. McBeath (Eds.), Enjoying research in counselling and psychotherapy. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS Digital. (2021). Mental health of children and young people in England 2021—Wave 2 follow up to the 2017 survey. NHS Digital. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/mental-health-of-children-and-young-people-in-england/2021-follow-up-to-the-2017-survey

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, J., de Ossorno Garcia, S., Gadd, L., & Gillman, A. (2021). Theory of change Kooth for adults. NPC. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23036.05764

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. C., & Wampold, B. E. (2018). A new therapy for each patient: Evidence-based relationships and responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(11), 1889–1906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, J. L., Chojenta, C., & Loxton, D. (2013). Quality, rigour and usefulness of free-text comments collected by a large population based longitudinal study—ALSWH. PLoS One, 8(7), e68832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sefi, A., & Hanley, T. (2012). Examining the complexities of measuring effectiveness of online counselling for young people using routine evaluation data. Pastoral Care in Education, 30(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talmon, M. (1990). Single-session therapy: Maximizing the effect of the first (and often only) therapeutic encounter (p. xxi, 146). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, G. S., et al. (2018). Meta-analyses of the relation of goal consensus and collaboration to psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 372–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, M., Ford, T., Trustam, E., Law, D., Deighton, J., Flannery, H., & Fugard, R. J. B. (2012). Patient-reported outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS): Use of idiographic and standardized measures. Journal of Mental Health, 21(2), 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry Hanley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Banwell, E., Hanley, T., Sefi, A. (2022). Quantitative Practice-Based Research. In: Bager-Charleson, S., McBeath, A. (eds) Supporting Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13942-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics